United States: Disclosing The Identity Of A Complainant Can Constitute Retaliation Under The Sarbanes-Oxley Act

Last Updated: November 26 2014
Article by Michael Stevens and Karen S. Vladeck

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently affirmed a decision of the Administrative Review Board of the Department of Labor, which had determined that a company's disclosure of the identity of an SEC whistleblower who had caused an official investigation, resulting in the employee's workplace ostracism, constituted illegal retaliation under § 806 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act (SOX). Halliburton, Inc. v. Admin. Review Bd., No. 13-60323, 2014 WL 5861790 (5th Cir. Nov. 12, 2014).


In 2005, Halliburton, Inc. (Halliburton) hired Anthony Menendez (Menendez) as Director of Technical Accounting Research and Training in the Finance and Accounting Department of the Company's Houston office. In that role, Menendez monitored accounting issues and gave advice and training to field accountants. He reported directly to Halliburton's Chief Accounting Officer (CAO).

In July 2005, Menendez raised concerns that some of Halliburton's accounting practices involving revenue recognition did not conform with generally accepted accounting principles. Menendez circulated a memorandum on the revenue recognition issue to colleagues within his department, including the CAO. The CAO met with Menendez and suggested that, although the memorandum was good, Menendez was not a "team player" and needed to work more closely with colleagues to resolve any concerns over accounting practices. Halliburton ordered a new study of the revenue recognition issue and, in October 2005, the study concluded that the Company's practices were proper. That same month, Menendez sought another meeting with the CAO regarding the revenue recognition practices, but he declined to meet with Menendez again.

Menendez then made a series of complaints regarding the accounting practices. First, he complained anonymously to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC); then to Halliburton's Vice President of Financial Controls, who said his complaint lacked merit. Menendez then took his complaint to Halliburton's Board of Directors, who forwarded the complaint to the General Counsel.

Around this time, the SEC informed the General Counsel that it was investigating Menendez's complaint, but did not identify the complainant. But, the General Counsel, having seen Menendez's internal complaint, surmised that Menendez must have been the source of the SEC complaint as well. The General Counsel sent an email to Menendez's boss and others, instructing them to preserve documents relevant to the SEC's investigation, as directed, because "the SEC has opened an inquiry into the allegations of Mr. Menendez." That same day, his boss forwarded the email identifying Menendez as the whistleblower to 15 members of Menendez's work group, including Menendez himself, thus alerting them to the SEC's investigation and to the fact that Menendez had complained to the SEC about the propriety of their accounting practices.

Menendez claimed that he was horrified when he saw the email disclosing his identity as the SEC complainant, and he described that day as one of the worst in his life. He claimed that colleagues began to treat him differently, generally avoiding him. Menendez missed work frequently after the revelation, showing up at the office only sporadically and later requested paid administrative leave "given the current environment and circumstances involving the SEC investigation." The Company granted the request.

On September 19, 2006, the SEC recommended no enforcement action against Halliburton. On October 17, 2006, Menendez resigned from Halliburton, stating in his resignation letter that he could not "professionally and ethically" return to the Company while it persisted in accounting practices that, he continued to maintain, were improper.

The Department of Labor Proceedings

On May 8, 2006, Menendez filed a complaint with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) of the Department of Labor pursuant to § 806 of SOX, the antiretaliation provision, alleging that Halliburton retaliated against him because of his complaints about the Company's accounting procedures by disclosing his identity as the whistleblower to his colleagues. OSHA dismissed the complaint, and Menendez requested a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge. Following a hearing that included several days of testimony, the Judge issued a decision and order dismissing the complaint. The Judge concluded, among other things, that, although Menendez's reports to the SEC and the Company were protected conduct, the disclosure of his identity was not an "adverse action" (a required element of an antiretaliation claim under SOX) because none of the workplace harm Menendez suffered as a result of being identified as the whistleblower rose to the level of being "materially adverse." Menendez appealed.

On appeal, the Review Board reversed, holding that Halliburton had retaliated against Menendez by releasing his name. The Board remanded to the Administrative Law Judge for findings on whether Menendez's protected activity was a "contributing factor" in Halliburton's disclosure of his identity and whether Halliburton had satisfied its burden of establishing, as an affirmative defense to the retaliation claim, that "legitimate business reasons" mandated the disclosure of Menendez's identity.

On remand, the Judge held that Halliburton had shown a legitimate business reason for disclosing Menendez's identity as the whistleblower. Menendez again appealed. The Review Board reversed the Administrative Law Judge on the affirmative defense, thus holding Halliburton liable for retaliation. Halliburton then petitioned the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals for review.

The Fifth Circuit Decision

Section 806 of SOX, codified at 18 U.S.C. § 1514A, creates a private cause of action for employees of publicly-traded companies who are retaliated against for engaging in certain protected activity. The statute states, in relevant part:

"No [public company] may discharge, demote, suspend, threaten, harass, or in any other manner discriminate against an employee in the terms and conditions of employment because of [certain protected whistleblowing activity]." 18 U.S.C. § 1514A(a).

To prevail on a retaliation claim under that provision, the employee must prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that (1) he engaged in protected whistleblowing activity; (2) the employer knew that he engaged in the protected activity; (3) he suffered an adverse action; and (4) the protected activity was a contributing factor in the adverse action.

Halliburton first contested that releasing Menendez's name constituted adverse action. The Court of Appeals disagreed. The Court explained that the key analysis is whether the action would dissuade an employee from making a complaint. The Court reasoned that in a workplace environment such as Menendez's where collaboration is an important part of the job, "the employer's targeted disclosure to the whistleblower's colleagues that the whistleblower had reported them to the authorities for alleged wrongdoing and has caused them to become the subject of an official investigation, thus creating an environment of ostracism, well might dissuade a reasonable employee from whistleblowing."

Halliburton also contested whether the protected conduct was a "contributing factor" in the employer's adverse action. The Review Board found that Menendez's whistleblowing was indeed a "contributing factor" in Halliburton's disclosure of his identity as the whistleblower. Halliburton contended that, as a matter of law, it is not enough that the protected conduct be a "contributing factor" in the employer's adverse action. Rather, according to Halliburton, an employee must prove a "wrongfully-motivated causal connection."

The Court again disagreed with Halliburton, chastising the Company by stating "Given the facts of this case, it is difficult to see how a different outcome [than the Review Board's conclusion] could have been possible." The Court explained that a whistleblower need not demonstrate the existence of a retaliatory motive on the part of the employer in order to establish that his protected conduct was a contributing factor to the personnel action. The Court also affirmed the non-economic, compensatory damages that the Review Board had awarded Menendez for emotional distress.


The Halliburton case is a clear reminder to employers that "adverse action" can take many forms; what may have seemed like an innocuous litigation hold letter can result in a retaliation claim if not properly handled. If you have any questions about this case, please contact the authors of this post, or the Arent Fox professional who usually handles your matters.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions