ARTICLE
23 October 2014

Second Circuit Allows After-Acquired Evidence To Support Termination Decision

PR
Proskauer Rose LLP

Contributor

The world’s leading organizations and global players choose Proskauer to represent them when they need it the most. Our top tier team of star trial attorneys, acclaimed transactional lawyers and exceptionally talented partners and associates have earned a reputation for the relentless pursuit of perfection and a dauntless pursuit of success.
The Second Circuit, in a summary order, affirmed a district court’s admission of evidence at trial of a former employee’s misconduct, discovered after the employee’s termination.
United States Employment and HR

On October 9, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in a summary order, affirmed a district court's admission of evidence at trial of a former employee's misconduct, discovered after the employee's termination, to support the employer's reason for discharging the employee.  Weber v. Fujifilm Medical Systems USA, Inc., et al., Nos. 13-4891-cv(L), 14-206-cv(XAP) (2d. Cir. Oct. 9, 2014).  While courts generally accept such "after-acquired evidence" to determine if a plaintiff is entitled to damages, the Weber court expands the after-acquired evidence doctrine by allowing such evidence to be admitted for the purpose of confirming an employer's legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for discharge.

Plaintiff John Weber was hired in 1986 by Pyne Corporation, a predecessor of Defendant FujiFilm Medical Systems USA, Inc. (FMSU), as the company's Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer.  On December 14, 2009, FMSU terminated Weber's employment with cause, citing mismanagement of certain transactions, including his unauthorized approval of a merger.  Weber filed suit against FMSU and other entities and individuals affiliated with FMSU alleging that his termination was the result of race and national origin-based discrimination.

After terminating Weber, FMSU discovered evidence of further misconduct, including Weber's mismanagement of a financing agreement between FMSU, a bank and a consultant.  At trial, the district court admitted this after-acquired evidence to show that defendant's reason for terminating Weber's employment – his mismanagement of FMSU finances – was true.  On appeal, Plaintiff challenged the admissibility of this evidence and the Second Circuit found that the after-acquired evidence was admissible because "Weber's role in the arrangement confirmed [the employer's] suspicions that he mismanaged FMSU's finances."

While this case, as with all others, turns on the facts presented to the Court, it also potentially signals court approval of after-acquired evidence to bolster an employer's defense to a wrongful discharge claim.

Second Circuit Allows After-Acquired Evidence To Support Termination Decision

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More