ARTICLE
6 November 2014

DOD Competition Guidelines Set To Create Further IP Focus

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

BakerHostetler logo
Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
The Department of Defense published new competition guidelines outlining strategies for contracting officers to increase competition with various types of acquisition programs.
United States Government, Public Sector

On August 22, the U.S. Department of Defense ("DOD") published new competition guidelines outlining strategies for contracting officers to increase competition with various types of acquisition programs. The guidelines were developed as a result of the DOD's Better Buying Power 2.0—Achieving Greater Efficiency and Productivity in Defense Spending initiative, Memorandum from The Under Secretary of Defense to the Defense Acquisition Workforce (Nov. 13, 2012), and place a heavy emphasis on avoiding "vendor lock" by employing Open Systems Architecture ("OSA") and intellectual property strategies, as well as taking specific additional steps to ensure competition in developmental programs, weapons systems production, services, and commodities procurements. The DOD's intellectual property guidance has sparked a particular interest within the defense community and includes policies that defense contractors have been seeing come into play in recent years, including added attention to intellectual property license rights and restrictive markings. To remedy the DOD's concerns that it has failed to secure necessary technical data deliverables and associated license rights, the guidelines state that program management must better manage intellectual property issues by: (1) addressing both data deliverables and data rights in the solicitation and resulting contract; (2) pricing contract options for data deliverables and data rights; (3) segregating DOD-funded development from privately-funded technology; (4) requiring form, fit, and function data for proprietary technology or software; (5) evaluating intellectual property deliverables and rights in source selections; and (6) monitoring data deliverables and restrictive markings. As DOD and contractors continue to work through these issues on a caseby- case basis, contractors should anticipate the DOD's concerns while keeping in mind that the guidelines specifically state that "[c]are must be taken to avoid requiring an offeror ... to grant [DOD] additional data rights beyond the standard or default rights that are specified in the DFARS clauses."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More