United States: DOJ Issues Opinion, Provides (Some) Comfort On Successor Liability

In a recent Opinion Procedure Release (OPR), Number 14-02, the U.S. Department of Justice expressly limited successor liability for a US company purchasing a non-US company that had paid bribes in the past.  In so doing, DOJ may have given a little bit of comfort to US companies and issuers thinking about purchasing non-US companies.  But as described below, we emphasize "little bit."

Relevant Facts.  The DOJ issued OPR 14-02 on November 7, 2014 in response to a request from a US company (the Buyer) seeking to acquire a non-US company and its wholly-owned subsidiary (the Target).  As an issuer of securities in the United States, the Buyer is subject to both (i) the anti-bribery and (ii) the books and records and internal controls provisions of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).

The Buyer asked the DOJ whether it would take enforcement action against the Buyer, post-acquisition, for conduct by the Target that occurred pre-acquisition.  That conduct, according to the OPR, was fairly sketchy: over $100,000 in payments raised compliance questions, including payments to government officials to obtain permits and licenses, and to state-controlled media personnel to minimize negative publicity.  Payments apparently took the form of gifts, cash donations, and charitable contributions and sponsorships.  (There is no indication that the payments included that peculiarly problematic type of expense, entertainment and hospitality, but maybe DOJ was just being nice.)

In addition to myriad problematic payments, the Target's books and records were in shambles.  An accounting firm hired by the Buyer to assist in due diligence of the Target could not locate or identify many underlying records.  Expenses were improperly and inaccurately classified in what books the Target did keep.  And the Target maintained no compliance policies or procedures.  So it is perhaps not surprising that, as the DOJ notes, the Target's employees demonstrated poor understanding and awareness of anti-bribery laws and regulations.

In light of its due diligence, the Buyer concluded that the Target was an anti-bribery compliance train wreck.  It seems correspondingly safe to conclude that the Target may have violated applicable anti-bribery laws.  Yet beauty being in the eye of the beholder, the Buyer went to the DOJ for guidance.

OPRs Generally.  The DOJ issues OPRs to respond to requests for such guidance.  In each OPR, the DOJ reviews a particular series of facts and then declares its enforcement intentions related to such facts.  On average, DOJ has issued between one and two OPRs per year since the early 1980s.  While the fact patterns addressed in OPRs change, DOJ's explicit qualifications to every OPR remain constant: the opinion (i) is not binding, and (ii) can only be relied on by the requesting party, and only if there are no changes to the facts and circumstances as presented to DOJ.

We are sometimes surprised that companies do not take more advantage of the OPR process.  After all, it is about the closest a company can come to obtaining safe harbor from prosecution under a particular set of facts.  When we have suggested to companies that they consider seeking an opinion from DOJ, the response is often that they do not want to be on DOJ's proverbial radar screen.  Apparently the fear is that by reaching out to DOJ about a ticklish situation, it is more likely that DOJ will reach back out in the future to pursue an enforcement action.  There is also concern that DOJ may respond with the wrong answer, i.e., that something is in fact a violation and would trigger enforcement action.  Companies may decide they would rather take their chances on particular conduct about which reasonable minds can differ.

Whatever the reason, it is useful that parties – even a very limited number of parties – do occasionally go to DOJ seeking guidance.  Where official government guidance has traditionally been lacking, notwithstanding the publication in 2012 of the Resource Guide to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, these occasional insights into the DOJ enforcement mindset are illuminating.

DOJ's Conclusion – Three Key Takeaways.  Returning to OPR 14-02, we think there are the three key takeaways to consider:

First, DOJ stated that it would not take enforcement action against the Buyer for conduct that occurred prior to the acquisition because that conduct was not subject to the FCPA when it occurred.  DOJ also expressly acknowledged that the Buyer had developed a plan consisting of pre- and post-acquisition measures to address and remediate any past instances of bribery by the Target.  (The DOJ stated that it "expresses no view as to the adequacy or reasonableness of [the Buyer's] integration of the Target ...")  This finding is a relief to any US company or issuer thinking about an acquisition of a non-US company, especially from a country in which bribery is perceived to be widespread.

Second, the DOJ provided useful general guidance – "the Department encourages companies" – about what constitutes an effective FCPA compliance process in the M&A context.  The process should include: (i) thorough, risk-based due diligence; (ii) implementation, "as quickly as practicable," of the acquiring company's code of conduct and compliance policies; (iii) anti-bribery training for directors, employees, and third-party agents and partners of the acquired company; (iv) an FCPA-specific audit "as quickly as practicable"; and (v) disclosure to the DOJ of any corrupt payments discovered during diligence.  While not a safe harbor, DOJ notes that such a process "may, among several other factors, determine whether and how [it] would seek to impose post-acquisition successor liability in case of a putative violation."  Notably, DOJ seems to recognize that all compliance measures cannot be taken on day one post-acquisition – "as quickly as practicable" is pretty quick, but it is not immediately.

Finally, we note that DOJ apparently reached its conclusion at least in part based on the belief that, post-acquisition, no contracts or other assets acquired through bribery by the Target would remain in operation or generate a financial benefit for the Buyer.  This makes sense.  What we find interesting is the inverse of this statement, namely, that if there were a contract or other asset obtained through bribery, and the Buyer acquired that asset and generated revenue from it, DOJ might try to exercise jurisdiction over the Buyer even if the bribery occurred outside US jurisdiction.

Perhaps this is too strict an interpretation of DOJ's language in the OPR.  But read literally, the OPR seems to suggest that if a company subject to FCPA jurisdiction (Company X) were to acquire an asset from a company not subject to FCPA jurisdiction (Company Y), if Company Y acquired the asset through bribery, and Company X were to continue operating that asset post-acquisition, the DOJ might seek to impose liability on Company X.  Such an enforcement action would seem somewhat incongruous with DOJ's position that a corrupt action not subject to the FCPA would not expose a subsequent acquiror to FCPA liability.

Conclusion.  The regulated community is better off thanks to this OPR, since any guidance from DOJ is helpful, even when it leads to other questions.  Identification by the government of key elements in an effective compliance process in the M&A context is useful.  And it is useful to better understand how companies can insulate themselves from acquiring successor liability for an FCPA violation.

It is nonetheless unfortunate that DOJ continues to be unwilling to articulate a specific safe harbor standard by which companies can assure themselves of non-prosecution.  Short of that, and notwithstanding the guidance in this (and other OPRs), companies will continue to have to use their best judgment to make tough FCPA compliance decisions.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
31 Jan 2019, Other, Los Angeles, United States

Invites you to join us for a private cooking class hosted by Parties that Cook!

31 Jan 2019, Conference, Los Angeles, United States

The Southern California Association of Corporate Counsel's In-House Counsel Conference

6 Feb 2019, Other, Los Angeles, United States

Please join Sheppard Mullin for cocktails & hors d'oeuvres during The Wind Power Finance & Investment Summit 2019

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions