ARTICLE
21 August 2014

European Court Rejects Appeal Challenging The Commission’s Dawn Raid Powers

O
Orrick

Contributor

Orrick logo
Orrick is a global law firm focused on serving the technology & innovation, energy & infrastructure and finance sectors. Founded over 150 years ago, Orrick has offices in 25+ markets worldwide. Financial Times selected Orrick as the Most Innovative Law Firm in North America for three years in a row.
On June 25, 2014, the Court of Justice of the European Union dismissed a challenge brought against the European Commission by the French cable manufacturer Nexans SA in which it sought to challenge the Commission’s powers to seize documents in dawn raids.
European Union Antitrust/Competition Law

On June 25, 2014, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) dismissed a challenge brought against the European Commission (Commission) by the French cable manufacturer Nexans SA in which it sought to challenge the Commission's powers to seize documents in dawn raids.

In January 2009, the Commission launched dawn raids at the premises of Nexans France in relation to its potential participation in a suspected cartel in the market for high-voltage cables. The documents inspected during the Commission's raid included business records that concerned projects outside EU markets.

Nexans challenged the inspection decision, and its appeal was partially upheld by the General Court in 2012. The General Court found that the Commission did not have reasonable grounds to seize documents in relation to products other than high-voltage underwater and underground electric cables and associated materials. However, the Commission decision with regard to the geographical scope of its powers was upheld by the General Court.

Nexans, in its appeal against the General Court's decision to the CJEU, argued that the Commission did not have the power to seize documents relating to activities outside the EU and that its decision to inspect was overly broad in its geographic scope and failed to provide a sufficiently precise basis for the inspection.

The CJEU rejected the appeal in its entirety and stated that, "taking account of Commission's suspicions concerning an infringement, which probably had a global reach ... even documents linked to projects located outside the common market were likely to provide relevant information on the suspected infringement."

The full CJEU decision is available here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More