United States: Ninth Circuit Offers Guidance To Defendants Seeking To Establish Removal Jurisdiction

The Supreme Court recently denied a petition for a writ of certiorari in Leite v. Crane Co., 49 F.3d 1117 (9th Cir. 2014), cert. denied, 574 U.S. ___ (2014) (No. 14-119), a case in which the Ninth Circuit established the framework for resolving challenges to removal jurisdiction. The cert denial presents an opportunity to examine the Ninth Circuit's ruling and the guidance it offers to defendants seeking to successfully remove to federal court.


Leite involved product liability claims by plaintiffs who had worked as machinists at the Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard. The plaintiffs filed two suits against Crane Co. in state court, alleging that Crane had failed to warn them of the dangers posed by asbestos used in and around equipment supplied by Crane to the U.S. Navy.

Crane removed under the federal officer removal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1). In pertinent part, Section 1442(a)(1) authorizes the removal of a civil action against any person "acting under" a U.S. officer "for or relating to any act under color of such office." To remove under this statute, a defendant must show that (1) it is a "person" within the meaning of the statute; (2) there is a causal nexus between the plaintiff's claims and actions taken by the defendant at a federal officer's direction; and (3) it has a "colorable" federal defense. Crane alleged that it satisfied each of these requirements in light of its government contractor defense.


After both district courts denied the plaintiffs' motions to remand, the Ninth Circuit certified the orders for interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). The court noted that the cases raised "several novel procedural questions" involving the framework within which a court must analyze a challenge to removal jurisdiction—particularly removal under Section 1442(a)(1).

The Ninth Circuit answered these questions by reference to the procedurally comparable context of a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). As the court pointed out, 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a), the statute governing the procedure for removal, tracks the language of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(1) by requiring the defendant to provide a "short and plain statement of the grounds for removal." Thus, like a plaintiff alleging subject matter jurisdiction, a defendant seeking removal must meet the pleading standards set forth in Iqbal and Twombly by alleging sufficient facts, rather than mere legal conclusions, supporting each of the elements for removal jurisdiction.


The Leite court also explained that, like a Rule 12(b)(1) motion, "a plaintiff's motion to remand may raise either a facial attack or a factual attack on the defendant's jurisdictional allegations."

A facial attack accepts the truth of the defendant's allegations but claims that they "are insufficient on their face to invoke federal jurisdiction." A district court must resolve a facial attack as it would resolve a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6): The court must determine whether the defendant's allegations are legally sufficient to invoke federal jurisdiction, accepting the defendant's jurisdictional allegations as true and drawing all reasonable inferences in the defendant's favor.

By contrast, a factual attack challenges the truth of the defendant's factual allegations supporting removal, "usually by introducing evidence outside the pleadings." In the face of a factual attack, the defendant must support its "jurisdictional allegations with 'competent proof' . . . under the same evidentiary standard that governs in the summary judgment context." Thus, the defendant must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that it has met each requirement for removal jurisdiction. Unlike a motion for summary judgment, however, the district court may resolve factual disputes upon which the existence of jurisdiction turns (unless the jurisdictional issue is intertwined with an issue related to the merits of the plaintiff's claims, in which case the court must leave that dispute for the trier of fact).

Applying these standards to the motions to remand in Leite, the court explained that the plaintiffs had raised a factual attack by challenging the truth of Crane's jurisdictional allegations. The plaintiffs argued that Crane lacked a factual basis for the government contractor defense and that no causal nexus exited between their claims and the actions that Crane took under a federal officer. The Ninth Circuit disagreed. Relying on the affidavits submitted with Crane's notice of removal, the court held that Crane proved by a preponderance of the evidence both requirements for federal officer removal. The court explicitly expressed no view on the merits of Crane's claims, stating only that Crane met its evidentiary burden for purposes of defeating the motions to remand. Thus, the court affirmed the rulings of the district courts.


Defendants seeking to remove cases in the Ninth Circuit can now better anticipate how a district court will analyze a motion to remand. To avoid remand, defendants must not only plead facts sufficient to withstand a 12(b)(6) analysis but also be prepared to prove those allegations by a preponderance of the evidence. Notably, although the defendant in Leite attached its evidentiary support to the removal papers themselves, the court did not hold that all defendants must do this; Leite indicates that a defendant may combat a factual challenge by submitting evidence after the plaintiff moves to remand.

Beyond that broad guidance and its application to the facts in Leite, the Ninth Circuit's ruling offers little insight as to how its framework will apply in specific situations. For instance, many aviation defendants have removed under the federal officer removal statute in cases implicating certification conduct by FAA designees—whether it be an individual designee employed by the organization, such as a Designated Airworthiness Representative (DAR), Designated Engineering Representative (DER), or Designated Manufacturing Inspection Representative (DMIR), or the organization itself, acting pursuant to its Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) status.

Defendants in these cases have argued that the federal designees "acted under" a federal officer for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1). And courts have reached inconsistent results in evaluating motions to remand. In a number of cases, courts have accepted the argument that an FAA designee "acts under" a federal officer by participating in certification or approving a defendant's products. Other courts have reached the opposite conclusion.

The Ninth Circuit has not yet addressed this issue, and Leite offers little insight as to how the court will view it. But Leite does suggest that defendants should anticipate facial, rather than factual, attacks against removal under the FAA-designee theory. Leite also suggests that such challenges will hinge less on the "colorable federal defense" element and more on the question of whether a DAR, DER, DMIR, or ODA organization "acts under" a federal officer or agency. Plaintiffs can point to the body of cases rejecting this basis for removal to argue that, accepting all allegations as true, the defendant cannot satisfy the "acting under" requirement as a matter of law. To align themselves with the cases accepting this theory of removal, defendants' removal papers should include as much factual information as possible regarding the FAA's oversight of the designee at issue. Generalities clearly will not suffice.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions