United States: Smith & Wesson Settlement Raises FCPA Concerns For U.S. Businesses, May Establish A New Claim For An Insufficient Compliance Program

On July 28, 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced the settlement of charges under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act against Smith & Wesson Holding Corp. for violations involving improper payments to Pakistani, Turkish and Indonesian officials to secure minor firearm supply contracts.1 Kara Brockmeyer, chief of the SEC Enforcement Division's FCPA Unit, described the action as a ''wake-up call for small and medium-size businesses that want to enter into high-risk markets and expand their international sales.''2 Smith & Wesson agreed to pay more than $2 million and to provide ongoing reporting about FCPA compliance to settle the charges, which included violations of the FCPA's anti-bribery, books and records, and internal control provisions.3

Such charges are typical of those brought in recent years against U.S. businesses operating in foreign jurisdictions that the SEC and U.S. Department of Justice view as posing significant corruption risk. However, the SEC's order is notable for several reasons, both with respect to the nature of the conduct and the scope of what the SEC seems to provide as a basis for its action. First, the bribes and contracts at issue appear to be relatively small. Additionally, the SEC offered an unusually detailed description of Smith & Wesson's failure to implement anticorruption controls specific to the conduct of third-party agents abroad. Moreover, the commission seemed to imply that the simple failure to have an adequate FCPA compliance program could constitute a securities violation.

Recent Focus on High Value Corporate Targets

The SEC and DOJ's increasing focus on FCPA enforcement has been well publicized.4 Although the number of enforcement actions brought by the SEC and DOJ has declined since its 2010 peak, FCPA enforcement has remained robust, with the SEC or DOJ bringing 27 corporate FCPA actions in 2013, and 23 such actions in 2012. Perhaps most notable among recent trends has been the increase in the average price of a corporate FCPA resolution, which, including DOJ and SEC fines, penalties, disgorgement and prejudgment interest, has increased fourfold from 2012 to 2013, with the 2013 average totaling more than $80 million. Taken together, these trends suggest a narrowing of the government's enforcement strategy to fewer, but higherpriced actions.

The Smith & Wesson Matter

The Smith & Wesson settlement breaks that trend. During the period that is the focus of the SEC's order, Smith & Wesson's international business accounted for only about 10 percent of the company's revenues—the SEC order itself notes that the company's international business was only in its ''developing stages.''5 The bribes identified by the SEC in its order were small compared to those that have been the subject of other recent FCPA enforcement actions, as were the benefits to Smith & Wesson. In one example cited in the SEC's order, Smith & Wesson retained a third-party agent in Pakistan in 2008 to help the company obtain a deal to sell firearms to a Pakistani police department. During the arrangement, Smith & Wesson employees authorized the agent to provide roughly $11,000 in guns to Pakistani police officials as gifts and to make additional cash payments. Smith & Wesson ultimately won the contract with the Pakistani police to sell 548 pistols for a profit of just $107,852.6 The other bribes at issue appear to be not only small, they were all unsuccessful or the relevant contracts were subsequently canceled. The SEC's order also cites Smith & Wesson's authorization of illicit payments through third-party agents to secure firearm sales contracts in Indonesia, Turkey, Nepal and Bangladesh.7 However, Smith & Wesson ultimately failed to secure contracts in those jurisdictions or canceled the contracts in light of the SEC's enforcement action.

Despite the small and unsuccessful nature of the bribes authorized, the penalties paid by Smith & Wesson still reached almost $2 million.8 To resolve the matter, Smith & Wesson agreed to pay $107,852 in disgorgement, $21,040 in prejudgment interest and a $1.906 million penalty. Smith & Wesson also halted pending international sales transactions, consented to the implementation of a series of compliance improvements, terminated its entire international sales staff and will report to the SEC on its FCPA compliance efforts for a period of two years.9

Scrutiny of Small and Mid-Sized Businesses Operating Abroad

As discussed, this action represents a significant shift from the SEC and DOJ's enforcement efforts in 2013, which focused on high-value targets and included two resolutions—those with Total, S.A. and Weatherfold International Ltd.—that ranked among the 10 largest FCPA settlements ever and involved multi-million dollar payments to government officials.10 As contrasted to the small, largely unsuccessful, and authorized-but-notpaid bribes described in the SEC's Smith & Wesson order, Total, S.A., was charged with utilizing intermediaries between 1995 and 2004 to make approximately $60 million in improper payments to the chairman of a wholly owned subsidiary of the National Iranian Oil Company, to obtain the rights to develop oil and gas fields in Iran, resulting in $153 million in illicit profits.11 Similarly, Weatherford was charged with making corrupt payments through its subsidiaries and third-party representatives to obtain or retain business worth $59.3 million in profits in Albania, Algeria, Angola, Congo, Iraq and another, unnamed Middle Eastern country.12

The Smith & Wesson matter therefore represents a potential extension of the SEC's ''Broken Windows'' strategy first announced by former Enforcement Division Director Robert Khuzami and reiterated by Chairman Mary Jo White—i.e., the resolution to pursue small infractions on the theory that minor violations lead to larger ones by fostering a culture where laws are treated as toothless—to the FCPA space.13 As highlighted by Ms. Brockmeyer's quote above, Smith & Wesson serves as a warning that the SEC is expanding its FCPA enforcement efforts beyond high-value targets to small or mid-size businesses that previously slipped under the radar.

Eye on Adequate Compliance Systems

The charges against Smith & Wesson are also notable for their seeming inclusion of an unusual basis for a charge: Section 13(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, for failure to establish an appropriate system of internal controls designed to address the bribery risk posed by the company's use of third-party sales agents in foreign jurisdictions, as well as to have adequate FCPA-related training. The SEC may be seeking to expand its authority with this enforcement action to establish precedent that the mere failure of a public company to have an adequate anticorruption compliance program could constitute a securities law violation.

Past SEC and DOJ FCPA enforcement actions have included charges for internal control violations. These charges, however, have all focused on the failure to have a system in place to ensure that transactions are adequately described in the company's records (e.g., bribes were listed as commissions or hidden in other charges). These cases are consistent with the terms of Section 13(b)(2)(B), which provides that every public company shall ''devise and maintain a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that . . . transactions are recorded'' accurately.

However, the Smith & Wesson order states as follows:

While the company had a basic corporate policy prohibiting the payment of bribes, it failed to implement a reasonable system of controls to effectuate that policy. For example, Smith & Wesson failed to devise adequate policies and procedures with regard to commission payments, the use of samples for test and evaluation, gifts, and commission advances. Further, Smith & Wesson's FCPA policies and procedures, and its FCPA-related training and supervision were inadequate. . . .

As a result of the conduct described above, Smith & Wesson violated Section 13(b)(2)(B) . . . .''

Thus, although it appears the alleged bribes were not accurately described in the company's records, the SEC seems to base the internal controls violation in this case on the failure to have an appropriate anticorruption compliance system given the relevant risks.

To be clear, every company that engages in business outside the U.S. should establish a risk-based anticorruption program. The existence of such a program is often vital to convincing regulators, to the extent an issue arises, to exercise their discretion and moderate their response to a company's alleged misconduct. Additionally, it is well established under the U.K. Bribery Act that if a bribery situation arises, the failure of a company to have had an adequate anticorruption compliance system can constitute a separate violation from the bribe itself. There are also other unrelated circumstances—for instance, in the investment adviser and broker-dealer context—in which the SEC has statutory authority to bring a case against an entity for the simple failure to have an appropriate compliance system.

To date, however, the prevailing consensus has been that the SEC lacks the statutory authority to bring a case against a public company for the simple failure to have a sufficient anticorruption compliance system. It is difficult to understand how the SEC would have such statutory authority to bring such charges given the limited nature of Section 13, which is focused on the accuracy of books and records, other than as they might relate to a failure to have a system designed to address how payments are recorded.

Conclusion

Large companies that operate in multiple jurisdictions are used to applying a risk-based approach to anticorruption compliance that incorporates variables that include geography, industry and the size of their international business. The Smith & Wesson settlement may change the calculus for U.S. companies both small and large by demonstrating that the SEC intends to scrutinize even minor transactions for corruption risk. The Smith & Wesson action further demonstrates the SEC's willingness to examine the particular strategies employed by companies operating abroad—such as the use of third-party agents—and to compare those strategies to the company's anticorruption policies, going line by line if necessary, to ensure that the policies and controls are crafted to address the individual risks posed by the company's business model. It is concerning, however, that the SEC may be looking to start regulating public company compliance systems in the same manner that it does broker dealers, which at its extreme could lead to cases based on poor compliance systems without proof of any bribes.

As a precaution, companies and their counsel should take care to design internal controls and anticorruption policies tailored to their individual businesses with a particular focus on issues that the SEC has flagged as high-risk, such as the use of third-party sales agents. Companies should perform pre-contractual diligence on third-party agents, provide agents with compliance training, perform periodic assessments of the performance of agents and consider including audit rights in contracts with third-party agents who may interact with government officials in foreign jurisdictions. Critically, U.S. companies operating abroad should be diligent with respect to transactions both large and small, and should empower compliance and legal departments to ensure consistent enforcement of anticorruption policies in all foreign business.

Reproduced with permission from Corporate Accountability Report, 12 CARE 34, 08/22/2014. Copyright 2014 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com

Footnotes

1 Smith & Wesson Agrees to Pay $2M to Settle SEC Probe Into FCPA Violations, 12 CORP. L. & ACCOUNTABILITY REP. 879 (Aug. 1, 2014).

2 U.S. SEC. & EXCH. COMM'N, Release No. 2014-148, SEC Charges Smith & Wesson With FCPA Violations (July 28, 2014), available at http://www.sec.gov/News/PressRelease/Detail/PressRelease/1370542384677#.U-JxsnPD-Uk.

3 Id.

4 E.g., More FCPA Cases in Pipeline, Brockmeyer Says; Some Administrative, 12 CORP. L. & ACCOUNTABILITY REP. 851 (July 25, 2014).

5 U.S. SEC. & EXCH. COMM'N, Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Release No. 72678, In the Matter of Smith & Wesson Holding Corp. (July 28, 2014).

6 Id. at 3.

7 Id. at 3–4.

8 U.S. SEC. & EXCH. COMM'N, Release No. 2014-148, SEC Charges Smith & Wesson With FCPA Violations (July 28, 2014), available at http://www.sec.gov/News/PressRelease/Detail/PressRelease/1370542384677#.U-JxsnPD-Uk.

9 Id.

10 U.S. SEC. & EXCH. COMM'N, Release No. 2013-252, SEC Charges Weatherford International With FCPA Violations (Nov. 26, 2013), available at http://www.sec.gov/News/PressRelease/Detail/PressRelease/1370540415694#.UJ6aHPD-Uk; U.S. SEC. & EXCH. COMM'N, Release No. 2013-94, SEC Charges Total S.A. for Illegal Payments to Iranian Official (May 29, 2013), available at http://www.sec.gov/News/PressRelease/Detail/PressRelease/1365171575006#.UJ6G3PD-Uk.

11 U.S. SEC. & EXCH. COMM'N, Release No. 2013-94, SEC Charges Total S.A. for Illegal Payments to Iranian Official (May 29, 2013), available at http://www.sec.gov/News/PressRelease/Detail/PressRelease/1365171575006#.UJ6G3PD-Uk.

12 U.S. SEC. & EXCH. COMM'N, Release No. 2013-252, SEC Charges Weatherford International With FCPA Violations (Nov. 26, 2013), available at http://www.sec.gov/News/PressRelease/Detail/PressRelease/1370540415694#.UJ6aHPD-Uk.

13 E.g., Mary Jo White, Chairman, U.S. SEC. & EXCH. COMM'N, Remarks at the Securities Enforcement Forum (Oct. 9, 2013), available at http://www.sec.gov/News/Speech/Detail/Speech/1370539872100#.U-J73XPD-Uk.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions