United States: An Update On Subject Matter Eligibility In The United States

The past three months have been a busy period for those following the U.S. patent eligibility law. Recent examination guidance published by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) may affect patent applications with composition or method claims in a variety of chemical, materials science, and biological arts.  The Federal Circuit's recent decision in In re Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), No. 2013-1407 (Fed. Cir. May 8, 2014), also provides information about how the U.S. courts may consider patent eligibility of composition claims in the wake of recent U.S. Supreme Court case law.  We provide an update of recent events to help practitioners keep an eye on this unsettled area of law.  A more detailed article on the USPTO Guidance is also included in this edition of Full Disclosure.

As readers of Full Disclosure may recall, in 2012 and 2013 the U.S. Supreme Court issued two key decisions concerning patent eligibility.  In Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., 566 U.S. ___, 132 S. Ct. 1289 (2012), the Court held that a correlation between the concentration of a biomarker in a patient and the efficacy of a drug treatment was a law of nature.  The Court concluded that, while an application of such a law of nature may be patent eligible, the claim-at-issue was, in effect, drawn to the correlation itself and was not patent eligible.  Id.  In Ass'n for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., 569 U.S. ___, 133 S. Ct. 2107 (2013), the Court addressed the patent eligibility of composition claims drawn to certain isolated genomic DNA and cDNA segments. The Court held that the claims drawn to isolated genomic DNAs were not patent eligible because the claimed sequences were the same as the naturally occurring gene sequences.  Id.  But the Court found the claims drawn to cDNAs patent eligible because the claimed cDNA sequences differed from the naturally occurring gene sequences due to the removal of introns.  Id.

On March 4, 2014, the USPTO published new guidance for examination of the subject matter eligibility of product and process claims in view of the Mayo and Myriad cases.  The document is entitled Guidance For Determining Subject Matter Eligibility Of Claims Reciting Or Involving Laws of Nature, Natural Phenomena, & Natural Products ("Guidance"), and is available at http://www.uspto.gov/patents/law/exam/myriad-mayo_guidance.pdf.  The March 2014 Guidance is for use in subject matter eligibility determinations of all claims reciting or involving laws of nature, natural principles, natural phenomena, and/or natural products, which the Guidance collectively terms "judicial exceptions" to patentability.  Guidance at 1-2.  The USPTO also noted that earlier guidance concerning claims reciting abstract ideas remains unchanged by the March 4 Guidance.  Id. at 1.

In particular, while the Myriad decision concerned certain isolated DNA segments, the USPTO noted that its Guidance applies to claims that recite or involve a variety of natural products.  Id. at 3. Examples may include "chemicals derived from natural sources (e.g., antibiotics, fats, oils, petroleum derivatives, resins, toxins, etc.); foods (e.g., fruits, grains, meats and vegetables); metals and metallic compounds that exist in nature; minerals; natural materials (e.g., rocks, sands, soils); nucleic acids; organisms (e.g., bacteria, plants and multicellular animals); proteins and peptides; and other substances found in or derived from nature."  Id.

According to the Guidance, if a claim involves, or may involve, a so-called "judicial exception" to patentability, such as a law of nature, a natural phenomenon, or a natural product, the claim is patent eligible if "the claim as a whole is significantly different than the judicial exception(s)."  Id.  The Guidance provides a multifactor analytical framework designed to assist examiners in answering whether the claim recites something "significantly different" than a judicial exception.  Id. at 3-5.  If the claim is drawn to a product or composition, the factors assess whether there are sufficient structural differences between the claimed product and a natural product to render the claimed product "markedly different" from the natural product.  In the case of method claims, the factors are aimed at, for example, determining whether the claim elements or steps impose limits on claim scope, provide specific instructions on how to apply or use the judicial exception(s), or add features that are more than well understood, conventional, or routine in the relevant field of study.  Id.  The Guidance then notes that "if the totality of the relevant factors weigh[s] toward eligibility, the claim qualifies as eligible subject matter," but "[i]f the totality of the relevant factors weighs against eligibility, [then] the claim should be rejected."  Id. at 4.

The Guidance provides a handful of examples to illustrate the analysis, one of which includes a hypothetical claim to a "[p]urified amazonic acid," a chemical isolated from the leaves of a tree found in the Amazon rainforest and known to have therapeutic effects for treating breast cancer.  Id. at 7, Example B, claim 1.  That claim is concluded to be ineligible for patenting because the amazonic acid is structurally identical to the amazonic acid found in leaves and the claim does not provide other distinguishing features.  Id.  In contrast, a hypothetical claim to a "[p]urified 5-methyl amazonic acid," a derivative created in the laboratory with additional therapeutic functions, is considered patent eligible, because the claimed compound is "markedly different [in structure]" from what exists in nature.&td  Id. at 7-8, Example B, claim 2.

If the claim to the purified amazonic acid is considered ineligible for patenting, what about methods of using that compound?  The USPTO considers a hypothetical claim to "[a] method of treating colon cancer, comprising: administering a daily dose of purified amazonic acid to a patient suffering from colon cancer for a period of time from 10 days to 20 days . . . [at a daily dose of] about 0.75 to about 1.25 teaspoons of amazonic acid" to be patent eligible, because the claim as a whole recites something "significantly different" than the natural product by adding specific limitations as to the patient population (colon cancer, not breast cancer), administration schedule, treatment duration, and dosage.  Id. at 7-9, Example B, claim 3.  The Guidance does not consider a simpler method claim drawn to amazonic acid in colon cancer that omits the treatment schedule and/or dosage range limitations, however.  Indeed, the example claims of the Guidance as a whole tend to be either relatively broad or relatively narrow in scope, which leaves uncertainty about how the USPTO will evaluate claims with a scope in between these extremes.

Two weeks after publication of the Guidance, on March 19, 2014, the USPTO published a set of slides used in its examiner training program on patent eligibility, entitled Evaluating Subject Matter Eligibility Under 35 USC § 101: March 2014 Update.  The slides are available at http://www.uspto.gov/patents/law/exam/myriad-mayo_slides_20140319.pdf.  Practitioners should review the slides as well as the Guidance because the slides provide additional instructions to examiners beyond what is included in the Guidance, as well as additional claim examples.  On April 16, 2014, the USPTO held a public presentation with a further slide presentation intended in part to clarify some of the thinking behind a few of the example claims in the Guidance.  This presentation may be downloaded at http://www.uspto.gov/patents/announce/myriad-mayo_bcp_20140416.pdf.

Then, on May 9, 2014, the USPTO held a public forum at which several organizations and individual practitioners provided their views of the USPTO's Guidance.  Presentations from that meeting may be downloaded at http://www.uspto.gov/patents/announce/myriad-mayo.jsp. The USPTO is also currently accepting comments from the public on the Guidance.  Comments may be submitted until June 30, 2014, on-line at the above web address.  Whether public comments will influence the USPTO to change any aspects of the Guidance and, if so, how, remains unclear at present.

It is important to note that the USPTO Guidance reflects the USPTO's analysis of the Supreme Court case precedent, and is not binding on U.S. courts.  It remains to be seen whether courts will agree with the USPTO's position.  Only when the U.S. courts hear further cases concerning patent eligibility, including cases stemming from appeals of USPTO claim rejections, will it become clear whether the U.S. courts agree with the USPTO's interpretation of Mayo and Myriad.  This could take several years. In the meantime, however, patent applicants in the chemical and biopharmaceutical industries have to grapple with the new examination strategy of the USPTO.  Thus, applicants should consider adapting claim drafting and disclosure strategies for new U.S. patent applications to meet the requirements for patent eligibility outlined in the new USPTO Guidance.  In addition, applicants may also review relevant claims in pending U.S. patent applications and take appropriate action to amend claims as necessary.

While it may take some time for courts to substantially weigh in on the patent eligibility debate, on May 8, 2014, one day before one of the USPTO's public forums on the Guidance, the Federal Circuit issued a decision regarding the patent eligibility of the Roslin Institute's claims drawn to certain cloned mammals.  In re Roslin Institute, No. 2013-1407 (Fed. Cir. May 8, 2014).  The Roslin Institute is the creator of Dolly the Sheep—the first mammal ever cloned from an adult somatic cell.  Id., slip op. at 2.  The Roslin Institute's claims recited, inter alia, a "live-born clone of a pre-existing, non-embryonic, donor mammal, wherein the mammal is selected from cattle, sheep, pigs, and goats."  Id. at 3 (citation omitted).  The court considered the claimed clones to be "exact genetic copies of patent ineligible subject matter" and "[a]ccordingly . . . not eligible for patent protection."  Id. at 8.  The court further noted that, while the Roslin Institute argued that there were environmental factors leading to phenotypic differences between its clones and their donor mammals, and that there were also differences in the mitochondrial DNA of the cloned mammals, those differences were not expressed in the claims.  Id. at 9-10.  According to the court, "[The Roslin Institute's] claims do not describe clones that have markedly different characteristics from the donor animals of which they are copies."  Id. at 11.  In view of this decision, as well as the USPTO Guidance, when drafting composition claims, patent applicants should consider ensuring that their specifications include a basis to add limitations to the claims that illustrate structural differences between the claimed subject matter and any natural products from which the claimed subject matter is derived.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
27 Nov 2017, Seminar, London, UK

Finnegan partner Anthony Tridico will present “U.S. Patent Case Law Update” at the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys’ annual Patent Case Law Review.

28 Nov 2017, Seminar, Milan, Italy

Finnegan partner John Paul will present “Internet of Things: Patent Liability, Enforcement and Licensing” and will join the Mock WIPO Mediation at International Technology Transfer—Licensing and ADR, co-hosted by Licensing Executives Society and World Intellectual Property Organization.

29 Nov 2017, Seminar, Tel Aviv, Israel

Finnegan is a platinum sponsor IVC Research Center’s start-up forum, “The Most Promising Start Ups for 2017 – A Synergy of Big Data, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Vision and IoT.”

 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Emails

From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.