United States: Transfer Of All Substantial Rights In The Patent Results In Transferee Becoming The Effective Owner For Purposes Of Standing

In Azure Networks, LLC v. CSR PLC, No. 13-1459 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 6, 2014), the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's finding that Tri-County Excelsior Foundation ("Tri-County") be dismissed from the suit for lack of standing because Tri-County had effectively assigned Azure Networks, LLC ("Azure") U.S. Patent No. 7,756,129 ("the '129 patent"). The Federal Circuit also vacated the district court's judgment of noninfringement due to the district court's construction of the term "MAC address," and remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

Plaintiffs Azure and Tri-County filed suit against CSR PLC, Cambridge Silicon Radio International, LLC, Atheros Communications, Inc., Qualcomm Inc., Broadcom Corp., Marvell Semiconductor, Inc., Ralink Technology Corp. (Taiwan), and Ralink Technology Corp. (USA) (collectively "Appellees") for alleged infringement of the '129 patent. The '129 patent describes a wireless communication personal area network between a central hub device and surrounding peripheral devices that are in close proximity to the hub device. Relying on the specification, the district court concluded that the patentee acted as his own lexicographer and redefined the term "MAC address." The district court construed the term in the '129 patent as "a device identifier generated by the hub device." Slip op. at 5 (citation omitted). For purposes of appeal, Azure stipulated to a judgment of noninfringement under the district court's construction. The district court also granted the Appellees' motion to dismiss Tri-County from the suit for lack of standing. The district court concluded that Tri-County's title in the '129 patent and financial and reversionary interests were insufficient to confer standing upon Tri-County. Azure and Tri-County appealed Tri-County's dismissal.

"As the district court recognized, nothing about this relationship structure indicates that Tri-County has control over any aspect of litigation involving the '129 patent. Rather, it is clear that Azure is holding all the strings. In sum, Azure's exclusive right to sue, exclusive license, and freedom to sublicense are factors that strongly suggest that the Agreement constitutes an effective assignment." Slip op. at 11-12.

On appeal, the Federal Circuit held that the district court correctly granted the Appellees' motion to dismiss Tri-County due to lack of standing. The Court explained that "[e]ven if a patentee does not transfer legal title, it may transfer significant rights to the patent. When the patentee transfers rights, the 'party that has been granted all substantial rights under the patent is considered the owner regardless of how the parties characterize the transaction that conveyed those rights.'" Id. at 8 (quoting Speedplay, Inc. v. Bebop, Inc., 211 F.3d 1245, 1250 (Fed. Cir. 2000)). At the outset of its analysis, the Court stated that its "inquiry in this case is twofold: (1) whether Tri-County transferred all substantial rights under the '129 patent to Azure, making Azure the effective owner; and if so, (2) whether Tri-County may nevertheless join in an infringement suit brought by the licensee, but now effective owner, Azure."
Id. at 9.

For the purposes of standing, the Court explained that Tri-County had transferred all substantial rights to Azure, and, therefore, Azure was the effective owner for purposes of standing. In this regard, the Court stated that "it is not uncommon for a licensor to transfer to its licensee the exclusive right to enforce the patent." Id. at 11. Significantly, the Court noted, "Tri-County reserved no right to have control over, to veto, or to be notified of any of Azure's licensing or litigation activities. Retaining control of these activities is also critical to demonstrating that the patent has not been effectively assigned to the licensee." Id. After considering Tri-County's evidence demonstrating that it transferred something less than "all substantial rights," the Court determined that, "[a]fter weighing all the factors, we agree with the district court that Azure acquired significant rights under the '129 patent, including the right to enforce, to license, to control the licensing and litigation, to sublicense, to practice exclusively, and to maintain the patent." Id. at 18. The Court made clear that not only did Tri-County lack standing to bring suit, but more importantly, it lacked standing to even join the suit. "Because Tri-County does not have any exclusionary rights under the '129 patent, it lacks standing to join the suit as a coplaintiff. Tri-County's standing deficiency cannot be cured by adding Azure to the suit." Id. at 19.

Turning to the issue of claim construction, the Federal Circuit found that the district court interpreted "MAC address" too narrowly. The Federal Circuit particularly found that the claims in the '129 patent use "MAC address" in a consistent manner with the well-understood industry meaning. The Federal Circuit, explaining its finding, found that the claims of the '129 patent did not make explicit whether the "MAC address" is generated locally or universally. "For a patentee to act as his own lexicographer and give a term something other than its well-established meaning, he must 'clearly set forth a definition of the disputed term.'" Id. at 22 (quoting CCS Fitness, Inc. v. Brunswick Corp., 288 F.3d 1359, 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2002)). In the present case, the Court found that "the specification did not re-coin an established term of art by redefining it to have a narrower definition than the traditional MAC address." Id. Particularly, the Court determined that "'MAC address' has a 'clear, settled, and objective' meaning to a person of ordinary skill in the art . . . [a]nd when read in context, it becomes clear that that 'Media Access (MAC) address' in the specification has the same meaning as that of a traditional MAC address: it is a device identifier." Id. at 23 (citations omitted). Thus, the Federal Circuit adopted Azure's proposed construction of "MAC address" as "an address that uniquely identifies a device or group of devices on a shared communication medium." Id. at 25.

Accordingly, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Tri-County, vacated the district court's judgment of noninfringement, and remanded for further proceedings as outlined in its opinion.

Judge Mayer concurred-in-part and dissented-in-part. Judge Mayer agreed with the majority's "thorough and well-reasoned analysis of the standing question." Mayer Dissent at 2. Judge Mayer, however, dissented from Section II of the opinion regarding the construction of the term "MAC address." According to Judge Mayer, the specification was replete with references of how the "MAC address" is indeed "an address assigned to a peripheral device by a hub device," id., and discloses no other method for network communication," id. at 3-4. Accordingly, Judge Mayer concluded that fundamental errors infected the Court's decision to expand the '129 patent to cover an invention neither claimed nor described by the patentees, and "the court has no warrant to vastly expand the term to cover any address that uniquely identifies a device on a network." Id.

Judges: Reyna, Mayer (dissenting-in-part), Chen (author)

[Appealed from E.D. Tex., Judge Schneider]

This article previously appeared in Last Month at the Federal Circuit, December 2014

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
16 Jan 2019, Conference, Washington, DC, United States

Finnegan partner Lionel Lavenue will present “The Technology Accelerates: IP Issues at the Cutting Edge” during the Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Aviation Law & Insurance Symposium.

17 Jan 2019, Webinar, Washington, DC, United States

As a part of Strafford Publications’ webinar series, Finnegan partners Erika Arner and Michael Flibbert

will discuss best practices for preparing a PTAB case for appeal to the Federal Circuit.

22 Jan 2019, Webinar, Washington, DC, United States

As part of Strafford Publications’ webinar series, Finnegan partners Shana Cyr and Mark Feldstein will provide essential updates on FDA practice and patent law relating to biologics and biosimilars.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions