ARTICLE
15 December 2014

When Serving Process By Mail, You Can't Send It To The Wrong Address

FL
Foley & Lardner

Contributor

Foley & Lardner LLP looks beyond the law to focus on the constantly evolving demands facing our clients and their industries. With over 1,100 lawyers in 24 offices across the United States, Mexico, Europe and Asia, Foley approaches client service by first understanding our clients’ priorities, objectives and challenges. We work hard to understand our clients’ issues and forge long-term relationships with them to help achieve successful outcomes and solve their legal issues through practical business advice and cutting-edge legal insight. Our clients view us as trusted business advisors because we understand that great legal service is only valuable if it is relevant, practical and beneficial to their businesses.
If personal service of a summons and complaint cannot be accomplished, a plaintiff in Wisconsin is permitted to serve process by publication.
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

If personal service of a summons and complaint cannot be accomplished, a plaintiff in Wisconsin is permitted to serve process by publication. A plaintiff serving by publication must also mail a copy of the summons and complaint to the defendant's address when known or ascertainable. Wis. Stat. § 801.11.

In O'Donnell v. Kaye, No. 13AP2651 (Ct. App. Dec. 3, 2014), the latest foray by Wisconsin's court of appeals into the service-by-publication rule, the court held that pleadings must be sent to the correct address when served by publication and mail.

When William O'Donnell sued Roxanne Kaye, he correctly listed her address in his complaint. After a process server was unable to serve Kaye, O'Donnell published legal notice and mailed a copy of the summons and complaint to Kaye. The mail was incorrectly addressed, both as to house number (W138 instead of W136) and as to street name (Avenue instead of Drive). Kaye did obtain a copy of the complaint and answered it, listing her correct address in the answer. O'Donnell argued that the mailed copy must, therefore, have been delivered, but Kaye represented that she obtained a copy from the court file. The trial court and the court of appeals did not resolve the issue.

Unsurprisingly the court of appeals held that mailing a complaint to the wrong address was a fundamental defect in service. The court of appeals placed the blame for the mistaken address solely on O'Donnell, who knew Kaye's correct address but nevertheless sent mail to a different address. The court's analysis emphasized the act of mailing over the receipt of process. Kaye, after all, did obtain a copy of the complaint. The court explained: "It might be a different case if the mail were sent to the correct address, but somewhere along the line, an error by the postal service, shenanigans by the defendant or some other third party interfered with delivery to the defendant."

If the mail is not sent to the correct address, and if the correct address is known, the rule is clear: Service by publication and mailing requires that the mail be properly addressed.

What isn't clear is why Kaye's answer didn't amount to a waiver of the defenses of lack of personal jurisdiction and insufficient process. See Wis. Stat. § 802.06(8)(a) (challenge to personal jurisdiction or service must be raised in answer or by motion before answer).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More