United States: "The Evolving Definition Of Occurrence"

In the immortal words of Bob Dylan, the times they are a-changing. In the often placid world of insurance coverage, this change has been most evident with regard to the definition of the term "occurrence." The meaning of this term is at the heart of coverage in standard commercial general liability (CGL) policies, and how the definition of occurrence is construed by the courts often determines whether coverage exists. This article will briefly review the traditional view of occurrence as it relates to coverage for faulty products or defective work, an emerging national trend, and recent developments in Pennsylvania.

The Traditional View

The traditional view is that defective products or defective work by the insured are not occurrences. In other words, the existence of a defect in a product or an event in which a defective product injures only itself does not constitute an occurrence. Cases exemplifying the traditional view include: Auto-Owners Insurance v. Rhodes, 748 S.E.2d 781, 790 (S.C. 2013); Westfield Insurance v. Custom Agri Systems, 979 N.E.2d 269, 273-74 (Ohio 2012); Cincinnati Insurance v. Motorists Mutual Insurance, 306 S.W.3d 69, 73-74 (Ky. 2010); Essex Insurance v. Holder, 372 Ark. 535, 539-40 (2008); L-J v. Bituminous Fire & Marine Insurance, 621 S.E.2d 33, 35-37 (S.C. 2005); United States Fidelity & Guaranty v. Advanced Roofing & Supply, 788 P.2d 1227, 1233-34 (Ariz. 1989); and National Union Fire Insurance v. Turner Construction, 986 N.Y.S.2d 74, 77 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014). As a result, the traditional view holds that an occurrence requires the defective work or product to cause bodily injury or property damage to property other than the product itself.

Courts in the traditional camp typically justify their conclusion based on historical precedent and the fact that faulty work does not satisfy the requirement that an occurrence be a fortuitous event. In this context, fortuity typically is described as an event that is both unintended and beyond the control of the insured. Moreover, a number of courts assert that allowing faulty work to fall within the definition of occurrence would inappropriately transform CGL policies into surety bonds.

The Emerging Trend

While the traditional view remains the majority view, there is a growing trend in favor of finding that an occurrence can include the circumstance where defective work results in damage only to the work or product itself (so long as the damage was neither intended nor expected by the insured). Cases exemplifying this trend include: Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Moore & Associates, 216 S.W.3d 302, 307-09 (Tenn. 2007); Lamar Homes v. Mid-Continent Casualty, 242 S.W.3d 1, 16 (Tex. 2007); U.S. Fire Insurance v. J.S.U.B., 979 So.2d 871, 883-84 (Fla. 2007); and Lee Builders v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurace, 137 P.3d 486, 491-93 (Kan. 2006).

These courts tend to justify their conclusions based on the intent of the insured and the structure of the policies. First, they note that occurrences are generally defined as accidents, and providing faulty work is usually an accident from the standpoint of the insured. Next, they note that standard CGL forms have an exclusion for the insured's work. This exclusion, they reason, would be unnecessary if the insured's work was not encompassed within the definition of occurrence. Third, they point to the reasonable expectations of the insured and the fact that ambiguities must be construed against the insurer. Finally, these courts often conclude that the "your work" exclusion prevents the policy from becoming a performance bond and the "your product" exclusion prevents the insurance from becoming a manufacturer's warranty.

Pennsylvania Developments

Where Pennsylvania courts fell in this spectrum was, until recently, a matter of significant debate. In Kvaerner Metals v. Commercial Union Insurance, 908 A.2d 888, 900 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2006), Kvaerner Metals was sued for supplying an allegedly defective coke oven battery. One of Kvaerner's insurers, National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, disclaimed coverage. Kvaerner sued National Union and on appeal the Pennsylvania Supreme Court upheld the disclaimer of coverage, stating that "faulty workmanship does not constitute an 'accident' as required to set forth an occurrence under CGL policies."

The wording of the Kvaerner opinion, in light of Pennsylvania's "gist of the action" doctrine, left some commentators wondering about the status of coverage in the state. This was especially concerning to policyholders, because at least one trial court concluded, based in part on Kvaerner, that faulty workmanship could "never constitute" an accident or occurrence, even where damage resulted to property other than the allegedly defective work, in American Home Assurance v. Trumbull, 2012 Pa. Dist. LEXIS 409, at *32 (Ct. Comm. Pl. Allegheny County Oct. 10, 2012). Therefore, American Home held that the insurers had "no obligation to provide indemnification for any damages caused by faulty workmanship."

This debate has largely been settled by Indalex v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, 83 A.3d 418, 424-26 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2013). Indalex involved allegedly defectively designed or manufactured windows and doors. The defects resulted in water leakage, which in turn resulted in personal injury as well as injury to other property. The Indalex court found that the allegations of the underlying complaint fell within the definition of an occurrence. Significantly, Indalex clarified that Kvaerner was "limited to situations 'where the underlying claims were for breach of contract and breach of warranty, and the only damages were to the [insured's] work product.'" As a result, the Indalex opinion returns Pennsylvania to the ranks of the traditional view of an occurrence.

Legislative Changes

A number of state legislatures have weighed in with regard to the definition of occurrence. This appears to have been driven by a perception that it was necessary to act to prevent courts from moving to a more restrictive coverage position, as reflected in American Home. South Carolina, Arkansas and New Jersey are states where it appears that legislation has codified or attempted to codify the traditional understanding of occurrence, while Colorado is consistent with the emerging trend.

Specifically, South Carolina requires, with regard to construction work, that CGL policies contain "or be deemed to contain" a definition of occurrence that includes "property damage or bodily injury resulting from faulty workmanship, exclusive of the faulty workmanship itself," according to S.C. Code Ann. § 38-61-70 (2013). This statute was subsequently found to be unconstitutional to the extent that it was applied retroactively, in Harleysville Mutual Insurance v. South Carolina, 736 S.E.2d 651, 660 (S.C. 2012). The statute's prospective application, however, is constitutional.

Arkansas requires that a CGL policy "offered for sale in this state shall contain a definition of 'occurrence' that includes ... property damage or bodily injury resulting from faulty workmanship," as in Ark. Code Ann. § 23-79-155 (2014). Arkansas' definition is more expansive than South Carolina's, as it is not limited to construction work. Interestingly, while the Arkansas act does not appear to include the faulty work itself within the definition of occurrence, the preamble to the statute arguably suggests that the legislation was intended to include the faulty work, insofar as the preamble criticizes state court holdings regarding the definition of occurrence and expresses the view of the legislature that "insurance consumers purchase commercial liability insurance ... for the express purpose of limiting their liability for faulty workmanship."

Similarly, a bill was introduced in New Jersey late in 2013 that, if passed, would require insurers to define occurrence, with regard to construction work, in a way that includes "property damage or bodily injury resulting from faulty workmanship." The bill is A. No. 4510, 215th Leg., 1st Sess. (N.J. 2013). The changes proposed by New Jersey are limited to contractors or other construction professionals.

Colorado, on the other hand, passed legislation specifically adopting the emerging trend, at Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-20-808 (2013). The Colorado act was approved in 2010, and overrules General Security Indemnity Co. of Arizona v. Mountain States Mutual Casualty, 205 P.3 529 (Colo. Ct. App. 2009). Specifically, the Colorado act requires that "in the interpretation of insurance policies ... issued to construction professionals ... [a] court shall presume that the work of a construction professional that results in property damage, including damage to the work itself or other work, is an accident unless the property damage is intended and expected by the insured."

Final Thoughts

The construction a court gives to the definition of occurrence can have a powerful impact on coverage. It is, of course, not necessarily the end of the coverage determination. As the Tennessee Supreme Court noted in Moore & Associates, "the recognition that damages may result from an 'occurrence' is only the first step in determining whether damages are afforded coverage under a CGL." If it is determined that an occurrence took place, the analysis must proceed to whether the occurrence is subject to any exclusions contained in the policy, and in product and construction cases the business risk exclusions often play a significant role.

Nevertheless, the definition of occurrence is key. It is the threshold through which any coverage claim must pass, and the times are changing in a significant number of jurisdictions with regard to the construction of this definition. These changes are something both insurers and insureds should monitor closely, as they have the potential to dramatically alter the coverage landscape from one jurisdiction to the next.

Previously published in The Legal Intelligencer - August 2014

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions