United States: California Limits The Duty To Defend Against Liability For Trademark Infringement As An "Advertising Injury"

Last Updated: August 27 2014
Article by Ana Guardado

In June 2014, two courts applying California insurance law limited the scope of an insurer's duty to defend against allegations of trademark infringement within the context of coverage for "personal and advertising injury" under a general liability policy.

At issue in Hartford Casualty Insurance Co. v. Swift Distribution Inc. et al., 59 Cal. 4th 277 (2014) (Hartford), was whether allegations that an insured infringed on a competitor's trademark and presented false and misleading advertisements that were likely to cause consumer confusion and mistake constituted an advertising injury covered under the Hartford liability policy. 

Hartford issued a general commercial liability policy to Ultimate Support Systems that provided a duty to defend and indemnify for "personal and advertising injury" from claims arising from "oral, written, or electronic publication of material that slanders or libels a person or organization or disparages a person's or organization's goods, products or services." Ultimate was sued by a competitor, Multi-Cart, for allegations of patent and trademark infringement and dilution. Ultimate and Multi-Cart both produced and sold collapsible carts used to transport music equipment. Multi-Cart claimed Ultimate's cart was nearly indistinguishable from its patented cart and the similarities were likely to confuse consumers and wrongly suggest the two companies were affiliated. Ultimate tendered defense of the suit to Hartford and Hartford denied coverage on the grounds that the suit did not allege Ultimate disparaged its competitor and therefore the suit did not trigger Hartford's duty to defend.

The Court of Appeal and Supreme Court agreed that Hartford had no duty to defend. According to the Multi-Cart complaint, Ultimate did not mention its competitor's name or product in any of its advertisements. Nonetheless, Ultimate contended the underlying suit contained allegations of disparagement where Multi-Cart claimed Ultimate's product design and brand name led consumers to confuse the two products and that Ultimate's advertisements claiming its product's superiority implied the inferiority of Multi-Cart. The Court disagreed that Multi-Cart's trademark infringement allegations constituted disparagement. The Court reasoned that consumer confusion resulting from similarity may support a claim of patent or trademark infringement but it does not by itself support disparagement. In addition, Ultimate's advertisements contained generic assertions of the company's excellence and "mere puffing" does not necessarily imply a derogatory comparison. Multi-Cart's trademark infringement allegations did not claim that Ultimate expressly asserted or clearly implied Multi-Cart's product was inferior.  

Previously, under Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America v. Charlotte Russe Holding, Inc., 207 Cal.App.4th 969 (2012) (Charlotte Russe), one intermediate appellate court had found a claim of disparagement did not require an express false statement about another party or product, and even inferences of "injurious false statements" could form the basis for a claim of disparagement. In Charlotte Russe, plaintiff clothing producer alleged that retailer sold its products for heavily reduced prices suggesting to consumers that the products were of inferior quality. The court found coverage for "disparagement" because the retailer "published prices" that falsely indicated a premium good was less valuable and the implication of the retailer's pricing was disparaging to the clothing producers.

In Hartford, the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court disagreed with the conclusion from Charlotte Russe that a reduction in price, even a steep reduction, constitutes disparagement because a seller can reduce prices for many legitimate business reasons that do not clearly indicate the seller believes the product is of poor quality. The Hartford court held a claim of disparagement requires a plaintiff show a false or misleading statement that (1) specifically refers to the plaintiff's product or business and (2) clearly derogates that product or business.  The court explained that disparagement without an express injurious false statement about another company or product requires a "clear or necessary inference," and disapproved of Charlotte Russe to the extent that the opinion is inconsistent with this limited scope of disparagement. 

In another recent case, the Ninth Circuit applied California law to limit when a claim for trademark infringement constituted a covered "personal and advertising injury" in Street Surfing, LLC v. Great Am. E&S Ins. Co., 752 F.3d 853 (9th Cir. 2014). In August 2005, Great American issued a general commercial liability policy with coverage for personal and advertising injury liability to inline skateboard company Street Surfing, LLC. The policy contained exclusions for prior publications of injurious material (prior publications exclusion) and injuries arising out of infringement of another's intellectual property rights (intellectual property ("IP") exclusion and advertising injury ("AI") amendment).

In June 2008, Street Surfing was sued for trademark infringement by the registered owner of the trademark "Streetsurfer." The trademark owner alleged that Street Surfing's use of the "Street Surfing" logo and brand name was too similar and therefore a wrongful use of "Streetsurfer" – a trademarked advertising idea. Street Surfing tendered defense of the suit to Great American and Great American denied coverage under the IP exclusion and AI amendment with a reservation of rights to assert other applicable terms, provision, conditions, and/or exclusions. Great American did not specifically rely on the prior publications exclusion in denying coverage. 

Street Surfing filed suit against Great American seeking a declaration that it was obligated to defend and indemnify Street Surfing in the trademark infringement action. Great American conceded the trademark suit was potentially covered as an "advertising injury" under the policy's coverage for "use of another's advertising idea," but rejected Street Surfing's argument that the "slogan infringement" coverage applied. Slogan infringement coverage applies to liability arising from infringing on another's "attention-getting phrase used in advertising or promotion." While it is conceivable the name of a product or business, like "Streetsurfer" may be a "slogan," the underlying allegations and evidence did not suggest that the trademark owner used "Streetsurfer" as a slogan. The trademark suit alleged that Street Surfing wrongfully used "Street Surfing" in its brand name and logo, thereby injuring the trademark owner of "Streetsurfer."

Even though the trademark suit was potentially covered by the policy as an advertising injury, the district court found coverage was precluded by the prior publications exclusion as a matter of law because Street Surfing produced products with the "Street Surfing" logo and brand name before the policy period began.  Street Surfing continued to advertise the "Street Surfing" logo and brand name on different products during the policy period and it argued that each of these publications were a "fresh wrong" that were covered under the policy.

To determine whether coverage was precluded as a matter of law, the court looked to the pleadings and available evidence of when Street Surfing first used the name "Street Surfing," and whether Street Surfing published the allegedly wrongful advertisement before the policy's effective date, August 2005. While the trademark complaint left open the possibility that Street Surfing began wrongfully using the name after August 2005, Street Surfing mentioned that it sold products affixed with its logo and brand name in the Great American policy application -- before the policy period began in August 2005. The court found this extrinsic evidence sufficient to show that Street Surfing first wrongfully used "Street Surfing" advertising before obtaining the policy. Street Surfing's later publications of the "Street Surfing" logo and brand name were substantially similar to its prior publications because Street Surfing's liability arose out of the same alleged wrongful act  (i.e. use of the "Street Surfing" idea).

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling of summary judgment in favor of Great American, finding the prior publications exclusion precluded coverage for the trademark infringement suit as a matter of law.

Disclaimer: This Alert has been prepared and published for informational purposes only and is not offered, nor should be construed, as legal advice. For more information, please see the firm's full disclaimer.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions