United States: Recovery For Negligent Infliction Of Emotional Distress Under California Law Gains A Greater Clarity

The recent decision in Wilson v. Southern California Edison Co., __Cal. App. 4th__, 2015 WL 522578, provides increased clarity into the California rule permitting claims for negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED) by direct victims who do not suffer a physical injury. Direct victim cases are those in which the plaintiff's claim of emotional distress is not based upon witnessing an injury to someone else, but rather upon the violation of a duty owed directly to the plaintiff.1 will not survive unless the alleged breach of duty threatens an actual physical injury. Wilson holds that an NIED claim

NIED claims in California have bewildered both the plaintiff and defense bars for decades. Determining the set of circumstances sufficient to permit recovery for serious emotional distress caused by the negligence of another when there is no physical injury has proved to be a difficult task.2 While some states draw a bright-line rule requiring a physical injury as a predicate for an NIED claim, a rule intended to reduce the danger of false claims for pure emotional distress, this is not the rule in California.3

California has long permitted recovery for serious emotional distress without physical injury.4 The courts, however, recognize that a person's psychological reaction to an event may not be foreseeable and that pure psychological injuries are much more susceptible to being faked than physical injury.5 While California permits claims only in specialized circumstances, the case law does not provide a general rule for recovery. One California court described the uncertainty of injury and the danger of malingering in a pure emotional distress claim as follows:

One can always worry oneself sick, almost as a matter of will. The reality of psychological injury remains [] a subject of intense philosophical debate. There is always the suspicion that extending the tort duty gives plaintiffs an incentive to malinger or worry themselves into a state of depression. Suffice [it] to say for purposes of this case that certainty of injury is something that we do not have. Yes, the question of the reality of injury can go to a jury, but that is not the point. Psychological symptoms are much more susceptible to being faked than more palpable effects.6

The Lawson court quoted above recognized the lack of a general theory of recovery by stating, "[w]e will not attempt, in this opinion, to articulate any great general rules for emotional distress cases-the Supreme Court will have its hands full when, if ever, it attempts to articulate one grand unified theory in the area."7

Without articulating a unified general rule, courts allow recovery for NIED only in certain specialized cases such as "[w]here the negligence is of a type which will cause highly unusual as well as predictable emotional distress" or "when the negligence arises in a situation involving breach of fiduciary or quasi-fiduciary duties." 8

In fact, the California Supreme Court has allowed NIED actions of "direct victims" without physical injury in only three specific types of specialized factual situations: (1) the negligent mishandling of corpses (Christensen v. Superior Court, 54 Cal. 3d 868, 879 (1991)); (2) the negligent misdiagnosis of a syphilis, resulting in severe emotional distress to spouse (Molien v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, 27 Cal. 3d 916, 923 (1980)); and (3) the negligent breach of a duty arising out of a preexisting relationship (Burgess v. Superior Court, 2 Cal. 4th 1064, 1076 (1992)).

Whether plaintiffs may bring NIED claims in California under factual circumstances where they fear for their own safety but suffer no physical injury has presented a difficult challenge for the courts. What's more, recent medical diagnosis and research into psychological injuries such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) threaten to blur the distinction between purely psychological and physical injuries. The rationale that nervous shock equals physical injury destroys the traditional distinction between what the ordinary person would think of as emotional distress and palpable bodily injury.9

Wilson addresses, in part, the standards for pursuing a claim for NIED by a direct victim who has not suffered a physical injury. The plaintiff in Wilson brought a pure emotional distress claim against a utility company based on unsafe electrical wiring at her house. The plaintiff demonstrated at trial that Edison allowed uncontrolled stray electrical currents to enter her home for a period of years. The plaintiff was able to feel low levels of electricity when touching her shower fixtures, and Edison was aware of the stray voltage in the house but was unable to eliminate it. Following exposure to the electricity, plaintiff claimed that she experienced nausea and vomiting, physical weakness, muscle fatigue and spasms, and hand tremors.

At trial, plaintiff presented expert evidence that Edison violated standards in the electrical distribution industry by allowing low levels of electricity to be present at plaintiff's home. However, plaintiff presented no evidence that her physical symptoms were caused by exposure to stray voltage. Edison's expert testified that such exposure does not cause physical injuries and that the amount of electricity claimed is routinely used in a variety of medical procedures without injury.

The court in Wilson held that "because the only injury Wilson claimed in her loss was emotional distress, she was required to show that Edison's breach threatened physical injury to her." Wilson, 2015 WL 522578, at *19. Here, the court concluded that plaintiff's NIED claim failed because she failed to establish any breach of a duty by Edison that threatened physical injury to her. Id. at *20. The court explained that plaintiff could not proceed with her NIED claim because even though "it might be argued that the stray voltage found at Wilson's gas meter could demonstrate a potential threat of physical injury to the extent it could cause an explosion, the evidence showed that Edison acted to eliminate that threat." Id. at *19, n.30.

California courts will continue to be faced with a variety of factual circumstances where plaintiffs allege NIED but have not suffered physical injuries. Although there is no comprehensive rule as to when these claims may be permitted, the alleged breach of duty must threaten physical injury for the claim to survive.


1 Wooden v. Raveling, 61 Cal. App. 4th 1035, 1038 (1998).

2 See California Civil Jury Instruction 1620.

3 A different set of criteria applies to bystanders who witness physical injury to another.

4 Molien v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, 27 Cal. 3d 916, 923 (1980).

5 Lawson v. Management Activities, Inc., 69 Cal. App. 4th 652, 657-58 (1999).

6 Id. at 658-59.

7 Id. Ad 652, 656.

8 Branch v. Homefed Bank, 6 Cal. App. 4th 793, 800 (1992).

9 Waller v. Truck Ins. Exchange Inc., 11 Cal. 4th 1, 23 (1995).

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions