United States: The Sherlock Holmes Copyright Case

Klinger v. Conan Doyle Estate, Ltd., 755 F.3d 496 (7th Cir. 2014)

The Seventh Circuit recently issued its decision in Klinger v. Conan Doyle Estate, Ltd., holding that the copyright protection of a fictional character cannot be extended beyond the expiration of the copyright for a work in which the character first appeared just because the author altered the character in a subsequent work that still enjoyed copyright protection.

The case concerned the Sherlock Holmes stories authored by Arthur Conan Doyle. Doyle published fifty-six Sherlock Holmes stories and four Sherlock Holmes novels between 1887 and 1927. 755 F.3d at 497. Except for ten stories published between 1923 and 1927, all of the stories and novels are now in the public domain. Id. Thus, they can be copied and sold without a license from Doyle's estate. Several years ago, plaintiff-appellee Leslie Klinger, believing that he did not need a license, co-edited an anthology that contained works by various modern authors inspired by the Sherlock Holmes stories. Id. Most of these stories featured the characters Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson. Id. The Doyle estate was not pleased with Klinger's anthology and demanded a $5,000 copyright license from Random House, the publisher of the book. Id. Random House agreed to pay and thereafter published Klinger's book. Id.

A few years later, Klinger decided to create a sequel to the anthology. He entered into negotiations with Pegasus Books to publish the sequel. Id. Before the sequel was completed, the Doyle estate learned of the project and demanded a licensing fee from Pegasus Books for the book to be legally published. Id. at 497-98. The Doyle estate advised Pegasus Books that, without a license, the estate would prevent distribution of Klinger's book, implicitly threatening to sue Pegasus for copyright infringement. Id. at 498. Pegasus Books was scared off from the project and told Klinger that he had to obtain a license from the estate before Pegasus Books would publish the sequel. Id.

Rather than pay for the license, Klinger sought a declaratory judgment in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois that he was free to use the material in the Sherlock Holmes stories that already were in the public domain. Id. The district court granted Klinger's motion for summary judgment, and the estate appealed on two grounds: 1) the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, and 2) even if there was jurisdiction, the district court erred because the copyrights on the "complex" characters in the Sherlock Holmes stories, "whose complexity [was] not revealed until a later story," remained intact until the later stories entered the public domain. Id. The Seventh Circuit affirmed the district court in a decision written by Judge Richard Posner and joined by Judges Joel Flaum and Daniel Manion.

The jurisdictional question was whether there existed a case or controversy under 28 U.S.C. § 2201(a). Id. at 499. The Seventh Circuit concluded that such a controversy existed because the Doyle estate had made clear that if Klinger's book were published, it would prevent distribution of the book and potentially sue for copyright infringement, "twin threats" that "created an actual rather than potential controversy." Id.

In support of its jurisdiction argument, the estate had asserted that the case could not be heard until Klinger's book was finished because otherwise it was impossible to decide whether the book infringed the estate's copyrights. Id. at 499-500. The court rejected this argument because the issue presented on appeal did not depend on the contents of the book. Id. at 500.Klinger had averred that his book would contain no copyrightable material that appeared only in the last ten books. Id. Thus, the question was purely one of law, namely, whether Klinger was free to copy the Sherlock Holmes characters as they were depicted in the earlier, public-domain stories. Id.

Turning to the merits, the court stated that when a story falls into the public domain, the elements of the story, such as the characters, follow, and there was no basis in statute or law "for extending a copyright beyond its expiration." Id. While it was true that the last ten stories still enjoyed copyright protection, those ten stories were derivative works and thus only the original elements added in those stories remained protected. Id. at 501. Those additions or alterations could not revive the expired copyrights in the original characters. Id. at 503.

The court addressed and rejected the estate's various arguments. First, the estate asserted that creativity would be discouraged if the court did not rule in its favor. Id. at 501. The estate maintained that it takes a long time to perfect a character and an author's incentive to improve the character in the future may be diminished if he loses the copyright and is forced to compete with copiers. Id. Judge Posner ruled that this argument had no relevance here because Arthur Conan Doyle died 84 years ago, so he would not be competing against the authors who were to contribute to Klinger's anthology. Id. Moreover, the estate's position might not even induce creativity. For example, it would reduce the incentive of subsequent authors to create derivative works, or it would encourage authors to write stories using their old characters in an effort to extend their existing copyrights. Id. Thus, this argument was rejected.

The estate also tried to distinguish between "flat" and "round" characters. Id. Round characters, according to the estate, evolve, and thus the characters of Holmes and Watson were not "fully rounded off" until the last story in 1927. Id. at 502. The court bluntly responded that it failed to see how this distinction could "justify extending the expired copyright on the flatter characters," especially since the last ten stories all were supposed to take place before 1914, the last year in which the other stories were set. Id.

The court was sympathetic to the estate's potential concern that a modern author might write a story disparaging the characters in the Sherlock Holmes stories, which could deter someone from reading Doyle's stories. Id. at 503. Judge Posner compared such a scenario to trademark dilution, but explained that no such comparable concept existed in copyright law. Id. In any event, the estate did not seem worried about potential disparagement and was more concerned with not receiving a licensing fee. Id.

The court concluded by noting that the estate's appeal was seeking copyright protection in the characters for a term of up to 135 years, a position "that bordered on the quixotic" and one that would be at odds with the "limited times" requirement in the Constitution's copyright clause. Id. The Doyle estate has indicated that it will appeal the Seventh Circuit's decision to the United States Supreme Court. Even if the Supreme Court grants certiorari, the estate faces an uphill battle in convincing the Supreme Court that the characters of the Sherlock Holmes stories should remain protected under copyright law.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions