United States: RE: Bakken Crude-by-Rail: Environmental Groups Ask New York State To Regulate DOT-111 Tank Cars

A recent state-law challenge by environmental groups to an aspect of crude-by-rail transportation has teed up the question of federal supremacy over railroad regulation. Because federal law generally preempts state regulation of railroads, the environmental groups must fashion their state-law challenges to invoke a traditional area of state regulation – in many instances, land use.[1] But a recent petition filed by environmental groups in New York State attempts to finagle state regulation over an aspect of rail transportation traditionally preempted by federal law.[2]

The bottom line is this: Bakken players will continue to face state-law challenges to any midstream or end-user project that transports or receives crude by rail. Effectively managing and combating these challenges will require both Bakken players' and trade associations' proactive involvement to monitor and attack environmental groups' state-law challenges that push the boundaries of permissible state regulation.

With a high-volume horizontal hydraulic fracturing moratorium, New York State represents one of the most unfriendly environments for unconventional shale development.[3] It comes as no surprise, then, that the state has emerged as a battleground for Bakken crude-by-rail transportation.

New York State officials have been active in calling on other states and federal regulators to tighten crude-by-rail safety.[4] Most recently, New York State asked North Dakota to implement regulations that require "stabilization" of Bakken crude prior to shipment.[5] Increasingly hostile opposition plagues projects involving crude-by-rail. One company's application to modify an existing facility stalled because the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation ("NYSDEC") has extended the public comment period four times.[6] And the same company completely abandoned a separate permit application for an oil terminal expansion.[7] Fueled by these results, environmental groups are pushing harder in New York State.

On October 20, 2014, Earthjustice, on behalf of numerous petitioners, filed a petition with the NYSDEC requesting a summary abatement order "prohibiting receipt and storage of Bakken crude oil in DOT-111 tank cars" at two transloading facilities and throughout the state of New York.[8]

The petition claims to invoke the state's regulatory power over the transloading facilities.[9] But by seeking a blanket prohibition on crude oil "receipt and storage" in DOT-111s, the thrust of the petition actually asks the state to regulate a vessel in which federal regulations allow railroads to transport crude.

If New York State regulators were to acquiesce to the petition's demands, the action would impermissibly encroach on federal supremacy over the regulation of railroads.[10] Although a proposed federal rule would phase out crude oil transportation in outdated tank cars, current federal law authorizes the transportation of most crude in DOT-111s.[11] Because federal law preempts state regulation over railroads, states lack the power to prohibit the vessel in which railroads carry crude oil to transloading facilities.

Anticipating the federal preemption issue, the petition advances two counterarguments. First, the petition argues that federal law governs transloading facilities only when rail carriers own them and that the challenged facilities belong to non-rail carriers.[12] But the petition mischaracterizes the scope of its request. Prohibiting the "receipt and storage" of Bakken crude in DOT-111s at the challenged facilities would effectively prevent federally authorized use of the tank cars. The petition's request impermissibly reaches past mere regulation of the transloading facility by, in effect, dictating to rail carriers which tank cars New York State will permit.

Second, the petition relies on the Second Circuit's decision in Berman Enterprises, Inc. v. Jorling[13] for the proposition that the NYSDEC may issue summary abatement orders even in areas that federal law preempts.[14] But the petition conveniently ignores both the facts of Jorling and the narrow holding of the Second Circuit.

In Jorling, the NYSDEC issued a summary abatement order that banned a company's use of individual barges to transport crude oil, in part because one barge sank and the company had repeatedly violated state law.[15] In stark factual contrast here, the petition seeks to invoke summary abatement powers to ban an entire class of transportation vessel – DOT-111 tank cars – from service within New York State.[16] In Jorling, the district court specifically upheld the state's power to regulate barge licensing because "[p]articular classes of vessels are not barred from New York harbors."[17] But the petition asks the NYSDEC to bar a class of transportation vessel, which puts the current situation in direct conflict with a crucial fact in Jorling.

Furthermore, the Second Circuit never actually affirmed the district court's preemption holding.[18] The Second Circuit noted that the district court's "scholarly analysis" rejected the federal preemption claims.[19] But the court stated, in dicta with no discussion or analysis, only that: "Preliminarily, we agree with Judge Weinstein's rejection of Berman's claim that federal law preempts any state regulation of Berman's barges in New York Harbor."[20]

But the court then continued to affirm the district court's dismissal of Berman's claims based on grounds entirely unrelated to federal preemption.[21] The petition's assertion that the Second Circuit affirmed New York State's power to issue summary abatement orders in areas that federal law preempts misconstrues the Jorling opinion.

Even though the petition rests on untenable legal grounds, and the NYSDEC will likely take no action on it, the petition still signals a potential trend that environmental groups will increasingly stretch the boundaries of states' regulatory powers to attack the transportation of crude oil by rail.

Rather than dismiss these questionable challenges, Bakken players that rely on crude-by-rail transportation should actively monitor these emerging challenges and, where permitted, intervene to aggressively argue that federal law preempts state regulation over most aspects of crude-by-rail transportation.

[1] See Rapanos v. United States, 547 U.S. 715, 738 (2006) (Scalia, J., plurality opinion) ("Regulation of land use . . . is a quintessential state and local power.").
[2] See EARTHJUSTICE, Petition for Summary Abatement Order: Receipt and Storage of Bakken Crude Oil in DOT-lll Tank Cars at Albany Terminals Operated by Global Companies, LLC and Buckeye Partners, LP (2014).
[3] See Colin Sullivan, NATURAL GAS: N.Y. Enviros Demand Cuomo Scrap Fracking Environmental Impact Study, E & E PUBLISHING (July 9, 2014), ("A moratorium in the Empire State against high-volume horizontal fracking has been in place since 2008.").
[4] See State's Actions on Transport of Crude Oil, N.Y. State Dep't of Envtl. Conservation, (last visited Nov. 13, 2014) (listing New York State's actions to improve crude-by-rail safety).
[5] Letter from Joseph J. Martens, Comm'r of N.Y. State Dep't of Envtl. Conservation, & Joan McDonald, Comm'r of N.Y. State Dep't of Transp., to Jack Dalrymple, Governor of North Dakota (Oct. 21, 2014). See Blake Sobczak, BAKKEN SHALE: N.Y. Tells N.D.: Clean Up Your Crude, E & E Publishing (Oct. 22, 2014).
[6] See State's Actions on Transport of Crude Oil, N.Y. State Dep't of Envtl. Conservation, (last visited Nov. 13, 2014) ("Due to broad public and community interest in the activities, [NYS]DEC further extended the comment period. On May 21, the comment period was further extended to August 1. On July 30, the comment period was again extended to September 30. On September 26, [NYS]DEC extended the comment period to November 30.").
[7] Energywire, TRANSPORT: N.Y. Crude-by-rail Terminal Plans Dropped, E & E Publishing (Nov. 13, 2014).[8] See Earthjustice, supra note 2, at 31. A summary abatement order allows the NYSDEC commissioner to order a person to "discontinue, abate or alleviate" a condition that "presents an imminent danger to the health or welfare of the people of the state or results in or is likely to result in irreversible or irreparable damage to natural resources." N.Y. Envtl. Conserv. Law § 71-0301 (2014).
[9] See Earthjustice, supra note 2, at 28 ("The Albany Terminals are primarily subject to state, not federal, regulatory authority.").
[10] See generally Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act of 1995, Pub. L. No. 104-88, 109 Stat. 803 (1995) (preempting state regulation over railroads).
[11] See Hazardous Materials: Enhanced Tank Car Standards and Operational Controls for High-Hazard Flammable Trains, 79 Fed. Reg. 45016, 45025 (Aug. 1, 2014) (listing the DOT-111 tank car as an available option to ship all packing group designations of Class 3 flammable liquids, which includes most crude oils).
[12] See Earthjustice, supra note 2, at 29 (citing Hi Tech Trans, LLC – Petition for Declaratory Order – Newark, N.J., STB F.D. No. 34192, 2003 WL 21952136, at *4 (S.T.B. Aug. 14, 2003)).
[13] Berman Enter., Inc. v. Jorling, 3 F.3d at 602 (2d Cir. 1993); see also Berman Enter., Inc. v. Jorling, 793 F. Supp. 408 (E.D.N.Y. 1992).
[14] See Earthjustice, supra note 2, at 5 ("Moreover, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has sustained the Commissioner's summary abatement powers in the face of a federal preemption challenge in remarkably similar circumstances involving imminent harm from transportation of oil and sludge in barges."); see id. at 29–30 ("Significantly, the Second Circuit has affirmed [NYS]DEC's use of a summary abatement order in circumstances analogous to the present matter. . . . In an analysis of federal preemption that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit later affirmed and lauded as 'scholarly,' the district court rejected the barge owners' preemption claim . . . ." (internal citations omitted) (emphasis added)).
[15] Jorling, 793 F. Supp. at 411.
[16] See Earthjustice, supra note 2, at 31 ("Petitioners respectfully request that the Commissioner immediately issue a Summary Abatement Order prohibiting receipt and storage of Bakken crude oil in DOT-111 tank bars by Global and Buckeye at the Albany Terminals, or at any other facility in the State of New York . . . ." (emphasis added)).
[17] Jorling, 793 F. Supp. at 411 (emphasis added).
[18] Jorling, 3 F.3d at 606.
[19] Id.
[20] Id.
[21] Id. at 607–08

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions