United States: You Infringe, So Now What? $368 Million Jury Damages Patent Award Nixed For Failure To Apportion

Last Updated: September 29 2014
Article by Imran Khaliq and Sean D. Whaley

On September 16, 2014, in VirnetX, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2014), the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals partially upheld the district court's ruling of patent infringement for VirnetX against Apple and Cisco based on Apple's FaceTime and VPN On Demand products. However, the Court determined that the jury award of $368 million was excessive and based on flawed damages calculations presented by VirnetX's damages expert during trial because the calculations relied on the entire value of Apple's products. The Court remanded the case back to the district court to recalculate damages based on an approximate value apportioned to the infringing components of the products sold by the defendants.

The decision is notable because it clarifies the proper method to calculate a reasonable royalty in determinations of patent infringement for multi-component devices involving hardware and software. Royalty calculations that are based on the entire market value (or sales price) of the accused product — rather than the value of the allegedly-infringing technology — are routinely being rejected by the courts. This is especially true for mechanical and electronic devices, where allegedly-infringing products usually include a large number of interconnected components.

In VirnetX, the Federal Circuit grounded its decision on Section 284 of the Patent Act, which provides:

Upon finding for the claimant the court shall award the claimant damages adequate to compensate for the infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by the infringer, together with interest and costs as fixed by the court. ...

35 U.S.C. § 284.

When dealing with multi-component devices, smartphones, and computer components, calculating the "reasonable royalty" for the specific component encompassing the infringed invention — as opposed to the overall, multi-component product — can be difficult. This can occur, for example, when the infringing product or component does not have an actual, separate price or recorded apportioned cost that can be used as a royalty base price.

In this case, VirnetX alleged that Apple's FaceTime application and VPN On Demand application infringed on a number of its patents (U.S. Patent Nos. 7,418,504 and 7,921,211 by FaceTime; U.S. Patent Nos. 6,502,135 and 7,490,151 by VPN on Demand). VirnetX alleged that both of Apple's applications were native applications included in Apple's iOS operating systems that came pre-installed in its line of consumer electronics hardware, including iPhones, iPods, iPads, iMacs, and MacBooks. VirnetX's damages expert testified to three alternative methods for calculating damages for the infringing Apple's iOS programs. Plaintiff prevailed on most of its infringement claims and the jury awarded $368.2 million in damages.

The Federal Circuit reversed the damages award and rejected each calculation method presented by VirnetX's expert.

(1) Estimated Royalty Base — the "Entire Market Value" and "Smallest Salable Unit"

35 U.S.C. § 284 requires that the reasonable royalty be for use of the invention by the infringer. Courts have interpreted this requirement as to require the parties to provide evidence of a reasonable royalty rate and a proper determination of an estimated royalty base price based on apportionment, such that the reasonable royalty is only applied to the portion of the infringing product that is actually related to the invention, as opposed to the price of a product as a whole.

Apple challenged both the royalty base and royalty rate used by VirnetX in its damage calculations. The Court ruled that VirnetX's use of a 1 percent royalty rate was proper, as VirnetX provided evidence that it maintained a policy of using a 1 percent product rate, as shown by six corresponding licenses in similar negotiations for other patents.

However, the Court rejected VirnetX's royalty base as excessive. VirnetX's expert attempted to exercise one of the exceptions to the apportionment requirement when calculating the royalty base, which the Court deemed improper. The expert presented calculations that cited two exceptions to the apportionment requirement: (1) the Entire Market Value Rule and (2) Smallest-Salable Unit.

Earlier court decisions have repeatedly stated the Entire Market Value Rule exception only applies in instances where the patented feature was driving the demand for the entire multi-component product. However, the instructions provided to the jury in this case presented both the Entire Market Value Rule and the Smallest-Salable Unit calculations as distinct exceptions to the apportionment requirement that could be applied independently in separate damage calculations. The Court concluded that the jury instructions misstated the law, as the Court clarified that the "smallest-salable unit" was to be used as a better starting point from which to apportion the patented features contribution. The Court illustrated the difference by noting that the smallest-salable unit calculation would start at the iOS operating system price of $29, as opposed to the entire iPhone product of $650, from which the expert was to have apportioned the contributions of FaceTime and VPN On Demand to the unit price of $29.

The Court concluded that VirnetX's expert erred in using the entire market value of Apple's products as part of one of his calculations, as the expert did not present any supporting evidence that the FaceTime and VPN On Demand features drove demand for those products. Without such evidence, VirnetX's expert should have been restricted to calculations based on the apportionment of Apple's product prices to the FaceTime and VPN On Demand applications. The Court stated that the use of the smallest-salable unit without an apportionment calculation can only be applied in instances where the smallest-salable unit only includes the patented feature; otherwise, the plaintiff must do more in its process of calculating damages to limit the smallest-salable unit to only the portion that is attributable to the invention.

The Court concluded that VirnetX's expert failed to even estimate the smallest salable unit based on available prices for other Apple product prices (e.g., the price of the iOS by itself, of which FaceTime and VPN On Demand are smaller components). The Court reasoned that the expert should have used apportionment on the smallest unit price when generating his damage calculations. Due to the expert's failure to properly apportion the per-unit price to the infringing applications, the Court ruled that VirnetX's expert's testimony should have been excluded.

(2) Nash Bargaining Solution

The Court similarly rejected alternative damage calculations presented by VirnetX's expert based on the Nash Bargaining Solution, which is a game theory method used by some experts to calculate patent damages. Experts use the Nash Bargaining Solution to determine the outcome of a hypothetical negotiation between the plaintiff and defendant for a license to the infringed patent. As it is not feasible in most situations to determine an actual royalty rate or lump-sum (as the price or rate was never agreed-upon) that would result from the hypothetical negotiation, the Nash Bargaining Solution uses an assumed environment to envision what the hypothetical successful outcome would be.

The Nash Bargaining Solution assumes that in a bargaining problem, the solution to the problem (i.e., the resulting price or rate) would satisfy certain requirements, for example, that parties would receive a good return (i.e., profits from a product) only if a mutual agreement is reached.  In similar patent damages cases, experts have determined that the Nash Bargaining Solution would result in a 50/50 split between the plaintiff and defendant of the profits related to the negotiated patented technology.

The Court found that the Nash Bargaining Solution is based on a list of premises such that application to any patent infringement scenario is only a rule of thumb, akin to the "25 percent rule" for royalty rates that has similarly been rejected by a string of cases by the court. The Court ruled that VirnetX's expert failed to provide any evidence to suggest that the situation between VirnetX and Apple was in fact similar to the premises assumed by the Nash Bargaining Solution.


As demonstrated in this case, the Federal Circuit has emphasized that damage calculations in patent infringement cases must be based on rigorous efforts to assess royalty rates based on apportionment, that is a close fit between the royalty rate or per-unit royalty amount to the actual cost of the infringing component. The emphasis on apportionment will likely limit damages in future cases, as plaintiffs must provide ample evidence to show that a certain infringing feature either was a major apportioned value of the overall price or that the feature had an actual impact on the price of the infringing multi-component product to drive the value of the entire product or some large portion of it. Further, limitations on damages may encourage defendants to determine potential damages in a case earlier, as smaller damage ceilings may alter the parties' strategy during litigation.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions