United States: Don’t Try This At Home Or Abroad: Export Controls And Sanctions Violations Lead To $21 Million In Penalties For Dutch Company Fokker Services B.V.

We frequently discuss enforcement actions in this blog, because understanding enforcement is a key aspect of trade compliance.  From a fifty-thousand foot view, each enforcement case serves as a cautionary tale about the overall need for compliance.  On a more granular level, enforcement actions provide valuable insight into how the government thinks about and targets violations of law.  These cases also showcase key details about international business practices that might pose "red flags," and let us learn from others' mistakes.  Effective compliance requires companies to commit high-level attention and large dollar amounts, but also requires entities to critically respond to the facts and details of particular markets on the ground.

The June 5 settlement of Netherlands-based aerospace service provider Fokker Services, B.V. ("Fokker") with three different U.S. government agencies is a great learning tool.  The proposed penalties against Fokker totaled $21 million for violations of U.S. economic sanctions (on Iran, Sudan, and Burma) and U.S. export controls laws, arising from Fokker's unauthorized exports of aircraft spare parts from the United States.

In a significant recent twist, on July 9, Judge Richard Leon of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia delayed signing off on the deal, voicing "great concerns" about certain aspects of the settlement terms.  A hearing has been scheduled for July 24, 2014 to address some of these concerns.


Legal Framework.  The Export Administration Regulations ("EAR"), which are administered by the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security ("BIS"), control exports and re-exports of commercial items such as aircraft parts, for both national security and foreign policy reasons.  The EAR covers all items listed on the Commerce Control List that either are in the United States or are of U.S. origin, wherever located.  To export or re-export commercial aircraft parts to Iran or Sudan, a company must get appropriate licenses from BIS, or, in some cases, the U.S. Treasury Department, Office of Foreign Assets Control ("OFAC").

Under U.S. sanctions laws, which are administered by OFAC, U.S. companies and individuals are prohibited from providing virtually any goods or services to Iran, whether directly or indirectly.  In addition, no U.S. company may engage in any transaction or dealing in (including selling, transporting, swapping, financing, or facilitating) or related to goods or services for exportation, re-exportation, sale, or supply, directly or indirectly, to Iran.  With a few exceptions, the trade embargo on Sudan also restricts U.S. companies and individuals from doing business with Sudan.  U.S. restrictions on Burma historically restricted many transactions with Burma by U.S. persons, including investment in Burma and imports of Burmese products to the United States.

There are both civil and criminal penalties for violations of the EAR and the sanctions regime: up to $1 million and 20 years in prison for criminal violations; up to $250,000 or twice the value of the prohibited transaction for each civil violation; and the potential denial of export privileges.

The Alleged Schemes.  From 2005 to 2010, Fokker allegedly employed several schemes aimed at avoiding U.S. export laws and sanctions to do business in sanctioned countries.  These "work-arounds," as described in court documents, allegedly included withholding aircraft tail numbers or providing false tail numbers to repair shops, and asserting falsely that U.S. parts submitted for repair were for general inventory.  Fokker also allegedly maintained a separate database of end users in sanctioned countries and a "black list" of U.S. companies with whom they refused to do business, because those companies had more sophisticated export control compliance systems.  Moreover, Fokker's President purportedly ignored advice of the company's export compliance manager and in-house counsel that no U.S.-origin parts should be shipped to Iran.

According to the settlement documents, Fokker voluntarily self-disclosed the matter in 2010, although whether the government knew of the violations prior to the self-disclosure is now being questioned by Judge Leon.  After actually or attempting to disclose, the company conducted an in-depth internal investigation.  Ultimately, the company was charged with 1,112 violations of the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations, 41 violations of the Sudanese Sanctions Regulations, and 253 violations of the EAR.  Those violations included transactions involving Iranian military end users and violations of a denial order in place against Iran Air.  The U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia, citing shipments to Burma in addition to Iran and Sudan, charged Fokker criminally for conspiracy to violate the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which serves as the statutory authority for most U.S. economic sanctions programs.


Re-Exports and Non-U.S. Companies.  The Fokker case serves as a reminder that U.S. export controls follow U.S.-origin goods even when they are being re-exported.  This aspect of U.S. export controls essentially mandates that non-U.S. businesses who trade in U.S. goods must comply with U.S. law; the Fokker settlement highlights the willingness and ability of U.S. enforcement agencies to pursue actions against non-U.S. companies.  In the past few years, we have seen the largest historical penalties involving sanctions violations in cases against non-U.S. companies, especially in the financial sector.  The Fokker settlement may be seen as an extension of that trend to non-U.S. businesses outside of the financial sector.

The Fokker case should also remind U.S. companies that their non-U.S. partners can pose a risk through resale of U.S.-origin items to sanctioned countries or other controlled destinations.  Fokker's concealment of its activity is somewhat extraordinary, and the measures that Fokker took to conceal its transactions with sanctioned countries from U.S. companies suggest that the U.S.-parts suppliers were not complicit in the activity.  Nonetheless, we would not be surprised if Fokker's suppliers received inquiries or suggestions from the Government about the need to upgrade their export controls compliance programs.

Proving the absence of knowledge in retrospect can be an uphill battle, especially in the midst of a government inquiry.  As such, the Fokker settlement highlights the importance of targeted, risk-based due diligence that begins with an understanding of international diversion risks for any given market.

Using Exceptions.  Fokker's apparent use of the "inventory exception" under U.S. economic sanctions is notable.  As practitioners familiar with the field know, that generally recognized exception allows for shipments into general inventory of a distributor even if the distributor sells some items to sanctioned countries, provided that the U.S. person does not know that its parts are destined for the sanctioned countries.

It appears that Fokker deliberately misused this exception to justify shipments from the United States.  For non-U.S. companies, the takeaway is simple: either use the exception appropriately or risk enforcement.  For a U.S. supplier, the lesson is more difficult.  Spotting misuse of the inventory exception by a non-U.S. distributor can be very tough; but one key step to protecting against this type of activity is training the workforce to understand red flags that may signal directed shipments in paperwork or other interactions with a non-U.S. distributor.

The Role of the Court.  The recent developments in the Fokker case highlight the complications that may arise after a company is basking in the relief of a settlement announcement.  It's not over until it's (really) over.  More than a month after the settlement was announced, Judge Leon expressed his apprehensions about the relative leniency of the penalty amount, the lack of criminal charges against the individuals involved, and a media report raising a question of whether the government knew about the violations in 2008, long before Fokker's apparent self-disclosure.  The Court has also asked that the parties submit filings comparing how Fokker's proposed settlement matches up against other deferred prosecution agreements.  Last year, we discussed how Judge Leon's questioning of a proposed settlement between IBM and the Securities and Exchange Commission for alleged books and records violations possibly contributed to an expanded investigation of the Company, and may have complicated the enforcement picture.  Here, there is no indication yet of additional investigations, although the Court's involvement may lead to harsher penalties.

The Role of Compliance.  OFAC noted in its settlement documents that Fokker had no compliance program in place during the five-year period when the violations occurred.  U.S. Attorney Ronald C. Machen said that Fokker "treated U.S. export laws as inconveniences to be 'worked around' through deceit and trickery."  The company undertook several corrective actions in response to the matter, including establishing a formal compliance program.

Let's face it.  Aligning business interests and compliance is tricky.  While business people may understand that compliance is necessary, compliance professionals often have to persuade business development personnel to see compliance as anything other than a burden.  That is especially true where, as was apparently the case with Fokker, there was not a clear tone from the top about the importance of compliance.

But Fokker may be useful in helping compliance personnel connect with their business personnel, because Fokker illustrates plainly that the consequences of non-compliance may be much greater than mere dollar values.  Even assuming the penalty amount sticks, not only was the $21 million penalty roughly equal to the gross revenues for the violative shipments, but the Justice Department described the investigation conducted by outside counsel as "vast;" OFAC described it as "exhaustive."  Thorough internal investigations can wreak havoc on a company's day-to-day operations (not to mention cost a lot).  Prevention is always better than cure.

It is imperative to have a compliance program with clear and efficient processes that allow the business side to manage their own and their customers' expectations, and set real boundaries for results.  Anything less can lead, as Fokker learned, to very significant, negative consequences.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
31 Jan 2019, Other, Los Angeles, United States

Invites you to join us for a private cooking class hosted by Parties that Cook!

31 Jan 2019, Conference, Los Angeles, United States

The Southern California Association of Corporate Counsel's In-House Counsel Conference

6 Feb 2019, Other, Los Angeles, United States

Please join Sheppard Mullin for cocktails & hors d'oeuvres during The Wind Power Finance & Investment Summit 2019

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions