United States: Upcoming Changes To Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure: Modernizing Scope Of Discovery And Clarifying Consequences Of Failure To Preserve

Last Updated: September 23 2014

If you practice in federal court, pay close attention to the changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure arriving in 2015.  Implementing the so-called "Duke Rules Package" developed at a 2010 Federal Rules Advisory Committee meeting held at Duke University, upcoming changes recommended by the Advisory Committee focus on three main areas:  (1) early judicial case management; (2) the scope of discovery and (3) litigants' failure to preserve electronically stored information.

A. Speeding things up.  Many of the proposed changes are intended to reduce delays at the beginning of litigation.   Proposed Rule 4(m) shortens the time period for serving a defendant 120 days to 90.   If service is not effected by that point, the court may dismiss the suit for failure to prosecute.  After service, the initial scheduling conference pursuant to proposed Rule 16(b)(1) must "involve direct simultaneous communication"—whether in person, by telephone, or by videoconference—the Rules Committee believing that direct communication will avoid time delays created by correspondence. 

Further streamlining is seen in proposed Rule 16(b)(2), which requires the  judge to issue a scheduling order 90 days after any service upon defendant (reduced from 120 days) or 60 days after any defendant has appeared (down from 90).  Similarly, the new Rule 26(d)(2) allows discovery to start earlier:  Rule 34 Requests for Production are permitted 21 days after service of process, even if this is before the discovery "kick off" of the initial Rule 26(f) scheduling conference.

B.  Proportionality is key to scope of discovery.  In order to limit ever-increasing discovery costs, the Advisory Committee made wholesale changes to Rule 26(b)(1), which defines the scope of discovery.  The new Rule 26(b)(1) limits discovery to that which is "proportional to the needs of the case" and provides five illustrative factors for courts to consider. 

Another notable change to Rule 26(b)(1) is to eliminate the phrase "reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence."  Generations of lawyers have labored under the misimpression that the scope of federal discovery is so broad that anything "reasonably calculated to lead the discovery of admissible evidence" is fair game.  The Rules Committee tried without success to revise that sentence in previous proposed amendments, and has written committee notes making clear that it does not establish a bedrock definition for the  scope of discovery.  Nevertheless, many practitioners and courts stick to the notion that a litigant can obtain discovery of virtually anything that's "reasonably calculated" to lead to something helpful in the case.  Accordingly, the Advisory Committee eliminated this language in order to emphasize that discovery should not be permitted beyond the defined scope.  (See April 10-11, 2014 Report of Advisory Civil Rules at 86-87.) 

These changes will amend Rule 26(b)(1) as follows:

Current Rule 26(b)(1) (emphasis added)

Scope in General. Unless otherwise limited by court order, the scope of discovery is as follows: Parties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party's claim or defense— including the existence, description, nature, custody, condition, and location of any documents or other tangible things and the identity and location of persons who know of any discoverable matter. For good cause, the court may order discovery of any matter relevant to the subject matter involved in the action. Relevant information need not be admissible at the trial if the discovery appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. All discovery is subject to the limitations imposed by Rule 26(b)(2)(C).

Proposed Rule 26(b)(1) (emphasis added)

Scope in General. Unless otherwise limited by court order, the scope of discovery is as follows: Parties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party's claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case, considering the amount in controversy, the importance of the issues at stake in the action, the parties' resources, the importance of the discovery in resolving the issues, and whether the burden or expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit. Information within this scope of discovery need not be admissible in evidence to be discoverable.

C.  More Clearly Defined Consequences for Failure to Maintain ESI.   The final category of recommended changes are those designed to address preservation of electronically stored information, or "ESI."  Whereas the old rule 37(e) merely cautioned against imposing sanctions for a good faith failure to properly preserve discoverable ESI, the new Rule 37(e)(1) provides courts with a menu of remedies to address failures to preserve ESI that "should have" been maintained, including "measures no greater than necessary to cure" the loss of ESI or resulting prejudice. 

If the court determines that a party acted with "intent to deprive," the court may impose sanctions including instructing the jury that it may or must presume that the lost ESI would have been unfavorable to the party who destroyed it, dismissal of the action, or entry of default judgment.  Rule 37(e) also includes a list of four factors for courts to consider when crafting an appropriate remedy.  The inclusion of these guideposts is intended to harmonize the approaches to ESI loss and destruction developed in the various federal circuits.  These changes will amend Rule 37(e) as follows:

Current Rule 37(e)

Failure to Provide Electronically Stored Information.  Absent exceptional circumstances, a court may not impose sanctions under these rules on a party for failing to provide electronically stored information lost as a result of the routine, good-faith operation of an electronic information system.

Proposed Rule 37(e) (emphasis supplied)

Failure to Preserve Electronically Stored Information.  If a party failed to preserve electronically stored information that should have been preserved in the anticipation or conduct of litigation, the court may:

(1) Order measures no greater than necessary to cure the loss of information, including permitting additional  discovery; requiring the party to produce information that would otherwise not be reasonably accessible; and ordering the party to pay the reasonable expenses caused by the loss, including attorney's fees.

(2) Upon a finding of prejudice to another party from loss of the information, order measures no greater than necessary to cure the prejudice.

(3) Only upon a finding that the party acted with the intent to deprive another party of the information's use in the litigation:

(A) presume that the lost information was unfavorable  to the party;
(B) instruct the jury that it may or must presume the  information was unfavorable to the party; or
(C) dismiss the action or enter a default judgment.

(4) In applying Rule 37(e), the court should consider all  relevant factors, including:

(A) the extent to which the party was on notice that  litigation was likely and that the information would be relevant;
(B) the reasonableness of the party's efforts to  preserve the information;
(C) the proportionality of the preservation efforts to  any anticipated or ongoing litigation; and
(D) whether, after commencement of the action, the  party timely sought the court's guidance on any unresolved disputes about preserving discoverable  information.

Odds and Ends.  Among the issues left unresolved is who bears the burden of showing that the discovery sought is proportional.  In comments submitted to the Advisory Committee regarding the new Rule 26(b)(1), noted e-Discovery authority Hon. Shira Scheindlin (S.D.N.Y.) observed that the new concept of proportionality "invites producing parties to withhold information based on a unilateral determination that the production of certain requested information is not proportional....  That will mean the requesting party must make a
motion, at considerable expense."  (See April 10-11, 2014 Report of Advisory Civil Rules at 206.)  Although the Advisory Committee states that the new Rule 26(b)(1) is not intended to place the burden of proving proportionality on the party seeking discovery (id. at 84),  it remains to be seen whether the change will precipitate boilerplate refusals to produce information on the ground that it is not proportional. 

The recommended changes are now in the hands of the Federal Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure, which meets in October 2014 to evaluate the proposals and whether to pass them along to the U.S. Supreme Court, which has final authority to promulgate the FRCP under the Rules Enabling Act of 1934.

Louisville Bar Association's Bar Briefs, September 2014

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions