United States: Federal Circuit Patent Updates - January/February 2015

Last Updated: February 24 2015
Article by WilmerHale

View previous updates...

United States Technologies v. Centurytel Broadband Services (No. 2014-1347, 2/12/15) (Newman, Bryson, O'Malley)

February 12, 2015 9:30 AM

Bryson, J. Reversing judgment of collateral estoppel by a general jury verdict in a prior action. "It is well established that a general jury verdict can give rise to collateral estoppel only if it is clear that the jury necessarily decided a particular issue in the course of reaching its verdict. ... When there are several possible grounds on which a jury could have based its general verdict and the record does not make clear which ground the jury relied on, collateral estoppel does not attach to any of the possible theories." And "it was error to apply collateral estoppel to a general
jury verdict that could have rested on multiple grounds, simply because the first court held, in its JMOL ruling, that the evidence would have been sufficient to support the jury's verdict on either theory of liability presented to it."

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

Soverain Software LLC v. Victoria's Secret (No. 2012-1649, 2/12/15) (Dyk, Taranto, Hughes)

February 12, 2015 3:20 PM

Dyk, J. reversing judgment of infringement because the asserted claims were invalid by reason of issue preclusion from a judgment in another case. "[I]ssue preclusion applies even though the precluding judgment ... comes into existence while the case as to which preclusion is sought (this case) is on appeal." Rejecting the contentions that the patentee did not have a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the other case.

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

Fenner Investments, Ltd. v. Cellco Partnership (No. 2013-1640, 2/12/15) (Newman, Schall, Hughes)

February 12, 2015 12:20 PM

Newman, J. Affirming summary judgment of noninfringement. "Fenner argues that the[] purportedly limiting statements he made during prosecution do not limit the claims, arguing that the statements and the limitations discussed were not the basis for grant of the patent. However, the interested public has the right to rely on the inventor's statements made during prosecution, without attempting to decipher whether the examiner relied on them, or how much weight they were given."

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

Helferich Patent Licensing v. The New York Times (No. 2014-1196, 2/10/15) (Taranto, Bryson, Chen)

February 10, 2015 11:45 AM

Taranto, J. Reversing summary judgment of noninfringement under the doctrine of patent exhaustion. The district court "held that, by granting handset manufacturers patent licenses conferring broad authority to sell the handsets, Helferich had exhausted its ability to enforce its patents not only against acquirers of the handsets but also against the defendant content providers who use presumptively distinct inventions to manage content and deliver it to handset users. We reverse, concluding that patent exhaustion has not reached that far and should not be newly extended to do so in these cases." "The doctrine [of patent exhaustion] has never applied unless, at a minimum, the patentee's allegations of infringement, whether direct or indirect, entail infringement of the asserted claims by authorized acquirers— either because they are parties accused of infringement or because they are the ones allegedly committing the direct infringement required by the indirect infringement charged against other parties. Here ..., that is not so, because infringement of the content claims has not been asserted or shown to require that handset acquirers are practicing those claims."

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

Lexington Luminance LLC v. Amazon.com Inc. (No. 2014-1384, 2/9/15) (Lourie, Chen, Hughes)

February 9, 2015 5:10 PM

Lourie, J. Vacating judgment on the pleadings that the asserted claim was invalid as indefinite. An "open Markush group" in the claim of "said substrate is selected from the group comprising group IIIV, group IV, group II-VI elements and alloys, ZnO, spinel and sapphire" did not render the claim indefinite; "the reasonably ascertainable meaning of the contested claim language is that the substrate must contain one or more of the enumerated members of the claimed group." Also, a claim term of "the extended lattice defects" that had no antecedent in the claim did not render the claim indefinite.

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

In re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC (No. 2014-1301, 2/4/15) (Newman, Clevenger, Dyk)

February 4, 2015 1:50 PM

Dyk, J. Affirming Board determination in an inter partes review (IPR). "[W]e hold that we lack jurisdiction to review the PTO's decision to institute IPR. We affirm the Board's final determination, finding no error in the Board's claim construction under the broadest reasonable interpretation standard, the Board's obviousness determination, and the Board's denial of Cuozzo's motion to amend." "We conclude that § 314(d) prohibits review of the decision to institute IPR even after a final decision." "We conclude that Congress implicitly adopted the broadest reasonable interpretation standard in enacting the AIA." "Even if the broadest reasonable interpretation standard were not incorporated into the IPR provisions of the statute, the standard was properly adopted by PTO regulation." Newman, J., dissented.

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

Papst Licensing v. Fujifilm Corporation (No. 2014-1110, 2/2/15) (Taranto, Schall, Chen)

February 2, 2015 11:03 AM

Taranto, J. Vacating summary judgment of non-infringement of patents relating to transferring data between an input/output device and a computer, and remanding. "In the district court, [patent owner] opposed the construction it now opposes, and it was not required to state its opposition twice. [Patent owner] could not have given the district court the impression that it suddenly supported the construction when, in seeking a modification, it limited its request to a manifest error resting on a plain misapprehension of the record, rather than rehashing the broader arguments on claim construction that the court had fully considered. [Patent owner's] limited approach in seeking a modification was, indeed, commendably consistent with the general anti-repetition principle governing requests for reconsideration."

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

In re Imes (No. 2014-1206, 1/29/15) (Lourie, Moore, Chen)

January 29, 2015 10:14 AM

Moore, J. Reversing Board's finding of invalidity of claims related to communicating digital images and video over a network and remanding. "The Patent Office's construction of 'wireless' to include communications along metal contacts of the removable memory card and the computer system is inconsistent with the broadest reasonable interpretation in view of the specification." The Court also found that sending "a series of e-mails with attached still images is not the same as streaming video."

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc. (No. 13-854, 1/20/15)

January 20, 2015 1:09 PM

Breyer, J. Vacating judgment of indefiniteness and remanding. Although claim construction is reviewed de novo, a trial judge's resolution of underlying factual disputes should be reviewed under a "clear error" standard. "[W]hen the district court reviews only evidence intrinsic to the patent (the patent claims and specifications, along with the patent's prosecution history), the judge's determination will amount solely to a determination of law, and the Court of Appeals will review that construction de novo... In some cases, however, the district court will need to look beyond the patent's intrinsic evidence and to consult extrinsic evidence in order to understand, for example, the background science or the meaning of a term in the relevant art during the relevant time period... In cases where those subsidiary facts are in dispute, courts will need to make subsidiary factual findings about that extrinsic evidence... Accordingly, the question we have answered here concerns review of the district court's resolution of a subsidiary factual dispute that helps that court determine the proper interpretation of the written patent claim. The district judge, after deciding the factual dispute, will then interpret the patent claim in light of the facts as he has found them. This ultimate interpretation is a legal conclusion. The appellate court can still review the district court's ultimate construction of the claim de novo. But, to overturn the judge's resolution of an underlying factual dispute, the Court of Appeals must find that the judge, in respect to those factual findings, has made a clear error. Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 52(a)(6)." Justices Thomas and Alito dissented.

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

Neurorepair, Inc. v. Nath Law Group (No. 2013-1073, 1/15/15) (Wallach, Chen, Hughes)

January 15, 2015 10:22 AM

Wallach, J. Reversing district court and holding state law malpractice claim involving patent law representation improperly removed to federal court.

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

Bard Peripheral Vascular v. W.L. Gore & Associates (No. 2014-1114, 1/13/15) (Prost, Newman, Hughes)

January 13, 2015 3:40 PM

Prost, J. Affirming finding of willful infringement of patent related to vascular grafts. Inventorship defense was not objectively reasonable even though member of a prior appellate panel had dissented on the issue. Also rejecting a standing defense. Hughes, J. concurred, but urged en banc review. Newman, J. dissented.

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

Delano Farms Company v. California Table Grape Comm. (No. 2014-1030, 1/9/15) (Prost, Bryson, Hughes)

January 9, 2015 4:10 PM

Bryson, J. Affirming judgment that unauthorized planting of plant varieties did not constitute a public use invalidating patents directed to table grapes.

WilmerHale represented the appellant California Table Grape Commission.

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions