European Union: Clearing Derivative Transactions In The EU: What You Need To Know

Last Updated: October 22 2014
Article by Peter Green, Jeremy C. Jennings-Mares and Lewis G. Lee

Key Highlights

  • All counterparties within scope of the European Market Infrastructure Regulation ("EMIR") and subject to the clearing obligation will soon be required to centrally clear their applicable derivatives transactions.
  • Draft regulatory technical standards ("RTS") have now been published, establishing the basis for a clearing obligation to apply with respect to certain over the counter ("OTC") interest rate, credit and foreign exchange derivative transactions.
  • The phase-in dates for the central clearing of transactions will apply equally as between counterparties established in the EU and outside of the EU.
  • Non-EU counterparties trading OTC derivatives with EU counterparties, or with other non-EU counterparties where there is a significant connection to the EU, should be aware of their classification under EMIR and categorisation as presented in the RTS.

Background

EMIR places a number of obligations on counterparties to OTC derivative transactions. These include the central clearing of trades deemed to be subject to a 'clearing obligation', trade reporting and other risk-mitigation requirements for uncleared trades (such as portfolio reconciliation and trade collateralisation). While the requirements apply mostly to institutions established in the EU, a number of EMIR's provisions (including the clearing obligation) also have extraterritorial effect. As a consequence, certain entities established outside of the EU (so-called 'third-country entities'), may have positive obligations under EMIR, dependent upon what their status would be under EMIR if they were hypothetically established in the EU and upon the extent to which they are either (i) trading with EU counterparties, or (ii) entering into derivatives trades which have a "direct, substantial and foreseeable" effect within the EU1.

Although EMIR has been in force for over two years, a number of the obligations have been phased in gradually. The reporting requirement, for example, came into effect on February 12, 2014. The clearing requirement, however, has taken longer to implement and confirmation of its effective date for different asset classes and counterparties has remained dependent upon a number of factors, not least of which includes the requirement for the European Securities and Markets Authority ("ESMA") to determine which derivatives trades should, in accordance with EMIR's criteria, be mandatorily clearable.

On July 11, 2014, ESMA published its initial consultation on the clearing of certain OTC credit derivatives (the "CD Consultation")2. On October 1, 2014, ESMA published its final report covering draft technical standards on the clearing obligation, in respect of Interest Rate OTC Derivatives ("IRS Report")3. Simultaneously, it published a consultation on the clearing obligation to be applied with respect to foreign exchange non-deliverable forwards ("FX NDF Consultation")4. Each of these publications sets out the extent to which particular derivatives trades might be appropriate for central clearing, in accordance with the criteria required to be satisfied under Article 5(4) of EMIR (the "Criteria"). For example, consideration is given to, amongst other things, the degree of standardisation of contractual terms, the volume and liquidity of the market for such transactions and the availability of relevant pricing information. The publications then go on to state when the applicable clearing obligation might apply and with respect to whom.

Interest Rate Derivatives

The IRS Report specifies that the interest rate derivative products available for central clearing fall broadly into four categories:

  • Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate Swaps (plain vanilla IRS);
  • Floating-to-Floating Interest Rate Swaps (known as basis swaps);
  • Forward Rate Agreements (FRA); and
  • Overnight Index Swaps (OIS).

These categories are then further broken down in order to define the applicable class that is subject to the clearing obligation. Characteristics used for this purpose include settlement currency (primarily EUR, GBP, USD and JPY), maturity (e.g., between 28 days and 50 years for a basis swap, or between 3 days and 3 years for an FRA), the existence of any optionality and the notional type (constant or variable).

The draft RTS in the IRS Report set out the complete list of clearable derivative classes in Annex 1 thereto. However, ESMA makes clear that it continues to assess the scope of other interest rate derivatives denominated in non-G4 currencies and that it can "add at any moment classes that were not previously declared to be subject to the clearing obligation".

Credit Derivatives

Unlike the clearing of interest rate and foreign exchange derivatives, the market for credit derivatives is typically more bespoke and less standardised. As a consequence, there are fewer transaction types which satisfy the Criteria and therefore lend themselves to clearing. Nevertheless, given that the credit market represented circa $21 trillion in outstanding notional at the end of 20135, ESMA recognises the significance of the market and the priority need to try and clear such trades where possible. In particular, it proposed in the CD Consultation that the clearing obligation should be applied to trades referencing certain untranched indices, specifically the iTraxx Europe Main Index and the iTraxx Europe Crossover Index. Such trades should reference Series 11 of the relevant index onwards, have a 5 year maturity and settle in EUR. It remains to be seen how (if at all) these conclusions might be amended following publication of ESMA's final report on the clearing of credit derivatives.

Foreign Exchange Derivatives

In the FX NDF Consultation, ESMA makes clear that it considers non-deliverable forward transactions ("NDFs") to be cash-settled foreign exchange forward contracts. Such transactions will typically specify an exchange rate against the currency of delivery (the convertible currency6), a notional amount of the non-convertible currency and a settlement date. Given the cash-settled nature of these transactions, there is no physical delivery of the designated currency at maturity. Instead, at the time of settlement, spot market exchange rates are compared to forward rates and the trades are cash-settled on a net basis, in the convertible currency, based on the notional amount. Such NDFs are commonly referred to in the context of a particular currency-pair, such as Taiwan Dollar (TWD) / U.S. Dollar (USD) or Brazilian Real (BRL) / U.S. Dollar (USD).

Based on its analysis of the market and the required Criteria, ESMA has provisionally concluded that the following NDF currency pairs should be subject to a clearing obligation (assuming cash settlement in USD with a maturity range between 3 days and 2 years):

  • Brazilian Real (BRL) / U.S. Dollar (USD)
  • Chilean Peso (CLP) / U.S. Dollar (USD)
  • Chinese Yuan (CNY) / U.S. Dollar (USD)
  • Colombian Peso (COP) / U.S. Dollar (USD)
  • Indonesian Rupiah (IDR) / U.S. Dollar (USD)
  • Indian Rupee (INR) / U.S. Dollar (USD)
  • Korean Won (KRW) / U.S. Dollar (USD)
  • Malaysian Ringgit (MYR) / U.S. Dollar (USD)
  • Philippine Peso (PHP) / U.S. Dollar (USD)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB) / U.S. Dollar (USD)
  • Taiwan Dollar (TWD) / U.S. Dollar (USD)

Categorisation of Market Participants

Given the details provided with respect to which transactions are likely to become clearable, the next question is when this is likely to happen? Since ESMA recognises that different counterparties are subject to different levels of readiness for central clearing, its preference is to operate a phased-in approach, whereby the largest and most active participants shall be required to centrally clear their derivatives trades first. Accordingly, it has opted to divide market counterparties into four categories as follows:

Category 1 = Clearing Members. ESMA regards that Clearing Members are the group of counterparties that should have to clear first, since they are the most active participants and they already have direct access to the CCPs to clear their derivatives.

Category 2 = Financial Counterparties or Alternative Investment Funds ("AIFs") that are also Non-Financial Counterparties above the clearing threshold ("NFC+")7, which:

  • are not Clearing Members satisfying the Category 1 requirements; and
  • have an aggregate month-end average notional amount of non-centrally cleared derivatives equal to or greater than, €8 billion.

Category 3 = Financial Counterparties or AIF's that are also NFC+ entities, which:

  • are not Clearing Members satisfying the Category 1 requirements; and
  • do not have an aggregate month-end average notional amount of non-centrally cleared derivatives equal to or greater than, €8 billion.

Category 4 = All NFC+ entities which are not covered by Categories 1, 2 or 3.

It should be noted that these categories reflect the position as stated in the IRS Report, following ESMA's analysis of the market's response to its proposals. At present, the CD Consultation makes reference to the application of only three phase-in categories, as per the position in the initial IRS consultation (published in July 2014). We expect, however, that the phase in of credit derivative clearing will follow the approach described above (as is also the case for foreign exchange derivatives).

Considerations for Third-Country Entities

The categorisation of entities established in third-countries is exactly the same as it is for EU counterparties. This is because third-country entities are deemed to belong to the category of counterparty to which they would belong, if they were established in the Union. Essentially, a non-EU entity that is subject to the clearing obligation shall therefore be required to make the following determinations:

  • If the relevant entity were 'hypothetically' established in the EU, would it be either a Financial Counterparty or an NFC+?

A large number of third-country entities, particularly those which trade derivatives with EU counterparties, have already been asked by such EU counterparties to consider their classification under EMIR, for example, in order for the EU counterparty to work out how often portfolios of non-cleared derivatives need to be reconciled. As a consequence, for many entities, this analysis may not be entirely new. However, entities looking at this for the first time will need to consider a variety of factors, including the nature of their business and the volume of derivatives trades that they enter into8.

  • Is the relevant entity a direct Clearing Member of a CCP authorised under EMIR?

To fall into Category 1 for all classes of derivatives subject to the clearing obligation, an entity only needs to be a Clearing Member (of a CCP that is authorised under EMIR to clear such derivatives) for the purpose of clearing one of the classes of derivatives subject to the clearing obligation.

  • If the relevant entity were established in the EU, would it be an Alternative Investment Fund (AIF) that qualifies as an NFC+?

An AIF is essentially a collective investment undertaking, including investment compartments thereof, which raises capital from a number of investors with a view to investing it in accordance with a defined investment policy for the benefit of those investors. Certain AIFs do not qualify as Financial Counterparties but still trade a high enough volume of OTC derivatives to fall above the clearing threshold for a particular asset class. As a consequence, this may push the relevant counterparty into either Category 2 or 3.

Phase-In of Clearing Obligation

Given the classification of an entity in accordance with the categorisation described above, the phase-in dates for when the clearing obligation comes into effect are as follows:

  • Category 1: 6 months after the applicable RTS enters into force;
  • Category 2: 12 months after the applicable RTS enters into force;
  • Category 3: 18 months after the applicable RTS enters into force; and
  • Category 4: 3 years after the IRS RTS enters into force9.

Counterparties in Two Different Categories

Where a contract is entered into between two counterparties included in different categories, then the clearing obligation takes effect on the latest of the two dates. Therefore, in order to know when the clearing obligation will apply in respect of clearable trades entered into between two counterparties, each counterparty must know its own categorisation, as well as the categorisation of its counterparty.

Frontloading

Article 4(1)(b)(ii) of EMIR provides the primary frontloading obligation. This states that after a CCP has been authorised to clear a particular class of derivative, but before the actual clearing obligation applies to that class of derivatives (the "frontloading period"), all derivatives of that class that are entered into or novated during the frontloading period and have a certain minimum remaining maturity, must be cleared.

The main concern with this obligation from an operational perspective has been that market participants have had no certainty regarding whether or not (or when) a particular derivative that they are about to enter into will become clearable. As a consequence, this has led to enormous pricing difficulties (i.e., should it be priced as a cleared trade or not?). Since a cleared OTC trade has a different collateralisation and liability regime to an uncleared OTC trade, it needs to be priced differently.

ESMA was charged with developing regulatory technical standards in relation to the appropriate minimum remaining maturity for contracts to be frontloaded, and in a letter from ESMA to the Commission dated May 8, 2014, ESMA explains that the frontloading period can be subdivided into two categories:

Period A: from the time a CCP is authorised by a competent authority to clear a class of derivatives (and such authorisation is notified to ESMA) and the date of publication in the Official Journal of the RTS relating to clearing that class; and

Period B: from the date of publication in the Official Journal of the RTS relating to clearing that class and the date of application of the clearing obligation.

Period A is deemed to be the time of greater concern to market participants, since at that stage, there is no clarity on whether the class of derivatives will be accepted for clearing. In Period B, however, the RTS has been finalised and counterparties will have a date for when the clearing obligation becomes effective (depending on their categorisation).

For Period A therefore, ESMA has recommended setting the minimum remaining maturity requirement very high, to ensure that effectively no trades entered into or novated during that period will need to be cleared. For Period B, however, ESMA has recommended a reasonably low level which ensures that only those trades close to expiry (e.g., within 6 months) when the RTS are published will not have to be cleared.

Next Steps

The IRS Report has now been submitted to the European Commission. The Commission has three months within which to adopt the draft RTS in the form of a Commission Regulation. Assuming that the RTS are adopted by the end of the three month period, this means that the first phase of Category 1 clearing obligations will become applicable in mid-2015.

The CD Consultation closed for comments on September 18, 2014. We await ESMA's final report in this regard. The FX NDF Consultation remains open for comments until November 6, 2014. Once the consultation process for these asset classes has been completed, the technical standards applicable to credit and foreign exchange derivatives will be published in final form and submitted to the European Commission for endorsement. As above, the European Commission will have three months to make its endorsement.

Footnotes

1. An obligation may also arise where it is necessary or appropriate to prevent the evasion of any of the provisions of EMIR.

2. http://www.esma.europa.eu/system/files/2014-800.pdf.

3. http://www.esma.europa.eu/system/files/esma-2014-1184_final_report_clearing_obligation_irs.pdf.

4. http://www.esma.europa.eu/system/files/esma-2014-1185.pdf. It should be noted that separately, ESMA has also consulted on the clearing obligation as it might be applied to credit derivatives.

5. Bank for International Settlements, statistics at December 2013 - http://www.bis.org/statistics/derdetailed.htm.

6. This is typically USD.

7. The clearing thresholds refer to thresholds above which EMIR requires that a Non-Financial Counterparty shall be subject to the clearing requirement. They are as follows: €1 billion in gross notional value for OTC credit derivative contracts, €1 billion in gross notional value for OTC equity derivatives, €3 billion in gross notional value for OTC interest rate derivatives, €3 billion in gross notional value for OTC foreign exchange derivatives, €3 billion in gross notional value for OTC commodity derivatives and €3 billion in gross notional value for OTC derivative contracts not otherwise specified. Once an entity breaches the clearing threshold for any one class of derivatives, it is required to centrally clear all classes of derivatives subject to the clearing obligation.

8. Morrison & Foerster has acted for a significant number of third-country entities in performing this analysis and would be happy to assist if this were required.

9. The Category 4 phase-in for interest rate swaps is 3 years (or 36 months) from the date the IRS RTS comes into force. Given that the effectiveness of the NDS RTS will follow that date by around three months, there will be a progressive shortening for each future class of derivative to be cleared going forwards, thereby ensuring that the clearing obligation for all classes of derivatives is likely to be fully implemented within 3 years of the IRS RTS coming into force.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Peter Green
Jeremy C. Jennings-Mares
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Shearman & Sterling LLP
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Shearman & Sterling LLP
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions