United States: False Advertising: No FDA Preemption In Pom v. Coca-Cola

Pom Wonderful LLC v. The Coca-Cola Company, 573 U.S. ___ (2014), 134 S. Ct. 2228

This case involves the labeling of a blended juice beverage named "Pomegranate Blueberry," sold under Coca-Cola's MINUTE MAID brand, depicted below.

This beverage contains 99.4% apple and grape juices. The plaintiff, Pom Wonderful LLC ("Pom Wonderful"), produces a competing product containing only pomegranate juice and blueberry juice. Pom Wonderful sued Coca-Cola under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, alleging that the prominent use of "pomegranate blueberry" on the label of Coca-Cola's beverage was deceptive. It was apparently uncontested that the MINUTE MAID brand beverage labeling was in compliance with Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") regulations on juice beverage labeling, which state that the manufacturer may name a beverage using the name of a flavoring juice that is not the predominant juice by volume in the beverage. (21 C.F.R. Section 102.33(c), issued by the FDA under authority granted by the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act ("FDCA"), to regulate food and beverage labeling, including to police labeling which is false or misleading, 21 U.S.C. Section 343(a)(1)). The contested label also disclosed the percentages of the actual juices in the beverage, but in smaller type.

The United States District Court for the Central District of California granted summary judgment for Coca-Cola, holding that the Lanham Act claim on the label was barred as a matter of law because it would conflict with FDA regulations, even though Pom Wonderful introduced a survey purportedly showing that 35% of consumers polled thought that the beverage contained mainly pomegranate and blueberry juices. Pom Wonderful LLC v. The Coca-Cola Company, 727 F. Supp. 2d 849 (C.D. Cal. 2010). On appeal by Pom Wonderful, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed and held that the intent of Congress was to comprehensively regulate the field of beverage labeling by giving the FDA sole authority. Accordingly, the plaintiff could not seek to impose more stringent standards of labeling via a claim under the Lanham Act. Pom Wonderful LLC v. The Coca-Cola Company, 679 F.3d 1170 (9th Cir. 2012). The question before the United States Supreme Court, on further appeal, was whether a private party can bring a Lanham Act deceptive labeling claim challenging a product label already regulated, as to possible deceptiveness, under the FDCA. The Court concluded that a private party could bring such a claim and remanded the case for trial.

In Justice Kennedy's opinion, dated June 12, 2014, in which all the members joined (except Justice Breyer, who did not participate), the Supreme Court reversed the Ninth Circuit and remanded the case for trial. The Court held that the FDA regulations did not comprehensively regulate fruit beverage labeling and that the plaintiff could sue Coca-Cola for false designation of origin under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a).

The opinion stated several reasons for the decision including that (1) during almost 70 years of coexistence of the FDCA and the Lanham Act, Congress never amended either statute to clarify that Lanham Act Section 43(a) did not cover deceptive beverage labeling, (2) the focus of the FDCA is public health and safety, while the Lanham Act protects businesses and, indirectly, the public, against deceptive practices by their competitors, (3) the FDA did not specifically review or approve the label in question (unlike the FDA's specific review and approval of drug labels), and (4) the two federal statutes "complement each other with respect to remedies" because a competitor, who sues under the Lanham Act, may have a better "perspective or expertise" than the FDA "in assessing market dynamics" and "have detailed knowledge regarding how consumers rely upon certain sales and marketing strategies" (slip opinion at p. 11). Thus, the competitor plaintiff may have an awareness "far more immediate and accurate than that of agency rulemakers and regulators" that "Lanham Act suits draw upon . . .by empowering private parties to sue competitors to protect their interests on a case-by-case basis." This approach "takes advantage of synergies among multiple methods of regulation." To hold otherwise could leave competitors and consumers "with less effective protection in the food and beverage labeling realm than in many other, less regulated industries," contrary to the likely intent of Congress (slip opinion at p. 12).

The Supreme Court's opinion did not cite any Lanham Act deceptive advertising or labeling cases as examples, but there are such cases in which plaintiffs alleged that literally accurate statements in a label or an advertisement were, nonetheless, deceptive to substantial percentages of consumers (often by doing a survey to gauge consumer reactions). See Illinois Bell Telephone Company v. MCI Telecommunications Corporation, 1996 WL 717466 (N.D. Ill., 1996) (granting a preliminary injunction based on survey evidence showing that the statement "MCI's basic toll rates are ALWAYS lower" than the plaintiff's rates is misleading, even if literally true);and Playskool, Inc. v. Product Dev. Group, Inc., 699 F. Supp. 1056 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) (statement that defendant's toy construction system "attaches to" plaintiff's toy construction system was literally true, but falsely implied that all of defendant's pieces can safely connect with the plaintiff's toys). Cf. Coors Brewing Co. v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc., 802 F. Supp. 965 (S.D.N.Y. 1992) (in which Fross Zelnick successfully used a survey to defend a false advertising claim involving literally accurate statements that were allegedly deceptive). The Supreme Court's recitation of the facts of the Pom Wonderful case, including a reference to the "miniscule amount of pomegranate and blueberry juices in the blend of the Coca-Cola juice drink," suggests that many of the Justices thought that the FDA has actually failed to protect consumers from deception. The juice drink at issue was an inexpensive supermarket shelf product. Many courts have held that consumers select such products from store shelves without great care or attention.

As to the broader effects of the Supreme Court's decision, many federal statutes give federal agencies the right to promulgate regulations on the information to be disclosed in product labels, data sheets, and the like, in particular industries, and use language similar to the language regarding false and misleading labeling of the FDCA. The opinion's broad endorsement of the superiority of Lanham Act litigation by competitors, in civil suits, to prevent deception, as compared to federal agency regulation, may make it difficult for parties in other industries to dismiss such suits on grounds that Congress intended such federal regulations completely to occupy the field in their industry. However, the opinion was also careful to comment that the FDA did not examine or approve the individual beverage label concerned in this case, contrary to the FDA's usual review of drug labeling. The implication is that there may be federal agency labeling regimes that do fully occupy the field, based, for example, on different legislative history, or because the agency has greater expert knowledge on the reaction of pertinent consumers or does an expert review of each individual label concerned. This was also not a case of a label directed to sophisticated commercial or industrial consumers, or a case involving a hazardous material, in which the Supreme Court might be moved by different policy considerations or facts about the comprehensiveness of the federal regulatory scheme. Therefore, this case does not necessarily close the door to a comprehensive federal regulation defense, regarding a different type of product, in future Lanham Act deceptive labeling suits.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions