ARTICLE
24 February 2015

Supreme Court May Dilute EEOC’s Aggressive Legal Strategy

M
Mintz

Contributor

Mintz is a general practice, full-service Am Law 100 law firm with more than 600 attorneys. We are headquartered in Boston and have additional US offices in Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, San Diego, San Francisco, and Washington, DC, as well as an office in Toronto, Canada.
The article focuses on recent judicial defeats of the EEOC and their potential implications for employers who seek to challenge the EEOC’s approach.
United States Employment and HR

My colleague David Barmak was quoted in a Business Insurance article entitled Supreme Court May Dilute EEOC's Aggressive Legal Strategy, in which he explains the Supreme Court's heightened scrutiny of the EEOC's claims against employers. The article focuses on recent judicial defeats of the EEOC and their potential implications for employers who seek to challenge the EEOC's approach.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More