United States: Supreme Court Rejects "Presumption Of Prudence" In ESOP Cases

On June 25, 2014, the Supreme Court issued a decision in Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer1 regarding the availability of relief against fiduciaries of an employee stock ownership plan ("ESOP") for alleged breaches of the fiduciary duty of prudence in investing in employer stock.

The Court held that ESOP fiduciaries are not entitled to a special "presumption of prudence" when their decision to buy or hold employer stock is challenged in court. This is a departure from the previous trend among federal appellate courts -- including in the Second Circuit -- which had applied a fiduciary-friendly presumption of prudence in employee stock-drop cases brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"). To overcome the presumption, plaintiffs were required to show that fiduciaries knew or should have known that the employer faced dire circumstances and was on the brink of collapse. Under the Supreme Court's Fifth Third Bancorp ruling, ESOP fiduciaries are now held to the same duty of prudence as are general ERISA fiduciaries, except that, in accordance with statute, no diversification requirement exists with respect to an ESOP's accumulation of employer stock.


Defendant Fifth Third Bancorp ("FTB") maintained a defined-contribution retirement savings plan for its employees, which included as one option a company stock fund meeting the requirements to be treated as an ESOP.

Former FTB employees and ESOP participants, plaintiffs claimed that retirement plan fiduciaries breached the duty of prudence imposed by Section 404(a)(1)(B) of ERISA,2 by maintaining the ESOP's holdings of company stock. Specifically, they alleged that FTB knew or should have known, through publicly available information and inside nonpublic information, that FTB stock was overvalued and therefore risky. Plaintiffs suggested several supposedly prudent courses of action for FTB to have pursued: these included divesting the ESOP of FTB stock, refraining from purchasing any more FTB stock, removing the ESOP option, or publicly disclosing negative information to allow for market correction of the allegedly overpriced stock.

The trial court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, holding that the allegations did not overcome a presumption that the plan fiduciaries' decision to invest in employer stock was prudent. The Sixth Circuit reversed, agreeing that ESOP fiduciaries are entitled to a presumption of prudence, but holding that the presumption is an evidentiary one and that it does not apply at the pleading stage.

The Supreme Court unanimously vacated the Sixth Circuit's decision. Contrary to a bevy of lower courts, the Court held that no presumption of prudence exists for ESOP fiduciaries at any stage of litigation. The Court's conclusion followed from the pertinent provisions of ERISA – e.g., Section 404(a)(1)(B),3 which imposes a "prudent person" standard upon all ERISA fiduciary decisions, and Section 404(a)(2),4 which modifies those duties in the ESOP context by providing that an ESOP fiduciary is exempt from the duty of prudence with respect to employer stock "only to the extent that it requires diversification."

The Court emphasized that these provisions make no reference to a special presumption for ESOP fiduciaries, and do not require plan beneficiaries to allege that an employer was on the "brink of collapse" or facing "extraordinary circumstances" to state a claim for breach of the duty of prudence. Nor does the requirement in Section 404(a)(1)(D)5 to manage a plan "in accordance with the documents and instruments governing the plan insofar as such documents and instruments are consistent with" ERISA provide any basis to presume that ESOP fiduciaries were prudent in continuing to invest in or failing to divest company stock. Rather, according to the Court, "[t]his provision makes clear that the duty of prudence trumps the instructions of a plan document, such as an instruction to invest exclusively in employer stock."

Cognizant of a need to weed out non-meritorious and burdensome claims of corporate fiduciary malfeasance, the Court urged lower courts to engage in "careful, context-sensitive scrutiny" of allegations at the motion-to-dismiss stage. For example, ESOP fiduciaries are entitled to rely on market prices. The Court reasoned that "where a stock is publicly traded, allegations that a fiduciary should have recognized from publicly available information alone that the market was over- or undervaluing the stock are implausible as a general rule, at least in the absence of special circumstances." Without more, such claims should fail.

At the same time, aware that plan fiduciaries may face seemingly conflicting demands, the Court offered particular guidance to courts in assessing circumstances potentially implicating fiduciaries' access to inside information. First, ERISA does not require fiduciaries to break the law, such as by selling company stock on the basis of non-public information. Second, courts ought to consider how discharging the ERISA duty of prudence might interact with company insiders' obligations under the law, including the federal securities laws. Third, the mere act of selling or refusing to purchase company stock by insiders, evincing a lack of faith in the company's prospects, might itself send a negative signal and potential shockwave through the market, doing more harm than good to the fund by causing a steeper drop in stock price or value than might otherwise occur.

Likely Effects of the Decision

The Supreme Court has removed a substantial hurdle previously faced by plan beneficiaries seeking to challenge the actions of ESOP fiduciaries in maintaining or increasing holdings in employer stock. Gone are the days of plaintiffs needing to show that a company was on the brink of collapse or suffering a huge stock price decline amidst other dire circumstances to make out a claim of fiduciary imprudence.

On the other hand, the Court's decision is laden with caveats regarding the close scrutiny that should be undertaken by courts in evaluating employer stock-drop complaints and also regarding the seeming lack of alternatives available to plan fiduciaries allegedly in possession of inside information that might negatively affect the price of company stock. The Court goes so far as to suggest guidelines for the lower courts to consider at the motion to dismiss stage. If claims based on publicly available information will routinely fail as a matter of law, and claims based on inside information will not be viable as a matter of practice, then the Court's decision in Fifth Third Bancorp may undermine the viability of many of these cases.


1 No. 12-751, 573 U.S. __.

2 29 U.S.C. § 1104(a)(1)(B).

3 Id.

4 29 U.S.C. § 1104(a)(2).

5 29 U.S.C. § 1104(a)(1)(D).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions