ARTICLE
1 October 2014

A Look At Constitutional Challenges To Redskins Decision

W
WilmerHale

Contributor

WilmerHale provides legal representation across a comprehensive range of practice areas critical to the success of its clients. With a staunch commitment to public service, the firm is a leader in pro bono representation. WilmerHale is 1,000 lawyers strong with 12 offices in the United States, Europe and Asia.
After decades of relative obscurity, Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act — which prohibits federal registration of scandalous and disparaging trademarks — was brought to the forefront in the Redskins trademark dispute.
United States Intellectual Property

After decades of relative obscurity, Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act — which prohibits federal registration of scandalous and disparaging trademarks — was brought to the forefront in the Redskins trademark dispute, a lengthy saga that involves more than 20 years of litigation and highly emotionally and politically charged public debate. The dispute culminated when the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office canceled federal registration for several "Redskins" trademarks as disparaging to Native Americans in Blackhorse v. Pro-Football Inc.

Please click here to read the original text of this article in full.

Originally published by Law360.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More