United States: 3 Cases That Significantly Impact Alimony Law

Last Updated: February 4 2015
Article by Robin M. Lynch Nardone

On January 30, 2015, the SJC issued three decisions with significant impact on the right to seek modification of an alimony order issued prior to the enactment of Massachusetts' Alimony Reform Act. The uncodified provisions of the alimony reform act are what the SJC has relied on in determining that only the durational limits on payment of alimony apply to alimony cases decided before March 1, 2012, while the retirement provisions and cohabitation provisions do not. Uncodified provisions of an act express the legislature's view on some aspect of the act's operation and are not the source of the substantive provisions of the law. Below are the details on the three cases.

Doktor v. Doktor

Joe and Dorothy were divorced in 1992 after a marriage of more than 20 years. They signed an agreement in which Joe agreed to pay alimony to Dorothy of $200 per week until her death or remarriage. The alimony provisions of the agreement merged into the Judgment of Divorce, meaning the alimony was subject to a future modification based upon a material change in circumstances.

In 2013, Joe filed a Complaint for Modification of his alimony obligation due to the fact that he was beyond full retirement age (he was then 69 years old), he had in fact retired, and Dorothy was no longer in need of alimony. Joe asserted that the provisions of the new alimony law codified at M.G.L. c. 208, sec. 49(f) applied to him. Section 49(f) provides "general term alimony orders shall terminate upon a payor reaching full retirement age."

The trial court dismissed Joe's complaint after trial in light of its determination that the retirement provision of the alimony law do not apply to cases that were settled before the law went into effect. The trial court also determined that Dorothy was still in need of alimony. Joe appealed the trial court's decision. The SJC agreed with the trial judge and held that the legislature intended the retirement provision to have prospective application only and thus the retirement provisions are not applicable to Joe's request for modification.

In determining that the legislature intended for the retirement provisions to apply only prospectively and not retroactively, the SJC looked to the uncodified provisions of the alimony reform act. Section 4 of the uncodified provisions of the Alimony Reform Act provides that Section 49 of M.G.L. c. 208 "shall apply prospectively, such that alimony judgments entered before March 1, 2012 shall terminate only under such judgments, under a subsequent modification or as otherwise provided for in this act." Section 4(b) provides the only exception, which is that alimony judgments that exceed the durational limits shall be modified without any additional material change of circumstances. Section 5 of the uncodified law provides the dates when alimony payors may file their modification actions if the durational limits have been exceeded. Section 6 then provides,

"Notwithstanding clauses (1) to (4) of section 5 of this act, any payor who has reached full retirement age, as defined in section 48 of chapter 208 of the General Laws, or who will reach full retirement age on or before March 1, 2015 may file a complaint for modification on or after March 1, 2013."

The SJC ruled that sections 4, 5 and 6 must be read together, not separately. The words "any payor who has reached full retirement age" apply only to a payor who has reached the durational limit and also reached or will reach full retirement age. The determination that sections 4, 5, and 6 of the uncodified sections of the alimony reform act must be read together defeats the rights of any payor who was married longer than 20 years from obtaining a modification based solely upon reaching full retirement age. Additionally, the durational limits do not apply to a payor who was married longer than 20 years.

While the SJC has declared that this is what the legislature intended when enacting the Alimony Reform Act, one must wonder whether that was truly the intent.

Rodman v. Rodman

George and Roberta Rodman were divorced in April 2008 after 39 years of marriage, at which time they signed an agreement calling for George to pay Roberta $1,539 per week in alimony until his death, her death, or Roberta's remarriage. The agreement merged with the Judgment of Divorce, allowing for modification upon a material change of circumstances. In November 2013, at the age of 66, George brought a Complaint for Modification seeking to terminate his alimony obligation based upon his reaching full retirement age pursuant to the Alimony Reform Act. George sought a temporary order terminating his alimony obligation and the trial judge reported the following issue to the Appeals Court: Whether or not G.L. c. 208, sec. 49(f) is to be applied retroactively to judgments entered before March 1, 2012. George asked for direct review by the SJC.

As in Doktor, the SJC held that the Legislature intended that only a claim for modification based on durational limits may (but will not always) apply retroactively to existing alimony judgments. General Laws c. 208, sec. 49(f) (the retirement provision) does not apply retroactively to alimony orders in divorce judgments or separation agreements that entered before March 1, 2012. Therefore, George is not entitled to relief.

Chin v. Merriot

In August 2011, after 12 years of marriage, Chester and Edith were divorced. At the time of the divorce, Chester was 67 years old and Edith was 69 years old. Chester and Edith signed an Agreement obligating Chester to pay alimony of $650 per month until the death of either party or Edith's remarriage. In March 2013, Chester filed a Complaint for Modification seeking to terminate his alimony obligation based upon (1) the fact that he was 68 and thus had reached full retirement age, and (2) the fact that Edith had been cohabiting with another person and maintaining a common household for more than three months. Chester argued that full retirement age is a basis for termination of alimony pursuant to M.G.L. c. 208, sec. 49(f) and cohabitation is a basis for suspension, reduction or termination of alimony pursuant to M.G.L. c. 208, sec. 49(d). Following a trial, the trial court judge determined that neither the retirement provisions nor the cohabitation provisions apply retroactively and Chester's Complaint was dismissed. Chester appealed.

For the same reasons set forth in Doktor and Rodman, the SJC held that the retirement provisions apply prospectively, not retroactively, and thus Chester could not obtain a modification based solely upon reaching full retirement age. Chester was also already retired at the time of the divorce, so his retirement from employment was not a material change in circumstances.

As to cohabitation, M.G.L. c. 208, sec. 49(d) provides,

"General term alimony shall be suspended, reduced or terminated upon the cohabitation of the recipient spouse when the payor shows that the recipient spouse has maintained a common household, as defined in this subsection, with another person for a continuous period of at least 3 months."

Again, looking to the uncodified provisions of the alimony reform act, the SJC held that the legislature's intent as expressed in uncodified section 4(b) is unambiguous: G.L. c. 208, sec. 48 to 55 (which includes the cohabitation provision) "shall not be deemed a material change of circumstances that warrants modification of the amount of existing alimony judgments; provided, however, that existing alimony judgments that exceed the durational limit shall be deemed a material change of circumstances that warrant modification."

The result is one that seems strikingly unfair and unreasonable – a payor who was divorced on March 1, 2012 may obtain a reduction, suspension or termination of his alimony obligation if the recipient shares a common household for more than three months, but a payor who was divorced one day earlier cannot obtain that same relief. While the SJC has made clear that this was the Legislature's intention, the result seems to fly in the face of what the Alimony Reform Act was intended to accomplish.

While the cohabitation provisions do not apply to divorces that took place prior to March 2012, those payors whose spouse is living with someone can still seek a modification based upon a material change in circumstances. If the cohabitation results in a material change in the recipient's need for alimony, the payor might be able to obtain a modification on that basis.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions