United States: Navigating The Murky Waters Of Best Interests With A Transgender Child

Dr. Diane Ehrensaft, child psychologist and author of the acclaimed book "One Pill Makes You Boy, One Pill Makes You Girl," describes "a growing cohort of children who, at ages as young as three or four, announce they do not accept...the gender assigned to them at birth." Similarly, a leading expert on medical treatments for childhood/adolescent gender dysphoria at Harvard Medical School, Dr. Norman Spack, describes that his patients, as young as eight years old, "have been digging in their heels for five years or longer about their gender identity and gender role."

According to the "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders" (DSM-5), gender dysphoria, previously classified as gender identity disorder of childhood (GIDC), is characterized by a marked difference between the individual's expressed gender and the gender assigned to him or her at birth. Gender dysphoria is manifested in children in a number of ways, including strong desires to be treated as the other gender or to be rid of the characteristics of the child's birth sex. The child may also embrace a strong conviction that he or she has feelings and reactions typical of the other gender.

While there is no reliable data as to the frequency of gender dysphoria due to the subjective diagnostic criteria, as well as children suppressing their cross-gender identification into adulthood, experts estimate that at least one in 500 children exhibit gender dysphoric behaviors. And with gender issues increasingly gaining public attention, the visibility of these children will no doubt increase in the years to come.

Still, with little precedent and a generally binary understanding of gender, the legal profession has yet to catch up with the shifting tides. Judges and lawyers alike oftentimes lack experience with issues related to gender and children. That lack of understanding can have serious consequences for the transgender and gender-nonconforming youth.

Without the proper support, caregiving and structures, transgender youth can develop an increased risk of clinically significant distress, anxiety, increased risk of suicide or impairment in social, occupational or other important areas of functioning in children. A 2009 study conducted by Dr. Caitlyn Ryan found that these risk factors are directly linked to the level of family rejection of a child's gender nonconformity, rather than to anything inherent in nonconformity itself. In drawing that causal connection, the study controlled for the effects of other factors, including social pressure a child may experience to conform to gender stereotypes. She and others, including Dr. Ehrensaft and Dr. Spack, advocate for a "supportive approach" or "gender affirmative" model that focuses on providing the gender nonconforming child with support and acceptance as a means of reducing internal psychological stress.

By contrast, some parents may attempt to change their child's gender identity through so-called "conversion" therapy: treatment aimed at trying to change a child's gender identity and lived gender expression to become more harmonious with sex assigned at birth. The World Professional Association for Transgender Health has outwardly condemned this type of treatment, and it has similarly been rejected by every major medical and mental health organization in the United States as ineffective and harmful.

Multiple jurisdictions, including New Jersey, are beginning to restrict the use of conversion therapies on minors. N.J.S.A.§§ 45:1-54, -55; King v. Christie, No. 13-5038, 2013 WL 5970343 (D.N.J. Nov. 8, 2013) (upholding constitutionality of New Jersey's ban for minors); Pickup v. Brown, 728 F.3d 1042 (9th Cir. 2013) (upholding constitutionality of California's ban for minors).

As families grapple with the proper course of treatment for a gender-nonconforming child, one of the most challenging aspects can relate to the legal roadblocks they may encounter. The federal constitution strongly protects parents' right to make decisions on behalf of their children, which will not be disturbed absent a compelling state interest. See Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 215 (1972).

However, when parents are divorced and disagree as to the course of treatment that is in the best interests of the child, the courts must intervene under the principles of parens patrie, even without a compelling state interest. S. v. A., 118 N.J.Super. 69, 70 (Ch. Div. 1972), (citing 4Pomeroy's Equity Jurisprudence, §??1304 (1941 Ed.)).

Nearly all states utilize the "best interest of the child" standard in disputed custody cases—a standard that necessarily involves the judge's subjective beliefs about what is best. While legislation, scholarly articles and case law abound with regulation of transgendered parents' right to custody under the best interest standard, there are no New Jersey cases, and in fact, few cases nationwide that bear upon the best interests of a transgender child.

However, when litigating a contested custody case in New Jersey involving a dispute as to the treatment of transgender children, practitioners should take note of two decisions wherein the court modified custody to award medical decision-making power to the unsupportive parent: Smith v. Smith, No. 01-DR-86 (Common Pleas Ct. of Jefferson Cnty., Ohio, Sept. 4, 2004, and Williams v. Frymire, No. 2011-CA-001568-ME (Ky Court of Appeals).

The Ohio case, Smith, revolved around the parties' child, then 10 years old, who had expressed from a very early age a desire to be treated as a girl. Upon the parents' divorce, the mother was awarded custody. While the child was in her care, she supported the child's decision to live as a girl; she allowed the child to wear girl's clothing, go by the name Christine, participate in transgender support groups and generally be treated as a girl.

Several years following the divorce, the father petitioned the court for a change in custody after the mother enrolled the child in school as female without his consent. In an omission that later appeared almost fatal to her case, the mother further failed to obtain a diagnosis of GIDC (now gender dysphoria) prior to undertaking significant decisions relating to the child.

The court entered a temporary order directing the mother to immediately stop allowing the child to wear girl's clothing, to stop referring to the child by the name Christine, to stop using female pronouns and to stop talking privately with the child about the child's female gender feelings.

A lengthy custody dispute followed. At one point between hearings, the father discovered that the mother had violated the court order by allowing the child to wear a girl's swimsuit and was witnessed referring to the child by a female name when speaking with another parent of a transgender child.

During the proceedings, five expert witnesses testified during a custody hearing, two on behalf of the mother, two on behalf of the father and one court-appointed psychologist. Both parents acknowledged that the child wanted to live as a girl and wanted to remain with the mother. The child corroborated these statements in an in camera interview with the judge.

As to the child's in camera testimony, the judge acknowledged that the child relayed a desire to live as a girl. However, the judge rejected the child's statements because he believed the child's gestures were not feminine, because the child did not mention being attracted to boys, and because the child "enjoy[s] a number of stereotypical male activities."

Following the hearing, the judge found that the mother was the actual cause of the child's desire to live as a girl: "Mother had fully embraced the child's female identity clouding the issue of what [the child's] feelings would have been at this point had mother been more supportive of [the child's] masculine identity." He further concluded that the child's "[m]other has not only been supportive of his female identity but has actually charged headlong into it with the apparent objective of making it come true."

The judge found the mother's refusal to allow the child to engage in corrective therapy to be extremely persuasive evidence to support his belief that the mother caused the child's cross-gender identification: "So resistant was she to the idea that [the child] should have a male identity that she refused to allow father to take [the child] to see Dr. Kenneth Zucker, who is reputed in the field to have data showing the condition to be reversible."

Ultimately, the judge awarded custody of the child to the father, allowing the mother only limited visitation.

Similarly, in the Kentucky case, Frymire, the judge modified custody to award primary caretaking and medical decision-making of the minor child to the father, who testified that he did not believe the child had a gender issue. The five-year-old girl in that case wore boy's clothing, was referred to by a male name and generally insisted on being treated as a boy.

At trial, the child's therapist testified that the child had GIDC, although she admitted that she did not perform any psychological tests prior to making that determination. The child's art therapist concurred, although she admitted that she lacked experience with transgender youth. The mother's expert thereafter affirmed the diagnosis.
In modifying custody from sole to joint, with the father being designated as the residential parent, the court did not dismiss the possibility that the child may have GIDC, but noted that girls can prefer male sports, toys and clothes without being medicated or requiring intervention. The Court of Appeals thereafter affirmed.

It appears that in both cases, there were a myriad of actions that the supportive parent could have undertaken to attain a more favorable result. At times, it seems that each case turned on technicalities: for instance, the supportive parent's failure to follow the court's orders, failure to obtain a qualified diagnosis prior to making significant decisions affecting the child, or failure of an expert to conduct the appropriate psychological testing.

Asaf Orr, a staff attorney with the National Center for Lesbian Rights who regularly represents parents in custody disputes involving transgender children, says that practitioners have much to learn from the actions of the supportive parents in both Smith and Frymire. He advocates that when confronting cases that involve childhood gender variance, practitioners should focus on the following guiding principles:

1. Encourage a supportive parent to retain competent health-care professionals from the very beginning. Orr believes that it is critical for the supportive parent to seek the advice of a competent health-care professional before making any major decisions regarding the child, including a psychologist, therapist or medical doctor. The attorney should ensure from the start of the case that the supportive parent follows the advice of those health-care professionals. The healthcare professional should treat the child as his or her patient and communicate with each parent openly and address any concerns raised by either parent.

2. Educate the court on the needs of transgender and gender-nonconforming youth.Like the general public,courts often have had little experience with issues involving transgender and gender-nonconforming youth. As a result, it is critical to be prepared to educate the court through the information contained in the pleadings and supplemented by scholarly materials and expert testimony. This will help the court better understand the child as well as the reason that the supportive parent is seeking the proposed custody arrangement or modification. In addition to having been successful in educating courts in several other cases, this approach creates a strong record for appeal, either to defend the court's order or demonstrate why it must be reversed.

3. Adopt a measured approach. Orr says that it is critical for supportive parents and transgender children to be patient with the transition. It is important to counsel your client to abide by court orders and to involve the noncustodial parent in decisions regarding the child's transition. This modicum of caution may mean delaying certain decisions. Orr warns that failure to act methodically and cautiously in this manner could result in the loss of custody to the nonsupportive parent, which could be more damaging than delaying transition. Nevertheless, attorneys should work with their clients to determine a strategy that will minimize the distress of delaying transition, while creating a record that supports the custody or modification being sought by the supportive parent.

As visibility of gender issues grows, New Jersey courts will no doubt soon encounter disputes such as those examined herein. Approaching these highly contentious and sometimes stigmatized gender issues in the proper way may determine the ultimate outcome of these cases.

Reprinted with permission from the June 5 issue of the New Jersey Law Journal. (c) 2014 ALM Media Properties, LLC. Further duplication without permission is prohibited. All rights reserved.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.