ARTICLE
7 October 2014

Am I The Creditor’s Authorized Agent? (Or: The Article That Ensured I Will Never Sign A Proof Of Claim)

SH
Stites & Harbison PLLC

Contributor

A full-service law firm representing clients across the United States and internationally, Stites & Harbison, PLLC is known as a preeminent firm managing sophisticated transactions, challenging litigation and complex regulatory matters on a daily basis.  The firm represents a broad spectrum of clients including multinational corporations, financial institutions, pharmaceutical companies, health care organizations, private companies, nonprofit organizations, and individuals. Stites & Harbison has 10 offices across five states.
Jonathan Young and Dana Hefter wrote a great article in the August 2014 ABI Journal examining In re Rodriguez, Adv. No. 11-07012 (S.D. Tex. June 5, 2013).
United States Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

Jonathan Young and Dana Hefter wrote a great article in the August 2014 ABI Journal examining In re Rodriguez, Adv. No. 11-07012 (S.D. Tex. June 5, 2013), in which Judge Isgur held that an attorney signing a proof of claim on behalf of a creditor became a fact witness, and consequently waived attorney-client privilege and work product immunity through offensive use.  Their article is a must-read for all bankruptcy attorneys, and any non-bankruptcy attorneys who find themselves confronting Official Form B10 on behalf of clients.

I do not have much of substance to add to Jonathan and Dana's article, other to thank them for being thorough and for having excellent timing.  I read the article less than a week before I was getting ready to prepare a stack of proofs of claim.  I'm sure I've signed claims for clients before out of convenience, but thanks to this decision, I will never do so again.  I don't want to end up on the business end of a deposition table.

You can check out the article at ABI here – The Involuntary Witness:  Privilege and Waiver Issues Raised by Rodriguez (paywall warning, but you should join the ABI anyway).  A copy of the decision is available here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More