United States: Employment Law Commentary - May 2014

MEAL AND REST BREAK COMPLIANCE IN THE POST-BRINKER ERA

By Karen J. Kubin

In Brinker Restaurant Corporation v. Superior Court,1 the California Supreme Court settled the question of the nature of an employer's duty to provide meal periods to its employees and also the question of the timing of meal periods. The court gave comparable guidance with respect to rest periods, clearly delineating when rest periods must be authorized and permitted. Case law developments in the two-year post-Brinker era make it more important than ever for employers to have written compliant meal and rest period policies in place. In this Commentary, the author explains why this is so important and offers a simple approach to ensure that employers' meal and rest period policies are legally compliant. First, a refresher on the legal requirements.

Meal and Rest Periods: The Legal Requirements.

Meal Periods

Under section 512, subdivision (a), of the California Labor Code,2 an employer "may not employ an employee for a work period of more than five hours per day without providing the employee with a meal period of not less than 30 minutes," and "may not employ an employee for a work period of more than 10 hours per day without providing the employee with a second meal period of not less than 30 minutes."3

In Brinker, the defendant contended that an employer's duty to "provide" meal periods to its employees is met by making meal periods available, and the employer is not additionally obligated to "ensure" that the meal periods are taken as the plaintiffs insisted. The Supreme Court sided with the defendant, holding that an employer's meal period obligation is "to relieve its employee of all duty, with the employee thereafter at liberty to use the meal period for whatever purpose he or she desires, but the employer need not ensure that no work is done."4 On the related question of meal period timing, the Court held that under both the statute and wage order,5 "an employer's obligation is to provide a first meal period after no more than five hours of work and a second meal period after no more than 10 hours of work."6

Rest Periods

An employer's obligation to provide rest periods derives from the Wage Order, the text of which the Brinker Court found dispositive: employees must receive 10 minutes of rest time for each four hours of work or "major fraction thereof" – and "major fraction thereof" means "a fraction greater than one-half" – except that a rest period does not need to be authorized for employees "whose total daily work time is less than three and one-half (3½) hours."7 This means, the Court explained, "[e]mployees are entitled to 10 minutes' rest for shifts from three and one-half to six hours in length, 20 minutes for shifts of more than six hours up to 10 hours, 30 minutes for shifts of more than 10 hours up to 14 hours and so on."8

On the related question of rest period timing, the Brinker Court again turned to the Wage Order, holding that employers are "subject to a duty to make a good faith effort to authorize and permit rest breaks in the middle of each work period, but may deviate from that preferred course where practical considerations render it infeasible.9 More specifically, "in the context of an eight-hour shift, '[a]s a general matter,' one rest break should fall on either side of the meal break. [Citation] Shorter or longer shifts and other factors that render such scheduling impracticable may alter this general rule."10

Why Written Compliant Meal and Rest Period Policies Are So Important

In our April 2012 Employment Law Commentary, "The Post-Brinker Workplace – What Every Employer Should Know", we advised that employers should have written compliant meal and rest period policies which are disseminated to the employer's non-exempt employees in a manner calculated to ensure that the employees are fully aware of the policies and their rights under the policies.11 Appellate decisions since Brinker underscore the importance of having written compliant meal and rest period policies. While there are decisions to the contrary, at least three cases decided by California courts of appeal after Brinker have allowed meal and rest period classes to be certified based solely on the absence of a compliant policy.12 To these courts, an employer's liability arises from having a policy that violates the law, or not having a policy at all, and this supplies the predominating common issue that justifies class certification.

One can take issue with the conclusion reached by these courts, and the author of this Commentary certainly does. But until the question they address is definitively settled, it is more important than ever for employers to have written compliant meal and rest period policies – with the emphasis on compliant. Particularly is this so in light of the California Supreme Court's just-filed opinion in Duran v. U.S. Bank National Association.13 Duran teaches that an employer has the right to present its affirmative defenses to an employee's claim.14 If an employer's defense is that it provides meal and rest periods and the employee chose not to take them, a written compliant meal and rest period policy may be the foundation on which the defense is built.

So What's an Employer to Do?

The answer to this question should be self-evident. Existing meal and rest period policies should be dusted off and reviewed to ensure they are fully compliant with Brinker. Employers who do not already have a written policy should promptly put one in place, and above all make sure that it is legally compliant and follows Brinker with laser-like precision. A policy stating that an employee is entitled to a 30-minute meal period if the employee works five hours but is silent about a second meal period if he works ten hours, for example, is not a compliant meal period policy – even if shifts are not scheduled to exceed ten hours. A policy that states an employee is entitled to 10 minutes of rest time for each four hours of work and omits "or major fraction thereof" likewise is not a compliant rest period policy. While the employer's practice may be to provide a second meal period to an employee who works ten hours or to provide a rest period if the employee works three and one-half hours – and cases have been successfully defended on these facts, which is the right outcome – so long as there are cases such as Benton, Faulkinbury and Bradley on the books, a written compliant meal and rest period policy should go a long way toward avoiding certification of a meal or rest period class.

EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE: COMMISSIONS MAY NEED TO BE INCLUDED IN HOLIDAY PAY

By Ann Bevitt

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has held that the Working Time Directive ("Directive") requires a worker's statutory holiday pay to include commission where commission forms an intrinsic part of the worker's normal remuneration. The Directive provides every worker across the 28 Member States of the European Union the right to four weeks' paid annual leave; it also specifies that each week's leave must be paid at the same rate as paid work.

In British Gas v Lock, Mr. Lock, a salesman based in the UK, was paid a basic monthly salary plus commission in arrears. The commission he received amounted to approximately 60 percent of his pay. Mr. Lock took annual leave, during which he could not earn any commission. His employer had calculated his holiday pay based only on his basic salary; as a result, his pay over the following few months was adversely affected. Mr. Lock brought an employment tribunal claim for lost holiday pay.

The tribunal referred the case to the ECJ, which held that where variable elements, such as commission, were intrinsically linked to a worker's normal remuneration, those elements should be included in the calculation of the worker's holiday pay. The ECJ declined to set out the appropriate calculation to be made by employers, and instead ruled that such a calculation was a matter to be decided by the individual Member States' national courts. The ECJ highlighted that the calculation should be considered in light of the Directive's objective to ensure that workers are not penalised when, or deterred from, taking annual leave.

The ECJ's decision is likely to have the greatest impact on employers in the retail and utilities market, where commission forms a substantial part of remuneration. Nonetheless, all employers operating in Member States across Europe will need to ensure that contractual leave arrangements now consider variable elements, such as commission, when calculating a worker's holiday pay.

Footnotes

1 53 Cal. 4th 1004 (2012).

2 All statutory references hereinafter are to the California Labor Code, unless otherwise stated.

3 The statute contains two exceptions. First, if the total work period per day is not more than six hours, the meal period may be waived by mutual consent of employer and employee. (Cal. Lab. Code § 512, subd. (a).) Second, if the total hours worked is no more than 12 hours, the second meal period may be waived by mutual consent of employer and employee if the first period was not waived. (Id.)

4 Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court, supra, 53 Cal. 4th at 1017.

5 Brinker was decided under Wage Order No. 5, which is the wage order applicable to the restaurant industry. Except for the motion picture industry (Wage Order No. 12) and agricultural occupations (Wage Order No. 14), all industries are subject to the same meal and rest period provisions that are contained in Wage Order No. 5.

6 Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court, supra, 53 Cal. 4th at 1049.

7 Id. at 1028.

8 Id. at 1029.

9 Id. at 1031. The Court declined to say what considerations "might be legally sufficient to justify such a departure." Ibid.

10 Id. at 1032.

11 We also suggested other steps an employer should consider taking to help ensure meal and rest period compliance, for example, asking employees for a written acknowledgment of receipt of the policies at hire and periodically thereafter, periodic training of supervisors in the proper implementation of the policies, monitoring whether breaks have been taken and, if not, why not, and so on. Ibid. (http://media.mofo.com/ files/Uploads/Images/120502-Employment-Law-Commentary-April-2012.pdf)

12 Benton v. Telecom Network Specialists, Inc. (2013) 220 Cal.App.4th 701; Faulkinbury v. Boyd & Associates, Inc. (2013) 216 Cal.App.4th 220; Bradley v. Networkers Internat., LLC (2012) 211 Cal. App. 4th 1129.

13 No. S200923 (Cal. Sup. Ct., May 29, 2014).

14 See also Morrison & Foerster Client Alert, "A New Dawn for California Class Actions", by William L. Stern (May 30, 2014).

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Ann Bevitt
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions