In this newsletter, we provide a snapshot of the principal European, US and global financial regulatory developments of interest to banks, investment firms, broker-dealers, market infrastructures, asset managers and corporates.
Derivatives
European Commission Responds to Frontloading Issue Raised by ESMA
On July 17, 2014, the European Securities and Markets Authority ("ESMA") published a letter from the European Commission (dated July 8, 2014) in response to ESMA's letter on May 8, 2014 regarding the frontloading issue under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation ("EMIR"). Frontloading is the requirement under EMIR for OTC derivatives to be cleared which are entered into after a central counterparty ("CCP") has been authorized/recognized under EMIR to clear certain classes of derivative but before the application of the clearing obligation. The European Commission acknowledges the issues that the frontloading obligation might present but points out that EMIR provides for the potential adjustment of the application of the frontloading obligation through the determination of minimum remaining maturities as adapted for each asset class. The Commission's view is that the frontloading obligation should not be applied before parties could reasonably foresee that contracts would need to be cleared due to the frontloading obligation. Further market participants will only be able to foresee that obligation once the regulatory technical standards ("RTS") on the clearing obligation are published in the Official Journal of the European Union. ESMA's consultation paper on proposed draft RTS on the clearing obligation, released last week, effectively eliminates this as an issue: (i) for derivatives which have at least one non-financial counterparty as a party; (ii) for any transactions entered into prior to the publication in the Official Journal of an RTS specifying an asset class subject to the clearing obligation; and (iii) for instruments of less than six months maturity as at the time of publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of the relevant RTS.
The European Commission's letter is available at:
You may also like to see our related client note on the clearing obligation under EMIR, "Timing and Scope of EU Clearing Obligation for Derivatives" available at:
Compensation
EBA Revised Guidelines on Compensation Information Collection
On July 16, 2014, the European Banking Authority ("EBA") published its revised Guidelines on the data collection exercise regarding high earners and on the remuneration benchmarking exercise. The EBA is obliged to collect this information under the Capital Requirements Directive. The updated Guidelines, which repeal those published on July 27, 2012, provide for the higher quality of collected data and increase the transparency of remuneration that is paid to high earners. The new guidelines will apply to data that is to be collected for performance for the period of 2013.
The Guidelines are available at:
Bank Prudential Regulation and Regulatory Capital
ECB Decision on SSM Reporting
On July 19, 2014, a Decision of the European Central Bank ("ECB") dated July 2, 2014 on the reporting of information and data collected from individual banks and investment firms by national regulators was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. Banks are subject to regular reporting requirements to national regulators for their regulatory capital under the Capital Requirements Regulation ("CRR"). The ECB Decision sets out procedures applicable to national regulators falling within the scope of the Single Supervisory Mechanism ("SSM") for reporting such information to the ECB.
The Decision is available at:
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2014.214.01.0034.01.ENG.
ECB Publishes Note on the Comprehensive Assessment
On July 17, 2014, the ECB published a note on the process for disclosure of results of the Comprehensive Assessment, including the templates showing how the results will be presented, and an update of progress made in the asset quality review and stress test exercise. The results of the Comprehensive Assessment will be published in October. The ECB is conducting a Comprehensive Assessment of 128 banks incorporated in countries within the SSM before it assumes its supervisory role under the SSM in November this year.
The note is available at:
http://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/pr/date/2014/html/pr140717.en.html.
Proposed Guidelines for Determining Systemic Importance of Banks
On July 18, 2014, the EBA began a consultation on proposed Guidelines for national regulators to assess whether a firm should be classified as an 'other' systemically important institution ("O-SII"). Under the CRR, a national regulator may require an O-SII to hold an additional buffer of up to 2 percent of Common Equity Tier 1 capital. The proposed Guidelines establish a two-step process for the determination of whether an institution is an O-SII: (i) using a set of mandatory quantitative indicators; and (ii) using the supervisory judgment of the national regulator. The consultation is open until October 18, 2014.
The consultation paper is available at:
EBA Published Updated Validation Rules for Supervisory Reporting
On July 17, 2014, the EBA published an updated list of validation rules in the implementing technical standards ("ITS") on supervisory reporting. The updated list indicates the rules which have been deactivated. The EBA announced in April 2014 that inaccuracies had been detected in the validation rules included in the ITS on supervisory reporting.
The updated validation rules are available at:
FDIC Issues Guidance Regarding Application of the Basel III Capital Conservation Buffer to S-Corporation Banks
On July 21, 2014, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") clarified how it will evaluate requests by S-Corporation Banks to make dividend payments that would otherwise be prohibited under the Basel III capital conservation buffer. Under the Basel III capital rules, finalized on April 8, 2014, a bank would be prohibited or limited in the amounts of dividends it can pay when its risk-based capital ratios fall below certain thresholds. These rules, imposing a capital conservation buffer, would be scheduled to be phased in during the years 2016-2018, and be fully effective in 2019. The capital conservation buffer requirements allow a bank to request approval from its primary federal regulator to make a dividend payment that would not otherwise be permitted by the rules. The regulator may approve such request if warranted based on safety-and-soundness considerations. Under the new guidance issued by the FDIC and absent significant safety-and-soundness concerns about the requesting bank, the FDIC announced that it generally would expect to approve exception requests by well-rated S-corporation banks that are limited to the payment of dividends to cover shareholders' taxes on their portion of an S-corporation's earnings.
The full text of the FDIC guidance is available at:
http://www.fdic.gov/news/news/financial/2014/fil14040.html.
OCC Proposes New Rules for Annual Stress Tests
On July 17, 2014, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency ("OCC") proposed new rules aimed at adjusting the timing of the annual stress testing cycle and clarifying the method used to calculate regulatory capital in the stress tests. The proposal shifts the dates of the annual stress testing cycle by approximately three months. For example, a stress testing cycle that, under the current rule, begins on October 1, 2015, would instead begin on January 1, 2016. In addition, the proposal would provide that no covered institution would be required to use the advanced approaches capital methodology in its stress testing projections until the stress testing cycle scheduled to begin on January 1, 2016.
The full text of the OCC proposal is available at:
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-07-01/pdf/2014-14416.pdf.
Federal Agencies Announce Technical Revision of Risk-Based Capital Rules
On July 16, 2014, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System ("Federal Reserve Board"), the FDIC and the OCC jointly finalized a technical correction of the definition of "eligible guarantee" in the agencies' risk-based capital rules. The correction clarifies the definition of "eligible guarantee" by elaborating on the types of guarantees that can be recognized for purposes of calculating a banking organization's regulatory capital. The correction impacts banking organizations that calculate their regulatory capital ratios under the advanced approaches framework, which generally applies to large international banking organizations with at least $250 billion in total consolidated assets or at least $10 billion in total on-balance sheet foreign exposures. The final rule becomes effective on October 1, 2014.
The full text of the final rule revising the definition of "eligible guarantee" is available at:
http://www.fdic.gov/news/board/2014/2014-07- 15_notice_sum_b_fr.pdf.
To view the full report please click here.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
