United States: 8 Tips On U.S.P.T.O. Examiner Interviews

TIP #1 – The Examiner Gets It

Very often office actions give the impression that the examiner just doesn't get it.  A claim with a limitation A is rejected as anticipated by a reference showing B.  Clients sometimes express great displeasure with the examiner.  But the examiner almost always does get it.  The disconnect is a failure to understand two important aspects of the examiner's job.  First, the examiner must give the claim its broadest reasonable interpretation.  A claim to a hammer might be rejected based on a wrench, which is the broadest reasonable interpretation since the wrench has a surface which can bang in a nail.  Second, it is not the examiner's function to explain the basis for his/her rejection (such as the fact that giving the claim its broadest reasonable interpretation the hammer reads on a wrench).  Engage the examiner, preferably by a phone call or personal interview to determine what he/she is thinking.  This is usually the start of a meaningful dialogue.

TIP #2 – Breaking Through
Given a stalemate, as described in Tip #1 above, the last thing that one should do is just argue that a hammer is not the same as a wrench.  Intuition alone would suggest that the examiner knows that much.  At this point, I would suggest turning the interview around and asking the examiner to explain the rejection because I simply do not understand it. This will invariably bring to light the examiner's reasons (broadest possible interpretation, etc.) which then provides a launching pad for a meaningful dialogue and a successful result.  I would ask the examiner his/her views on what limitations would render the wrench inapplicable as a reference.  I might explain how a hammer does things that a wrench cannot do, possibly suggesting further limitations.  It is surprising how many of the amendments which are brought up in the course of an interview are not unduly limiting.  

TIP #3 – Get to Know the Examiner
Get to know the examiner in advance of the interview.  It is important to know whether the examiner tends to be reasonable or unreasonable.  Of course the attorney may have met the examiner before, but if not, do not judge the examiner by his/her written office action.  Some examiners who seem unreasonable on paper are more reasonable in person, and it makes a big difference to know that.  The telephone call setting up the interview should be more than perfunctory.  Ask questions.  Carry on a brief conversation. Can the interview be conducted in person or by telephone? Does the examiner telecommute, if so from where?  An ancillary benefit is that the examiner will get to know the attorney, which could place the examiner at ease going into the interview.  Also, of course, see if any of your colleagues have had an interview with this examiner.

TIP #4 – Best Time (And Whether) to Conduct an Interview
Conventional wisdom dictates that interviews be conducted before a final rejection so that there will be an opportunity to freely amend the claims without having to file an RCE. However, at least for economic reasons, this is not usually done.  So how does one decide?  If the attorney is taking allowed claims or observes clear factual errors in the examiner's interpretation of the references, which cannot be explained by "broadest reasonable interpretation", a written response might be adequate.  But even here, it is suggested that the attorney make a quick call to the examiner to ask him/her to explain the reasoning with respect to that particular perceived factual error.  Either the examiner will agree that there is error, or the attorney will be in a better position to argue the point in the written response.  As the issues become more complex and/or there are many claims in issue, a judgment must be made as to whether or not an interview would be productive (given the time restriction discussed in TIP #5 below).

TIP #5 – Conducting the Interview
The attorney needs to be sharply focused since an interview is limited to only a half hour.  Generally I would discuss only a single broad independent claim.  If there are separate, different, important independent claims, I would save time by just pointing out their differences and/or defer comments until the written response.

The interview will normally have three phases.

Phase One – explain the invention.  If the examiner has not understood the invention, or glossed over key limitations, this is the attorney's opportunity to explain the invention to the examiner in the attorney's own words, complete with the advantageous results, etc.  If the examiner now really understands the invention for the first time, this will be an important break-through. 

Phase Two – Discuss the main claim, as is or as proposed to be amended.  I would then generally sit back and give the examiner all the time needed to review the claim.  Hopefully, and as is usually the case, the examiner now becomes engaged and will start commenting on the claim.  Any comments are good, whether favorable or unfavorable, because they give the attorney an indication of what the examiner is looking for to overcome the references.

Phase Three – Discussion of the prior art.  I would limit this discussion to the elements of the primary references which are missing from the claim, plus only key portions of the secondary references.

Usually at this point the attorney is into a dialogue with a fully engaged examiner.  It is then up to the attorney, having fully prepared for the interview, to know which limitations proposed by the examiner are acceptable to the client and which limitations the attorney would propose, which have been accepted in advance by the client. 

TIP #6 – In Person vs. Telephone or Video Interview
All things being equal, an in person interview is preferable. However, this is not always economical.  Also, since many examiners telecommute from home, personal interviews with them are not possible.  Steps can be taken to maximize the effectiveness of a telephone interview.  First, referring to Tip #3 above, get to know the examiner.  Where is the examiner telecommuting from?  Second, concerted efforts should be made to supply the examiner in advance with whatever documents will be helpful in the course of the interview, such as amended claims, dictionary definitions, marked up copies of the prior art, sketches of the invention, etc.  Give some thought as to when to supply such materials, for example far in advance of the interview, or just before the interview.

Video interviews, in theory, would be preferable over telephone interviews.  However, from my own experiences as well as tales heard from other attorneys and even from examiners, it is technologically difficult to set up and smoothly run a video interview.  Until the procedure is perfected, I would caution against a video interview. 

TIP #7 – Inclusion of Inventor or Client Patent Attorney
Examiners do seem to be favorably impressed by the presence of a third party, as that suggests the importance of the invention to the applicant.  Also, of course, such third parties can bring valuable knowledge to the interview.  Such attendance can be in person or by telephone, depending on what is possible and deemed appropriate.  Inventors themselves often have the most knowledge about their inventions, and theoretically an inventor might be the best person to attend the interview.  However, apart from economic reasons, there is the problem that inventors, not being legally trained, might say something that could be counter-productive, for example that element X is important, when in fact element X is not disclosed and/or is unduly limiting.  So if it does become necessary to include an inventor in an interview, it is vital that that the inventor be prepared in advance, not unlike preparation of a witness before a deposition.  Another possibility is for the attorney's client who is also an attorney (U.S. in-house counsel or foreign patent attorney) to attend.

TIP #8 – What is a Successful Conclusion?
The attorney will virtually never be told at the end of the interview that the examiner would allow the application, since the examiner must always conduct a further search. Hence the best result is that the claims are allowable over the cited prior art.  However, I consider the interview successful if the examiner states that in his/her opinion, the main claim, as is or with limitations discussed at the interview will overcome the cited prior art and/or why the references do not show claimed invention.  In this case, however, to achieve allowance, the ball is back in the attorney's court to focus on and discuss those limitations in the response and explain why (as discussed at the interview) they do in fact distinguish over the prior art.  Also, it is helpful to keep the dialogue alive by, for example, requesting in the response that the examiner contact the attorney by telephone if it would help to advance the prosecution of the application.

Even if the results of the interview are not favorable, clarification of the examiner's position can be highly beneficial in helping the attorney decide what further course of action to recommend (e.g. appeal, RCE, continuation or abandon) and  what further amendments and/or arguments to present.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions