United States: Encryption Flaw "Heartbleed" Creates Data Risk: How Insurance Can Stanch the Bleeding

Last Updated: July 17 2014
Article by Richard Gallena

In early April, news broke of an encryption flaw named "Heartbleed" that exposed companies to data breaches for over two-and-one-half years. Heartbleed is a vulnerability in OpenSSL, an open-source set of libraries for encrypting online services that nearly two-thirds of all websites use. The vulnerability allows hackers to steal personal information, such as bank account information, social security numbers and passwords, from companies, with little risk of detection. Given the length of exposure and the ease of exploitation, Heartbleed has been described by cybersecurity professionals as one of the biggest flaws in Internet history. And the technology community has not been able to stop the bleeding. In June, researchers found additional vulnerabilities in OpenSSL that implicate many of the same data breach concerns triggered by Heartbleed.

While the ability to escape detection makes the extent to which hackers have exploited these vulnerabilities unclear, for many companies, costs and future liabilities related to Heartbleed may be very substantial. Insurance policies may be available to help stem the hemorrhaging of financial losses and liabilities. This article discusses the rise in cybersecurity attacks and examines first- and third-party coverage potentially available under different types of insurance policies. It then describes state security breach notification laws that may be triggered by events like Heartbleed, and recent SEC guidance on disclosing cyber risks in public filings.


Over the past year, the business and legal communities have witnessed a marked rise in cyber-attacks. The Federal Trade Commission continues to list identity theft as the number one complaint among consumers in the United States.1 And consumers have good reason to be concerned. A recent study revealed that over the past 12 months, hackers have exposed the personal information of roughly one half of American adults. The Ponemon Institute also conducted an annual cyber-crime study based on a representative sample of 60 organizations among various industry sectors. According to the 2013 study, the number of successful attacks rose 18 percent between 2012 and 2013, while the costs associated with cyber-crime rose 26 percent. Yet despite this surge, as of 2013, only 31 percent of companies had purchased some form of cyber-risk insurance. While virtually all companies that collect personal information or otherwise sensitive data are at risk for cyber-attacks, the financial services industry, defense industry, retail industry and health care industry are especially prone to this threat. Given the rapidly evolving nature of cyber threats, it is vital for companies to understand what types of costs may be covered under their insurance policies, their risk of exposure, and the legal implications of events like Heartbleed.


Cyber-risk insurance policies may provide coverage for costs incurred in response to Heartbleed, as well as for the defense and indemnification costs stemming from government investigations and consumer lawsuits. Like traditional forms of insurance, cyber-risk policies can generally be divided into first-party coverage and third-party coverage.2 First-party policies cover costs that the policyholder incurs in response to an event like a cyber-attack. Under third-party policies, insurers indemnify the policyholder and provide defense costs in the event the policyholder is sued or subject to a government investigation stemming from a covered event or occurrence.

A. First-Party Coverage for Business Expenses Stemming from Heartbleed

Coverage under a first-party cyber policy will depend on the circumstances of the loss and the language of the policy at issue. But it seems likely that Heartbleed constitutes a covered event under many first-party cyber policies. For example, AIG's CyberEdge® Event Management Insurance provides coverage for "all loss that an Insured incurs solely as a result of an alleged Security Failure or Privacy Event that has actually occurred or is reasonably believed by such Insured to have occurred." CyberEdge® Event Management Insurance, AIG, 115420 (6/13) (emphasis added). This "reasonable belief" language extends coverage even if a company does not know conclusively whether information was actually exposed or wrongfully acquired, such as in the case of Heartbleed.

Under the policy, "Privacy Event" is defined as "any failure to protect Confidential Information . . . including, without limitation, that which results in an identity theft or other wrongful emulation of the identity of an individual or corporation." By this definition, Heartbleed likely should constitute a Privacy Event because it is an encryption flaw that results in a failure to protect confidential information.

"Security Failure" is defined as "a failure or violation of the security of a Computer System, including, without limitation, that which results in or fails to mitigate any unauthorized access[.]" Heartbleed also likely constitutes a Security Failure because it is a computer system flaw that causes a failure to mitigate unauthorized access by third parties. Thus, by either definition, the policy should provide coverage for losses incurred in response to Heartbleed.

Once a covered event like Heartbleed occurs, a company must determine what types of costs are covered. Cyber-risk insurance policies often provide first-party coverage for a wide range of expenses that companies incur in response to cyber threats like Heartbleed, including costs to improve a company's image and notify consumers of a potential breach. For example, the Zurich Security and Privacy Protection Policy covers a company's costs incurred in retaining a third party to:

  1. conduct a computer forensic analysis to investigate the Company's Computer System to determine the cause and extent of such Privacy Event;
  2. determine indemnification obligations under any written contract with respect to a Wrongful Act by a Service Provider in connection with such Privacy Event;
  3. determine whether the Company is obligated to notify affected individuals or applicable regulatory agencies of such Privacy Event;
  4. effect compliance with any Privacy Regulation under the applicable Policy Regulation most favorable to the Company's affected individuals;
  5. notify the Company's affected individuals or applicable regulatory agencies of such Privacy Event and establish new account numbers for the Company's affected individuals;
  6. plan, implement, execute and manage a public relations campaign to counter or minimize any actual or anticipated adverse effects of negative publicity from such Privacy Event or to protect or restore the Company's business reputation in response to negative publicity following such Privacy Event; or
  7. procure credit monitoring services for the Company's affected individuals in responding to such Privacy Event.

Zurich Security and Privacy Protection Policy, Zurich, U-SPR-1000-B CW (7/09).

Under the provisions above, hiring security experts, consultants, public relations companies and law firms to perform any of these activities should be covered. The period during which such response costs are covered varies by policy. In the case of the Zurich policy, coverage is provided for 12 months following the event. The policy also allows companies to take additional action to protect and restore their reputations, notify customers of their potential exposure, and provide credit monitoring services that many states require following a breach. Breach notification can cost millions of dollars—but it may be required under state data breach laws and also serves to mitigate the risk of additional lawsuits. See Part III, infra. While cyber policies are becoming more restrictive, notice costs should be covered under most forms now in use.

Some cyber-risk policies also provide coverage for lost income as the result of the suspension or interruption of computer systems. Under these policies, for example, an online retailer that has to suspend commerce in response to a security breach could seek coverage for its lost revenue. The terms and limits vary widely, but this can be valuable coverage—particularly if business interruption coverage is not available under traditional commercial property policies.

B. Third-Party Coverage for Liabilities Stemming from Heartbleed

Many insurance companies offer specialized cyber-risk policies that provide third-party coverage to policyholders burdened by defense costs and liabilities stemming from threats like Heartbleed. These potential costs include, but are not limited to, defense and indemnity expenses incurred as a result of claims made by consumers or users whose private information was compromised, and costs incurred to respond to regulatory investigations and proceedings.

There is very little standardization of policy terms and conditions in cyber risk policies thus far, which means that cyber-security policies can differ widely from one another in the coverage they provide. For example, the Zurich Security and Privacy Protection Policy discussed above provides coverage for "all Loss which the Insured becomes legally obligated to pay on account of any Claim first made against the Insured . . . for a Wrongful Act . . . ." A "Claim" includes written demands for monetary or injunctive relief, civil proceedings against the insured, and arbitration or other alternative dispute resolution proceedings against the insured. The Zurich policy defines a "Wrongful Act" as "any actual or alleged act, error, omission, neglect or breach of duty by an Insured" as well as "any actual or alleged act, error, omission, neglect or breach of duty . . . which causes a breach of the Company's Network Security that results in . . . the Unauthorized Access to or Unauthorized Use of the Company's Computer System . . . ." This language should be broad enough to encompass claims for privacy injuries that consumers may bring against companies if they discover that their private information was "hacked."3

The Zurich policy also provides that the insurer will reimburse the policyholder for all "Defense Expenses the Insured incurs in responding to any Regulatory Proceeding . . . concerning a Privacy Event or Security Wrongful Act." The policy defines "Regulatory Proceeding" as "a formal investigation of an Insured by an administrative or regulatory agency or similar governmental body concerning a Privacy Event" or "an administrative adjudicative proceeding against an Insured by an administrative or regulatory agency or similar governmental body . . . ." One example of a covered "Regulatory Proceeding" would be an investigation by a state attorney general—and in the past few years, several multi-state AG task forces have been formed to investigate major data breaches. Cyber policies should provide coverage for defense costs incurred to respond to such inquiries.


Heartbleed may trigger security breach notification laws in many states, and companies should consider whether this threat gives rise to notification requirements in the states in which they do business. Nearly all states now require companies to notify consumers of a data breach. While each law is different, most states require companies to notify consumers following the unauthorized acquisition of personal information. But the specific requirements vary from state to state, and this patchwork of laws creates enormous headaches for financial institutions, online retailers, and other companies that conduct online business across the country. The same data breach may trigger notice requirements in some states, but not in others. To compound matters, the statutory rules in many states are less than clear. Best practices dictate that a company should determine the states in which customers have been affected and then carefully assess whether notification is required under the laws of those states.

Rather than wrestle with these uncertainties—and risk penalties for non-compliance—some companies have opted to give notice to all customers, even in jurisdictions where notice is not arguably required. This may be a prudent course, but it is important for the company to review its insurance policies and consult with its insurers. Some cyber policies will pay for the cost of notification only in jurisdictions where it is legally required, while other policies require advance consent from the insurer.


The SEC has also taken notice of the risks associated with data breaches. In March 2014, the SEC hosted a roundtable during which Mary Jo White, the agency's chairwoman, described cyber threats as "of extraordinary and long-term seriousness . . . even surpassing terrorism." In 2011, the SEC issued enhanced disclosure guidance to assist companies in determining whether to disclose cybersecurity risks and attacks to shareholders in public filings. The SEC noted that companies that fall victim to successful cyber-attacks may incur a variety of costs that affect the financial condition of a company, including:

  • Remediation costs that may include liability for stolen assets or information and repairing system damage that may have been caused. Remediation costs may also include incentives offered to customers or other business partners in an effort to maintain the business relationships after an attack;
  • Increased cybersecurity protection costs that may include organizational changes, deploying additional personnel and protection technologies, training employees, and engaging third-party experts and consultants;
  • Lost revenues resulting from unauthorized use of proprietary information or the failure to retain or attract customers following an attack;
  • Litigation; and
  • Reputational damage adversely affecting customer or investor confidence.

The SEC therefore recommended that companies consider disclosing such factors as the nature of material cyber-security risks that the company faces, the potential costs of a cyber-security breach, and a description of relevant insurance coverage. When determining whether Heartbleed and related cyber-security issues implicate SEC disclosure requirements, companies should evaluate the risk that a data breach poses to their business, and balance the probability that a data breach has or will occur with the magnitude of harm that such a breach could cause.

The Target data breach illustrates the devastating effects a data breach can have on a company. Following the breach during the 2013 holiday buying season, Target's fourth-quarter profits fell 46 percent.4 By February 2014, the company incurred $61 million in costs associated with the breach, including the cost of providing credit monitoring services to the nearly 110 million customers affected. These costs do not include Target's potential liability to consumers and potential regulatory fines and penalties. As evidenced by the increased attention from the SEC and the fallout following the Target breach, publicly traded companies can no longer afford to ignore the risks posed by cybersecurity threats.


This article does not purport to discuss every issue that a data breach may raise. In addition to the aforementioned issues, a data breach may implicate a company's contractual obligations to financial institutions and consumers, as well as compliance requirements under industry-specific regulations. Under contractual agreements related to credit card processing, a company may be required to hire a forensic investigator to perform an audit and pay financial penalties for failing to comply with Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards ("PCI DDS"). These "card-brand" agreements may also require companies to indemnify consumers for fraudulent charges. Some cyber policies cover the cost of defending card brand claims as well as any penalties or assessments imposed. But these coverage provisions are complicated and are not included in every cyber policy. In addition to the aforementioned issues, a data breach may implicate a company's contractual obligations to financial institutions and consumers, as well as compliance requirements under industry-specific regulations.5


The extent to which Heartbleed was exploited to access confidential information is still unclear. What is clear, however, is that data breaches and cyber-attacks are becoming increasingly common across all industries. Companies can mitigate their risk of a cyber-attack by taking proactive measures to protect against breaches and by enhancing the coverage available under their cyber policies.


1. FTC Announces Top National Consumer Complaints for 2013, FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION (February 27, 2014) available at http://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2014/02/ftc-announces-top-national-consumer-complaints-2013.

2. This article does not address coverage for data breaches under traditional insurance policies. However, many types of traditional policies—including CGL, D&O, Property and Business Interruption, and Crime—may provide coverage for data breaches that result in the disclosure of personal information. A security breach due to Heartbleed may go undetected for some time, so companies affected should assess coverage under policies in place when the breach occurred, as well as under current policies.

3. One example of such a case is Anderson v. Hannaford Brothers Co., 659 F.3d 151 (1st Cir. 2011) in which customers of Hannaford grocery stores filed a class action suit after hackers breached the electronic payment processing system of the grocery chain, stealing up to 4.2 million credit- and debit-card numbers, expiration dates and security codes.

4. See Amrita Jayakumar, Data breach hits Target's profits, but that's only the tip of the iceberg, THE WASHINGTON POST (Feb. 26, 2014) available at http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/data-breach-hits-targets-profits-but-thats-only-the-tip-of-the-iceberg/2014/02/26/159f6846-9d60-11e3-9ba6-800d1192d08b_story.html.

5. For example, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ("HIPAA") requires "covered entities" to notify affected individuals if their protected health information has been, or is reasonably believed to have been, accessed, acquired, used, or disclosed as a result of a data breach. 42 C.F.R. § 164.404(a) (2009). Guidelines issued under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act impose similar requirements on financial institutions.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Richard Gallena
Events from this Firm
23 Jan 2019, Speaking Engagement, New York, United States

New York partner Rich Martinelli will be a featured panelist during the Society of Physician Engineers' event, "Intellectual Property Law & Tax Credits for Life Science Companies."

29 Jan 2019, Speaking Engagement, New York, United States

Please join Orrick partner Jay Jurata at this year's Joint NGMN and ITU Conference on January 29-30 in Geneva, Switzerland.

27 Feb 2019, Conference, Las Vegas, United States

Partner John Narducci will be discussing The Impact of the Tax Reform Act on Valuations at ABI’s Valcon 2019 Conference.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Smith Gambrell & Russell LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Smith Gambrell & Russell LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions