United States: Did The Supreme Court Make The Right Choice (Of Law)?

Last Updated: November 4 2014
Article by Judith R. Blakeway

Exxon Mobile Corp. v. Drennen, 2014 Tex. LEXIS 760 (Tex. Aug. 29, 2014) is a case which has occasioned much comment and consternation. There, the Supreme Court considered whether a New York choice of law provision in a Texas-based corporation's executive bonus compensation incentive program was enforceable.

Exxon Mobile's incentive compensation program allowed forfeiture of an executive's bonus compensation if he accepted employment with a competitor. When Exxon Mobile canceled an executive's incentive awards after he went to work for a competitor, he sued, seeking a declaration that Exxon Mobile's cancellation of his stock award was an impermissible attempt to enforce an unenforceable noncompete. After the jury found for Exxon Mobile, the executive moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The trial court entered judgment on the verdict for Exxon Mobile.

The court of appeals reversed and ordered the trial court to render judgment for the executive, reasoning that the forfeiture provision was an unreasonable covenant not to compete, unenforceable under Texas law as a matter of public policy. The court of appeals refused to give effect to the New York choice of law provision because the result would be against Texas public policy. Exxon Mobile appealed, arguing that the New York choice of law provision was enforceable.

The Supreme Court began its discussion of the enforceability of the choice of law provision by citing Texas Business & Commerce Code §1.301(a) ("[W]hen a transaction bears a reasonable relation to this state and also to another state or nation the parties may agree that the law either of this state or such other state or nation shall govern their rights and duties.")

The Supreme Court analyzed the transaction in terms of the Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Law §187, which provides that the law chosen by the parties will govern their contractual rights unless:

  • it has no substantial relationship to the parties or the transaction and there is no other reasonable basis for the parties' choice, or
  • the chosen law is contrary to a fundamental policy of a state which has a materially greater interest than the chosen state in determining the particular issue, and which would be the state of applicable law in the absence of an effective choice of law.

Exxon Mobile is headquartered in Texas and the executive worked in Houston where he executed the incentive program agreement. But he spent three years working for Exxon Mobile in its New York City office. Exxon Mobile's outside counsel is a New York law firm, and the subject matter of the transaction––XOM shares––are traded on the New York Stock Exchange.

Exxon Mobile claimed the choice of New York law was reasonable because it assured uniformity, certainty and predictability in the application of its incentive programs. Exxon Mobile explained New York law was chosen to govern its incentive agreements for three reasons:

  • Exxon Mobile provides incentive awards to large numbers of employees in many states and countries, many of whom move throughout their careers, so consistency is required to administer the program;
  • New York has a well–developed and clearly defined body of law regarding employee stock incentive programs;
  • Exxon Mobile stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and New York has a well–developed and predictable body of law regarding securities–related transactions.

The Court found these reasons compelling, acknowledging that the Restatement itself recognizes that the prime objectives of contract law––protecting parties' expectations and enabling parties to predict accurately what their rights and liabilities will be––are best furthered and certainty and predictability of result most likely to occur, when parties to multistate transactions can choose the governing law.

In analyzing the Restatement factors, the Court found:

  • the relationship of the transaction and the parties to Texas was more significant than their relation to New York;
  • Texas has a materially greater interest than New York in determining whether the provisions are enforceable;
  • applying New York law to determine the enforceability of forfeiture clauses in non–contributory profit–sharing plans like Exxon Mobile's incentive programs is not contrary to a fundamental policy of Texas.

The Court found persuasive the argument that there is a distinction between a covenant not to compete and a forfeiture provision in a non–contributory profit–sharing plan because such plans do not restrict an employee's right to future employment; rather, these plans force an employee to choose between (1) competing with a former employer without restraint from the former employer or (2) accepting benefits of the retirement plan to which the employee contributed nothing.

Accordingly, the Court held that Exxon Mobile lawfully terminated the outstanding awards upon the executive's breach of the incentive program.

The Court did not analyze whether the transaction was a "qualified transaction" under Business and Commerce Code Section 271.001, probably because the transaction was entered into before the effective date of the statute. A "qualified transaction" is a transaction under which a party pays or receives consideration with an aggregate value of at least $1 million. Bus. & Comm. Code §271.001. On retirement, Drennen had already received 16,700 shares of XOM stock and had cashed out $4 million in pension funds, $1.8 million in 401(k) funds, and 3 million in stock options. His 57,200 restricted shares were worth considerably more than $1 million so the transaction was within the terms of the statute if it otherwise applied.

Under Chapter 271, the law chosen by the parties would:

  • govern the validity or enforceability of the agreement if the transaction bore a reasonable relation to that jurisdiction "regardless of whether the application of that law was contrary to a fundamental or public policy of this state or any other jurisdiction" §271.005;
  • govern the interpretation or construction of the agreement regardless of whether the transaction bore a reasonable relation to that jurisdiction; §271.006; and
  • if the transaction bore a reasonable relation to a particular jurisdiction at the time the parties entered into the transaction, the transaction would continue to bear a reasonable relation to the jurisdiction, regardless of any subsequent change in facts or circumstances with respect to the transaction, the subject matter of the transaction, or any party to the transaction. §271.004(c)(1).

Had the Court applied Chapter 271, the outcome would have been the same.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Judith R. Blakeway
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions