United States: Enforcing Contractual Statutes Of Limitations In ERISA Plans

Last term's Supreme Court decision upholding time limitations to sue in ERISA employee welfare benefit plans, as well as the cases decided since by lower courts, provides important guidance to drafters of ERISA plan provisions. Those charged with drafting such plans would be well served to include contractual limitations on the time to sue in order to provide nationwide unanimity in enforcement, avoid the litigation of stale claims, and set expectations of plan participants.

In Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident, Ins. Co, 134 S.Ct. 604, 187 L.Ed. 2d 529 (2013), the United States Supreme Court unanimously held under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA") that a contractual limitation on the time to file suit (sometimes referred to as a contractual statute of limitations) is enforceable unless that period is "unreasonably short" or contrary to a controlling statute. Resolving a circuit split, the Supreme Court further held that the limitations period can begin to run before the participant's cause of action accrues.

Although ERISA Section 413 sets forth a three-year statute of limitations for breach of fiduciary duty claims that extends to six years in the case of fraud or concealment, 29 U.S.C. Section 1113, ERISA does not contain a statute of limitations for denial of benefits claims. Heimeshoff, 134 S.Ct. at 610. As a result, courts typically borrow the most analogous state statute of limitations, which is typically the state statute of limitations for breach of contract cases, as in Hahnemann Univ. Hosp. v. All Shore, Inc., 514 F.3d 300, 305-06 (3d Cir. 2008).

Many ERISA Plans contain provisions that limit when a plan participant may file suit alleging denial of benefits. In Heimeshoff, the Court held that such provisions are generally enforceable. Heimeshoff, 134 S.Ct. at 611-12. The ERISA plan at issue in Heimeshoff provided that "Legal action cannot be taken . . . [more than] three years after the time written proof of loss is required to be furnished according to the terms of the policy." Id. at 609. The Supreme Court found the limitations provision to be enforceable, explaining that "employers have large leeway to design disability and other welfare plans as they fit."

The Court did not hold, however, that such leeway is without limits. Instead, the Supreme Court set forth several grounds for declining to enforce limitations provisions in ERISA plans. First, the Court explained that a limitations provision might be unenforceable if it is unreasonably short. In Heimeshoff, the Supreme Court noted that the participant had one year remaining in the three-year limitations period after the administrative process had completed . The Court concluded that one year was not unreasonably short, reasoning that "[w]e cannot fault a limitations provision that would leave the same amount of time in a case with an unusually long internal review process while providing for a significantly longer period in most cases."

Several subsequent lower courts have held that limitations provisions are not unreasonably short when as little as nine months remain to file suit, such as in Barriero v. N.J. BAC Health Funds, No. 13-1501, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181277 (D.N.J. Dec. 27, 2013), and Tuminello v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., No. 13- 938, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20964 (S.D. N.Y. Feb. 14, 2014). These decisions suggest that plan participants will not find it easy to convince court that a typical ERISA Plan time limitation to sue is unreasonably short.

Second, the Supreme Court held that a limitations provision is unenforceable if it is contrary to a controlling statute. Since Heimeshoff, plan participants have not been successful in applying this exception, as in Kienstra v. Carpenter's Health & Welfare Trust Fund of St. Louis, No. 12-53, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18156 (E.D. MO. Feb. 13, 2014).

Third, the Supreme Court explained that if the "administrator's conduct causes a participant to miss the deadline for judicial review, waiver or estoppel may prevent the administrator from invoking the limitations provision as a defense." Since Heimeshoff, lower courts have not been sympathetic to plan participants on this issue either. For example, in Tuminello, the court rejected a participant's claim that a letter from the defendants regarding his short-term disability benefits claim which told him that he "must file the action in court within one year of the date of the final denial of [his] claim," was grounds for estoppel with respect to his long-term disability claim (for which there was only nine months between the accrual date for the cause of action and the expiration of the limitations period).

Multiple courts have also rejected participant arguments that ERISA plans have an affirmative duty under governing ERISA regulations to specifically include the length of the limitation period for filing suit in their claim denial letters, as in Upadhyay v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., No. 13- 1368, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27675 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 3, 2014) and Wilson v. The Standard Ins. Co., No. 11- 2703, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12111 (N.D. Al., Jan. 31, 2014). And courts have refused to estop ERISA Plans from relying on a limitations provision even if the plan did not provide a copy of the summary plan description to the participant along with the denial letter absent a request to do so.

The most important element of the Supreme Court's ruling is the Court's holding that limitations period can run even before the participant has a right to file suit. This is particularly important in ERISA cases because plan participants are generally required to exhaust their administrative remedies before filing a lawsuit for judicial review of the administrator's decision. Therefore, a participant's right to sue typically does not accrue until the ERISA Plan issues its first denial on appeal. Prior to Heimeshoff, lower courts were split on the issue of whether an employee welfare benefit plan under ERISA could provide that the statute of limitations would begin to run before the participant's cause of action accrued. For example, compare White v. Sun Life Assur. Co. of Canada, 488 F.3d 240 (4th Cir. 2007), which held that the statute of limitations did not begin to run while during the administrative review process, with Mogck v. Unum Life Ins. Co of Am., 292 F.3d 1025, 1028 (9th Cir. 2002), which held that the statute of limitations begins to run as defined by the plan's terms.

The Supreme Court has now resolved the split. In Heimeshoff, the administrative appeal process was not completed until two years of the ERISA Plan's limitations period had passed, leaving only one year for the participant to file suit. The Supreme Court found that the remaining year was not unreasonably short and, therefore, that the limitations provision was enforceable. In doing so, the Supreme Court held that an ERISA Plan may specify when the limitations period will commence, even if the commencement date precedes the date when the cause of action accrues before the administrative process has not been completed. In so doing, the court rejected prior precedents that "often construed statutes of limitations to commence when the plaintiff is permitted to file suit." The Court reasoned that because the duration of the limitations period can be measured only by its start date, both are "an integral part of the limitations provision, and there is no basis for categorically preventing the parties from agreeing on one aspect but not the other." And, in the unusual case where the length of the administrative process leaves a claimant with insufficient time to file suit, lower courts have the "unreasonably short" exception available.

Now that the Supreme Court has resolved these issues, there are many practical reasons why ERISA plan drafters should routinely include reasonable limitations periods within plan provisions. First, including a reasonable limitations period provides nationwide uniformity for ERISA Plans with participants in multiple states. For example, Pennsylvania's statute of limitations for contract claims is four years, New Jersey's is six years, and Louisiana's law is 10 years. Setting a uniform limitations provision in the ERISA plan would apply the same limitations to all participants and avoid the administrative headaches associated with the different laws in different states.

It would also discourage forum shopping by plan participants looking to file suit in jurisdictions with longer statutory limitations periods. Second, because some states have lengthy statutes of limitations for breach of contract claims, inclusion of a shorter limitations period will enable plans to avoid litigation of stale claims.

Third, providing a consistent Plan-wide limitation period allows the ERISA Plan to help its participants set their expectations appropriately.

Originally published by The Legal Intelligencer.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions