United States: Court Finds That A Nail In The Head Is An ADA Disability

Last Updated: October 8 2014
Article by Michael Stevens and Karen S. Vladeck

In order to state a claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), a plaintiff must prove that (1) he was disabled within the meaning of the ADA; (2) he was qualified to perform the essential functions of the job, with or without a reasonable accommodation; and (3) his employer took an adverse employment action against him because of his disability or without making a reasonable accommodation for it.

The US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois recently confronted the issue of whether an employee who had a four-inch nail lodged in his skull due to a non-work related incident was either (1) disabled; or (2) able to perform the essential functions of the job with or without reasonable accommodation. The Court concluded that the plaintiff, Gino Stragapede (Stragapede), was entitled to summary judgment as to whether he was "disabled" under the ADA, and that whether he could perform the essential functions of his job could only be resolved at trial. See Stragapede v. City of Evanston, No. 1:12-cv-08879 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 26, 2014), available here.

Stragapede began working for the City of Evanston (the City) as a water service worker in 1996. In 2009, he had a four-inch nail lodged in his head after an accident with a nail gun in his garage. When Stragapede asked to return to work in early 2010, the City requested that he first obtain a fitness-for-duty evaluation from a doctor. The first doctor to examine Stragapede was unable to clear him for duty, and she recommended that he receive an independent neurological assessment. A neurologist then examined Stragapede and concluded that, although Stragapede suffered from "mild residual cognitive deficits," he "should be able to return to work." Stragapede's doctor recommended a work "trial" supervised by a coworker to ensure that he could properly perform his job functions. The City subjected Stragapede to a written test, tool recognition exam, and a fieldwork trial. In June 2010, Stragapede completed the work trial, accompanied by his supervisors and other City employees. Stragapede  also passed the other tests, so the City cleared him to return to work.

Less than a month after he returned to work, the City placed Stragapede on administrative leave pending an assessment of his ability to perform his essential job functions. During Stragapede's administrative leave, the City communicated with his doctor about Stragapede's performance issues. Eventually, the City asked Stragapede to submit to another examination by his doctor. The doctor reported that Stragapede's performance problems were consistent with cognitive dysfunction from Stragapede's brain injury. The doctor also said that "the simplest accommodation would involve having a co-worker go out on work assignments with Mr. Stragapede." Based in part on its discussions with the doctor, the City fired Stragapede on September 24, 2010. In December 2010, Stragapede filed a charge of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), alleging that the City discriminated against him in violation of the ADA. After the EEOC issued its Notice of Right to Sue, Stragapede sued the City in federal court.

In the City's motion for summary judgment, it argued that Stragapede was not disabled under the ADA and that the City did not consider him to be disabled. Stragapede argued in his own motion for summary judgment that the cognitive impairment he suffered — which affected his memory, attention, and executive function — clearly fit under the ADA's definition of disability. Even if it did not fit the ADA's definition, the City "regarded him" as being disabled.

The Court denied both parties' motions as to whether Stragapede was actually disabled under the ADA. The Court looked to whether Stragapede's major life activities — such as caring for himself, performing manual tasks, seeing, hearing, eating, sleeping, walking, standing, lifting, bending, speaking, breathing, learning, reading, concentrating, thinking, communicating, and working — had been substantially impaired. Based on the evidence that the City had provided, and the lack of evidence that Stragapede submitted, the Court denied both parties' motions, finding that a reasonable jury could conclude that Stragapede's major life activities had been limited.

The Court agreed with Stragapede, however, that the City had regarded him as being disabled. Under the ADA, a person is regarded as disabled by his employer if he "has been subjected to an action prohibited under this chapter because of actual or perceived physical or mental impairment whether or not the impairment limits or is perceived to limit a major life activity." As discovery had demonstrated, the City had acknowledged Stragapede was "disabled" in draft versions of his termination letter and in correspondence with Stragapede's doctor. Some draft termination letters circulated among City employees stated that Stragapede's firing was "not due to discipline, but to [his] disability." The final termination letter also advised Stragapede to seek disability benefits. Whereas the letters between the City and Stragapede's doctor did not use the word "disability," they did discuss Stragapede's injury, and included terms like "essential functions" and "accommodation" which, the Court concluded, are suggestive of the ADA framework. Thus, the Court found that the undisputed facts established that Stragapede was disabled under the "regarded as" prong of the ADA — thereby granting his motion for summary judgment in part.

The Court found that neither party had met their burden on the issue of whether Stragapede could nevertheless perform the essential functions of his job — and therefore denied summary judgment to the City and Stragapede on this point.

Separate from its unfortunate facts, the Stragapede case raises interesting issues regarding discovery of employer communications leading up to an employee's termination. One major point that the Court relied upon in granting Stragapede's motion was that earlier drafts of his termination notice referenced his "disability," even though the ultimate version did not. This conclusion highlights the importance employers should place on keeping all drafts and communications prior to the final notice privileged as attorney-client communications if possible, and on taking care even in the drafting of preliminary drafts of communications to avoid unintentionally taking positions that may ultimately be used against them.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions