United States: TSCA On Hydraulic Fracturing: Gateway To New Federal Rules?

Last Updated: September 30 2014
Article by Michael L. Krancer, Margaret A. Hill and Frank L. Tamulonis III

Action Items: To avoid and discourage duplicative and unnecessary federal oil and gas regulations, oil and gas operators should resist federal efforts to federalize hydraulic fracturing regulations and should actively engage with state regulators to craft innovative and practical regulations at the state level.

Historically, states have taken the lead in regulating oil and gas development given the states' primary interest in securing rational oil and gas development in their own boundaries. Hydraulic fracturing—a 60-year-old technology used for oil and gas development—is a temporary process of pumping fluids underground for the purpose of extraction of natural gas or oil from deep formations lying 5,000 to 8,000 feet or more below the surface. Fresh groundwater is located from about less than 600 feet below the surface. Hydraulic fracturing has been practiced routinely for decades by operators in many states, including New York.

Hydraulic fracturing has, by design, never been regulated by the federal government. It has always been a matter of state regulation. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has never intended or thought that hydraulic fracturing is or should be subject to any federal regulatory program, including the Safe Drinking Water Act's Underground Injection Control (UIC) program. Instead, the EPA shared the view that the practice was well-regulated by the various states in which it was taking place.

The federal imprimatur on state regulation of hydraulic fracturing was reaffirmed by Congress as recently as 2005 with the enactment of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, and by the EPA in a 2004 study that concluded that hydraulic fracturing poses little or no threat to drinking water, and that no further study is necessary. Importantly, the 2004 EPA study was reaffirmed by a new study just released from the much more agile—and more scientifically competent with respect to hydraulic fracturing—Department of Energy (DOE). This study shows no impact whatsoever between hydraulic fracturing and threats to drinking water supplies. The study, released Monday, was performed by the DOE's National Energy Technology Laboratory. It monitored a hydraulic fracturing operation in Greene County, Pa., for upward fracture growth out of the target zone and upward gas and fluid migration. Results showed that "fracture growth ceased more than 5,000 feet below drinking water aquifers and there was no detectable upward migration of gas or fluids from the hydraulically fractured Marcellus Shale."

Both the 2004 and 2014 studies focus on hydrology and geology in reaching their conclusions, and therefore support the practice to allow states to take the lead in regulating oil and gas production. The current practice is just common sense given the diverse geological and hydrogeological conditions present in states where hydraulic fracturing is done. It would be impractical and ineffective to craft a one-size-fits-all federal rule on hydraulic fracturing that could be implemented in states as geologically diverse as Texas, Wyoming, California and Pennsylvania.

Notwithstanding this common-sense notion that states should regulate hydraulic fracturing in their own backyards— a policy currently shared by presidents, the EPA and Congress—it appears that the EPA may be making a backdoor power grab to end the era of state primacy on this issue. Chief among the EPA's strategic arsenal is the use of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to regulate hydraulic fracturing by regulating oil and gas chemicals used in energy development. The agency's strategy is indeed ironic given the fact that the states involved in hydraulic fracturing have extensive chemical substance disclosure requirements in place already.

The consideration of TSCA's disclosure requirements began in all too typical "friendly lawsuit or petition" fashion in 2011 when Earthjustice, and more than 100 other environmental groups, submitted a TSCA Section 21 petition requesting that the EPA initiate rulemakings for hydraulic fracturing chemicals under Sections 4 and 8 of the TSCA. Specifically, the petition requested that the EPA adopt a rule pursuant to TSCA Section 4 that would require chemical manufacturers and processors to conduct toxicity tests of chemical substances and mixtures used in oil and gas production. Additionally, the petition requested that the EPA adopt a rule pursuant to TSCA Section 8 that would require chemical manufacturers and processors to report information on all chemical substances used in oil and gas exploration. The EPA ultimately denied the requested Section 4 action, but shortly thereafter, the EPA partially granted the petitioners' requests under Section 8, stating, "We believe there is value in initiating a proposed rulemaking process using TSCA authorities to obtain data on chemical substances and mixtures used in hydraulic fracturing." The EPA filed a notice of its intent to publish an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM), requesting comment on what information should be required to be reported or disclosed regarding hydraulic fracturing chemical substances and mixtures. That public comment period closed Thursday.

The TSCA is a "gateway" statute in that it allows the EPA to collect information that may be used to justify additional federal regulation in other programs. In that sense, the ANPRM, by itself, will not directly result in additional federal regulation. Nevertheless, the petition, and the EPA's response, represents a critical first step—it represents a call for new and comprehensive regulation over the oil and gas industry.

It is difficult to predict precisely how the ANPRM will affect federal regulation of hydraulic fracturing. There are several other federal actions under way that could be directly impacted by the information and data garnered during the stakeholder process initiated by the ANPRM. For instance, the Department of the Interior's Bureau of Land Management (BLM) issued draft rules in May 2013 for hydraulic fracturing on federally owned lands. The ANPRM specifically mentions the BLM rules, which would require public disclosure of chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing operations on BLM-managed lands. It is unclear whether the BLM rules and TSCA rules will be similar in scope, but it is possible that oil and gas operators will face disclosure requirements under both.

Another program potentially affected by the ANPRM stakeholder process is the EPA's glacial ongoing study of what effects, if any, hydraulic fracturing may have on drinking water resources. That study, which began in 2010 and is expected to conclude in 2016, aims to understand the relationship between hydraulic fracturing and drinking water resources, and identify factors that may lead to human exposure and risks. Any information collected during this study could influence any TSCA-related rulemaking. Conversely, any information gathered during the rulemaking process could inform the drinking water study.

The ANPRM stakeholder process could also impact the exemption for wastes generated by oil and gas exploration and production (E&P wastes) activities under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Since 1988, certain E&P wastes have been exempt from RCRA Subtitle C hazardous waste management requirements. This exemption is justified on the basis that E&P wastes are large-volume wastes that are lower in toxicity than other wastes regulated under the RCRA hazardous waste program. Moreover, E&P wastes are generally subject to non-hazardous waste regulation under RCRA Subtitle D and applicable state regulations. Indeed, many states have specific regulations and guidance for E&P wastes. That said, the increase in hydraulic fracturing activities and shifting political winds have led to calls for additional E&P waste regulation under the RCRA umbrella. Any potential TSCA rulemaking could provide additional ammunition to environmental groups seeking to roll back the RCRA E&P exemption.

Another point of "mission creep" into the state's regulatory primacy is ASTM International's development of two standards related to hydraulic fracturing. ASTM Subcommittee D18.26 was established to pursue standards pertaining to all aspects of hydraulic fracturing. Additionally, ASTM Subcommittee D.19.09 will address hydraulic fracturing issues, including standards used for assessing water quality and determining the impact of spills and possible contamination. Although not yet finalized, the availability of ASTM standards could facilitate federal regulation of hydraulic fracturing by allowing Congress or federal agencies to incorporate those standards by reference into statutes or regulations.

All the while, states have continued to work hard to develop comprehensive regulatory schemes to permit and regulate oil and gas development including hydraulic fracturing activities. Numerous states have passed increasingly stringent disclosure laws and other regulations tailored to those states' hydraulic fracturing operations. For example, in March, Wyoming enacted one of the nation's most stringent regulations related to well water testing near drilling sites. Colorado also introduced the country's first standards for methane emissions from oil and gas operations. And, in Pennsylvania, we adopted Act 13, which contains one of the most forward-thinking and expansive disclosure laws in the nation. Our law provides for disclosure through a publicly accessible Web-based database known as FracFocus. org, and for mandatory disclosure—even of proprietary information—to health care professionals for the purpose of diagnosis or treatment and immediately in an emergency. Indeed, the Commonwealth Court held in July in Robinson Township v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, No. 284 M.D. 2012, that Act 13's medical disclosure provisions were appropriate and protective.

As a result of these state initiatives, energy companies are subject to an increasingly complex and stringent array of state regulations. The presence and success of these state-led efforts calls into question the necessity and potential effectiveness of greater federal intervention.

It is clear that the EPA is cognizant of the efforts undertaken by states to regulate hydraulic fracturing and, despite the increasing momentum favoring federal regulation, the EPA repeatedly stated in the ANPRM its interest in avoiding duplication and overlap with other regulatory disclosure programs. In so doing, the EPA has recognized that TSCA Section 9 requires that the EPA consult and coordinate with other executive departments and agencies to impose the least burden of duplicative requirements. Section 9 does not, however, prohibit the EPA from imposing disclosure requirements that are more restrictive than other state requirements. And yet, many states have engaged industry and other stakeholders to develop innovative approaches requiring best practices from industry. The EPA may be willing to continue to take a back seat where it is determined that state disclosure requirements and other hydraulic fracturing regulations are sufficiently comprehensive. Accordingly, oil and gas operators may find it advisable to actively engage with state regulators to craft innovative and practical regulations at the state level, so as to possibly avoid or discourage a duplicative one-size-fits-all federal solution.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Michael L. Krancer
Margaret A. Hill
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Emails

From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.