Big Win For Employers: NJ Supreme Court Affirms Limits On Employee Whistleblower Actions

SH
Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP

Contributor

Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP logo
Schnader is a full-service law firm of 160 attorneys with offices in Pennsylvania, New York, California, Washington, D.C., New Jersey, Delaware and an affiliation with a law firm in Jakarta. We provide businesses, government entities, and nonprofit organizations throughout the world with innovative, practical, and cost-effective solutions to their business and litigation needs. We also provide wealth management and an array of personal legal services to individuals.
Employers benefit from a decision that a former employee cannot maintain a whistleblower claim absent a reasonable belief that the employer violated a law or regulation.
United States Employment and HR

Employers benefit from a New Jersey Supreme Court decision finding that a former employee cannot maintain a whistleblower claim absent a reasonable belief that the employer violated a law, rule, or regulation. Such claims must minimally identify the specific authority for the alleged violation.

Under New Jersey's Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA), a licensed health care professional may assert a whistleblower claim against his employer if he possesses a "reasonable belief that the employer's conduct 'constitutes improper quality of patient care.'"  In Hitesman v. Bridgeway, Inc. d/b/a Bridgeway Care Center, a nurse claimed wrongful termination based on allegations that he was a whistleblower regarding his employer's improper quality of patient care.  To establish his claim, the nurse relied on: (1) a code of ethics that applied to him as a nurse but not his employer, and (2) nursing home internal policy documents that did not define acceptable patient care.  The Court ruled that such a claim cannot be maintained when it does not establish a violation of the law or the employer's standard of conduct.

The Supreme Court affirmed last year's decision by the N.J. Appellate Division, which was discussed in detail here.

The scope of whistleblower protection continues to be a hot issue in the New Jersey courts.  Check out our blog for further guidance on the courts' interpretation of New Jersey's whistleblower statute.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More