ARTICLE
23 September 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Updates - September 2014

W
WilmerHale

Contributor

WilmerHale provides legal representation across a comprehensive range of practice areas critical to the success of its clients. With a staunch commitment to public service, the firm is a leader in pro bono representation. WilmerHale is 1,000 lawyers strong with 12 offices in the United States, Europe and Asia.
Federal Circuit Patent Updates - September 2014
United States Intellectual Property

Facebook, Inc. v. Pragmatus AV, LLC (No. 2013-1350, 9/11/14) (Moore, O'Malley, Taranto)

September 11, 2014 6:30 PM

Moore, J. Although patent had not expired when it was before the Board, which therefore applied the broadest reasonable interpretation standard to claim construction, the Court construed the claims under Phillips because the patent had expired by the time of appeal. However, the Court's construction under Phillips was broader than the Board's construction, so the Board's construction was necessarily erroneous even under the broadest reasonable interpretation standard.

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

Scientific Plastic Products v. Biotage AB (No. 2013-1219, -1220, -1221, 9/10/14) (Newman, Moore, Wallach)

September 10, 2014 12:15 PM

Newman, J. Affirming Boards rejection of claims as obvious in inter partes reexamination. The Board was correct in viewing cited art as "analogous" where art had the same purpose as the claimed invention. Moore, J., dissented.

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

Interval Licensing LLC v. AOL, Inc. (No. 2013-1282, -1283, -1284, -1285, 9/10/14) (Taranto, Chen)

September 10, 2014 5:10 PM

Chen, J. Affirming judgment that certain claims were invalid as indefinite, while reversing claim construction of other claims. Claim phrase "in an unobtrusive manner" that "does not distract a user" had "too uncertain a relationship to the patents' embodiments" to "provide a reasonably clear and exclusive definition."

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

EPOS Technologies, Ltd. v. Pegasus Technologies, Ltd. (No. 2013-1330, 9/5/14) (Bryson, Hughes)

September 5, 2014 10:24 AM

Hughes, J. Reversing summary judgment of non-infringement of claims to digital pens. The district court erred in construing claims to be limited to features of a preferred embodiment and, in one instance, construed claims to exclude the preferred embodiment. The district court also misapplied the all elements rule in finding no infringement under the doctrine of equivalents.

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

Buysafe, Inc. v. Google, Inc.. (No. 2013-1575, 9/3/14) (Taranto, Hughes)

September 3, 2014 3:20 PM

Taranto, J. Affirming judgment that claims directed to means for guaranteeing a party's performance of an online transaction were invalid under Section 101.

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More