United States: Committee Members’ Professional Fees And Expenses: To Pay Or Not To Pay, That Is The Question

Last Updated: September 24 2014
Article by Ingrid Bagby and Michele C. Maman

The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entered a decision in Davis v. Elliot Management Corp., et al. (In re Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc.) addressing the applications for payment of professional fees in the approximate total amount of $26 million submitted by certain members of the official committee of unsecured creditors appointed under Section 1102 of the Bankruptcy Code in the historical and unprecedented bankruptcy cases of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and its affiliated debtors. The authors of this article discuss the case and its implications.

The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entered a decision in Davis v. Elliot Management Corp., et al. (In re Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc.)1addressing the applications for payment of professional fees in the approximate total amount of $26 million submitted by certain members of the official committee of unsecured creditors (the "Committee") appointed under Section 1102 of the Bankruptcy Code—i.e. an official committee—in the historical and unprecedented bankruptcy cases of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and its affiliated debtors (collectively, the "Debtors"). At issue before the district court was an appeal by the United States Trustee for Region 2 (the "UST") from the February 15, 2013 decision of Judge James Peck of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, pursuant to which Judge Peck granted an omnibus application (the "Application") for the payment of fees and reimbursement of expenses claimed by individual members of the Committee despite an objection by the UST. In a decision that was viewed with surprise by some, the district court disagreed with the bankruptcy court as to the permissibility of the fees and expenses, and remanded the matter back to the bankruptcy court for further adjudication. The Committee members thereafter filed a motion—albeit unsuccessful—seeking immediate certification for interlocutory appeal of the district court's order to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) with respect to the district court's reversal of the bankruptcy court's decision insofar as it awarded the fees as permissible consensual plan payments.

Specifically, as acknowledged by the bankruptcy court, the dispute as to whether to allow the professional fees of Committee members highlights the potential ability to use Chapter 11 plan provisions as a means to authorize and effectuate the payment of professional fees in instances where such fees would otherwise likely not qualify as recoverable administrative expenses under Sections 503(b)(3) and 503(b)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code.2


Section 503(b)(3) of the Bankruptcy Code sets forth those fees that, after notice and a hearing, shall be allowed as administrative expenses. In particular, Section 503(b)(3)(F) includes the fees of "a member of a committee appointed under section 1102 [of the Bankruptcy Code], if such expenses are incurred in the performance of the duties of such committee."3Meanwhile, Section 503(b)(4) authorizes the "reasonable compensation for professional services rendered by an attorney. . ..of an entity whose expense is allowable under subparagraph (A), (B), (C), (D), or (E) of paragraph (3) of this subsection, based on the time, the nature, the extent, and the value of such services, and the cost of comparable services other than in a case under this title, and reimbursement for actual, necessary expenses incurred by such attorney. . .."4 Notably, subparagraph (F) of Section 503(b)(3) is not mentioned in the list of subsections enumerated in Section 503(b)(4). Accordingly, as the Lehman bankruptcy court explained, when read collectively, these provisions seemingly authorize official committee members to seek reimbursement for expenses incurred in connection with their service on the committee, but not for professional services rendered to individual committee members.5

Based on the foregoing statutory analysis, the Lehman bankruptcy court concluded that the fees sought by the Committee members in the Application did not qualify for payment in the ordinary course as administrative expenses under Sections 503(b)(3) and 503(b)(4). However, by what was presumably intentional draftsmanship in attempt to circumvent the very issues that are now in play before the courts, Section 6.7 of the Debtors' Chapter 11 plan (the "Plan") expressly secured the right to payments of such fees for the Committee members, notwithstanding the absence of any statutory basis therefore. Indeed, Section 6.7 of the Plan "introduce[d] what amount[ed] to a contractual patch designed to cure these statutory omissions, and therein lies the rub." Given the fact that the requested fees were not explicitly authorized under the Bankruptcy Code, but nevertheless were authorized under the Plan, the question before the bankruptcy court put at stake "important appearance and policy issues: should members of any official committee who by statute have a central role in plan negotiations be allowed to use the plan process for their own financial gain and should they be able to realize benefits that the Bankruptcy Code ordinarily would not sanction?" Notably, while payment of such fees may not be expressly referenced within the Bankruptcy Code itself, the Bankruptcy Code nonetheless considered the purported banality of using a Chapter 11 plan to achieve permissible "desired economic outcomes" and to reflect consensual arrangements between debtors and their stakeholders.

The UST's objection to the Committee members' Application advanced what the bankruptcy court ultimately described as an "overly restrictive reading of section 503(b)" and was premised on the presumption that Section 503(b) was the "exclusive pathway" by which the Committee members could potentially be entitled to receive compensation. In other words, the UST's reading of the Bankruptcy Code argued that Section 503(b) not only eliminates the potential for members of an official committee to recover fees thereunder, but also forecloses any ability for such amounts to be recovered by other permissible means within the Chapter 11 context-such as under the Plan. In contrast, the Committee members argued that Section 503(b) is not the only mechanism for approval of administrative expenses for professional fees and expenses, and that courts may also properly look to other potentially applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code-namely Section 1129(a)(4)-which permits a bankruptcy court to approve a restructuring plan if payments made for services or costs and expenses in connection with the case or plan are found to be reasonable.

Ultimately, the bankruptcy court was persuaded by the Committee members' arguments and ruled that, if upheld, the UST's argument "would negate in absolute terms the possibility of plan treatment that might offer to compensate members of an official committee for their individual professional fees under any and all circumstances." Notably, the bankruptcy court categorized the UST's argument as flawed in that it presumed that Section 504(b) "functions as a trump card that extends across the Bankruptcy Code to block the formulation of a plan that proposes independent grounds for granting comparable payment rights." Further, the bankruptcy court highlighted that the UST's argument failed to consider not only the broad leeway that debtors have pursuant to Section 1123(b)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code, but also the discretion and authority afforded to bankruptcy courts under Section 1129(a)(4) to approve reasonable payments.6Indeed, as the bankruptcy court stated, "[t]o fulfill its reorganization purposes, a plan must be an endlessly adaptable tool that fits the particular needs and dynamics of each case. The free expression of plan proponents should not be restrained except to the extent of complying with the requirements of the Bankruptcy Code that govern plan content."


Ingrid Bagby is a partner at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, focusing her practice on bankruptcy, restructuring, and commercial litigation. Michele C. Maman is an associate at the firm. The authors may be contacted at ingrid.bagby@cwt.com and michele.maman@cwt.com, respectively.

1 Davis v. Elliot Mgmt. Corp. (In re Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc.), 508 B.R. 283 (S.D.N.Y. 2014).

2 In re Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc., 487 B.R. 181, 183–184 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2013).

3 11 U.S.C. § 503(b)(3)(F).

4 11 U.S.C. § 503(b)(4).

5 In re Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc., 487 B.R. 189-190 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2013).

6 Further, the bankruptcy court noted its "general repository of power" under Section 105(a) of the Bankruptcy Code to "issue any order, process, or judgment that is necessary or appropriate to carry out the provisions of [the Bankruptcy Code]." In re Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc., 487 B.R. 190 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2013) (quoting 11 U.S.C. § 105(a)).

Originally published in Pratt's Journal of Bankruptcy Law

Click here to download full article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions