USPTO Issues Preliminary Examination Instructions In Light Of Alice Corp.

SM
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

Contributor

Sheppard Mullin is a full service Global 100 firm with over 1,000 attorneys in 16 offices located in the United States, Europe and Asia. Since 1927, companies have turned to Sheppard Mullin to handle corporate and technology matters, high stakes litigation and complex financial transactions. In the US, the firm’s clients include more than half of the Fortune 100.
The Supreme Court unanimously held that the subject patent claims are not patent-eligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101.
United States Intellectual Property

In Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International, el al., Case No. 13-298 (decided June 19, 2014)  ("Alice Corp."), the Supreme Court unanimously held that the subject patent claims are not patent-eligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101.  The patents at issue are directed toward a process for mitigating "settlement risk," i.e., for financial exchange transactions, in which a computer system is used as an intermediary between the parties to the transaction.  The patent claims include a method for exchanging financial obligations, a computer system configured to carry out the method, and a computer-program-product claim covering the same process.  The Court held that "the claims at issue are drawn to the abstract idea of intermediated settlement, and that merely requiring generic computer implementation fails to transform that abstract idea into a patent-eligible invention."  Alice Corp., slip op. at 1.

In light of this decision, the United States Patent and Trademark Office published Preliminary Examination Instructions to guide the Examining Corps in weighing the subject matter eligibility of claims involving abstract ideas, and particularly computer-implemented abstract ideas, under 35 U.S.C. § 101.  A copy of  the Preliminary Examination Instructions can be found here.  The Office will accept public comments regarding Alice and these guidelines until July 31, 2014.  As these guidelines are preliminary, we expect that the Office will continue to consider the subject matter and issue further guidance after receiving public feedback.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More