United States: Antitrust Update: Second Circuit Adopts Rule Making It Easier To Find Liability For Foreign Anticompetitive Conduct

On June 4, 2014, the Second Circuit issued its decision in Lotes Co., Ltd. v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., an important ruling on the reach of the U.S. antitrust laws to foreign conduct.1

The Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act ("FTAIA")2 limits the reach of U.S. antitrust liability to foreign conduct that has a "direct, substantial, and reasonably foreseeable effect" on U.S. commerce. In Lotes, the Second Circuit construed this language to require plaintiffs to show only a "reasonably proximate causal nexus" between the conduct and the effect on U.S. domestic commerce or import commerce, a view recently endorsed by the Seventh Circuit in Minn-Chem.3 This view contrasts with the Ninth Circuit's more stringent standard that the effect on U.S. commerce be an "immediate consequence" of the anticompetitive conduct.4

This Alert analyzes the Second Circuit's rationale, discusses its relative lack of guidance, and identifies other pending cases and decisions on the same issue.

Case Background

Lotes, Co., Ltd. ("Lotes") is a Taiwanese corporation that manufactures USB connectors for electronic devices. It sells to Taiwanese and Chinese Original Design Manufacturers that assemble computer products incorporating USB connectors for sale around the world, including in the U.S. Defendants compete with Lotes in making and manufacturing USB connectors. Lotes alleged that defendants engaged in anticompetitive conduct by refusing to license USB 3.0 technology on terms required by a standard setting organization. The refusal to license, combined with the threat of patent litigation if Lotes uses the technology, allegedly threatened to shut down Lotes' factories in China, decrease competition in USB 3.0 connectors, and ultimately lead to price increases in the U.S. Lotes filed suit in the Southern District of New York on October 4, 2012. On May 14, 2013, the district court dismissed the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, holding that the FTAIA restrictions were jurisdictional5 and that Lotes failed to plausibly allege a "direct, substantial, and reasonably foreseeable effect" on U.S. domestic or import commerce.6

The Second Circuit's Decision

In Lotes, the Second Circuit rejected the district court's analysis and held that: 1) the FTAIA is a substantive, not jurisdictional statute; and 2) "direct effect" under the FTAIA means a "reasonably proximate causal nexus" to the anticompetitive conduct. Still, the Second Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of the complaint, holding that any direct effect caused by defendants' foreign anticompetitive conduct did not "give rise" to Lotes's claims.

First, the Second Circuit quickly determined that the FTAIA's threshold requirements are substantive and not jurisdictional since there is no clear statement from Congress directing that the requirements be jurisdictional.7

Second, the Second Circuit rejected the district court's interpretation – based on a 2004 Ninth Circuit ruling8 – that construed the FTAIA's "direct effect" element to require the effect to follow "as an immediate consequence of the defendant's activity."Under that interpretation, the district court in Lotes found that there could be no antitrust liability because price increases of electronic devices in the U.S. did not follow as an immediate consequence of the attempted monopolization of the foreign USB 3.0 connector market, even though such conduct may have led to higher prices for U.S. consumers.9 Troubled by such an outcome, the Second Circuit adopted the interpretation advocated by the U.S. Department of Justice's Antitrust Division and the Federal Trade Commission in amicus briefs and adopted by the Seventh Circuit sitting en banc in Minn-Chem.10 Under that test, a direct effect requires only that the anticompetitive conduct have a "reasonably proximate causal nexus" to the adverse effect on domestic commerce.11 12

Third, the court found that, regardless of what is required to show a "direct effect" to satisfy the FTAIA, there was no antitrust violation where the domestic effect caused by defendants' conduct did not "give rise" to Lotes's claims, as also required by the FTAIA.13 In Lotes, this meant that antitrust liability would only attach if higher prices in the U.S. proximately caused Lotes's injury.14 In fact, Lotes's injury was caused directly by defendants' exclusionary conduct outside the U.S. – the Chinese patent infringement suits.15 If anything, the court held, the causal relationship was backwards since Lotes's injury of being excluded from the market allegedly caused the increased prices.16 Since an effect can never precede its cause, the court found that higher prices did not "give rise" to Lotes's injury.17 As the court explained: "The FTAIA thus includes two distinct causation inquiries, one asking whether the defendants' foreign conduct caused a cognizable domestic effect, and the other asking whether that effect caused the plaintiff's injury."18

The Implications of the Lotes Decision on Antitrust Liability

Interpreting the FTAIA in a way that could lead to increased antitrust liability: In Lotes, the Second Circuit joined the Seventh Circuit in interpreting the FTAIA in a way that could expand the reach of the U.S. antitrust laws. The Second Circuit recognized that this less stringent interpretation is necessary in light of today's global supply chain. "[A]nticompetitive injuries can be transmitted through multi-layered supply chains" and the Ninth Circuit's restrictive "immediate consequence" approach would give a free pass to almost any anticompetitive conduct that occurred outside the U.S.19 The court appeared to view its ruling as necessary to keep pace with the realities of increased globalization and the recognition that manufacturing of items abroad could, in some cases, harm U.S. consumers.

Will the Ninth Circuit join its colleagues in this narrower FTAIA interpretation? In choosing to adopt the advocated by antitrust regulators and the Seventh Circuit, the Second Circuit pointedly disagreed with the Ninth Circuit's reasoning in requiring the "immediate consequence" interpretation of "direct effect."20 The court criticized the Ninth Circuit's choice of one dictionary meaning over another and its reliance on the Supreme Court's interpretation of a "nearly identical term" that was in a statute with different language and a different purpose.21 The Ninth Circuit will have an opportunity to revisit this issue in the appeal of the AU Optronics case; the antitrust bar is waiting to see whether the Ninth Circuit will rethink its FTAIA interpretation and adopt an approach in line with the Second and Seventh Circuits.22 The Second Circuit's reasoned opinion in Lotes could provide the Ninth Circuit some of the justification it needs to do that.

How will the "reasonably proximate causal nexus" test be applied? Should the test adopted in Lotes become widely accepted, the next significant issue will be how the "reasonably proximate causal nexus" test is applied. In Lotes, the Second Circuit did not decide this "rather difficult question" because it disposed of the case on other grounds.23 The court indicated that it views the "reasonably proximate causal nexus" question as a fluid one: courts will have to consider the structure of the market, the nature of the commercial relationships at each link in the causal chain, and use all of the traditional tools courts have used to analyze questions of proximate causation.24 The Seventh Circuit is currently considering this question in the Motorola Mobility LLC v. AU Optronics Corp. case.25 A Seventh Circuit panel recently held that there was no antitrust liability in the case where alleged price fixers of LCD panels sold them abroad to foreign companies, who then incorporated them into products that were exported to the U.S.26 Since foreign action filtered through many layers, the Seventh Circuit found that any effect in the U.S. would be too indirect to have the necessary causal nexus.27 The Seventh Circuit is considering rehearing the case en banc, however. Notably, several foreign competition authorities have submitted amicus briefs to the Seventh Circuit in opposition of the motion for rehearing en banc, raising concerns about potential overreaching of U.S. antitrust laws on foreign conduct. The Seventh Circuit has called for the views of the U.S. Solicitor General.

The "gives rise" limitation of the FTAIA is another way for companies to avoid antitrust liability: While most of the recent attention surrounding the FTAIA is appropriately around the interpretation of the "direct effect" prong, the importance of the "gives rise" element should not be overlooked. In Lotes, the Second Circuit reached its decision not to apply liability based on this element of the FTAIA and the Seventh Circuit's Motorola decision cited the "gives rise" requirement as an alternate basis for avoiding liability. While the courts continue to refine the application of a "reasonably proximate causal nexus," the "gives rise" limitation of the FTAIA may provide another barrier for the government, an individual, or a firm seeking to hold a company liable in the U.S. for foreign anticompetitive conduct.

Footnotes

1 Lotes Co., Ltd. v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., No. 13-2280, slip op. (2d Cir. June 4, 2014).

2 15 U.S.C. § 6a. The FTAIA applies to both criminal and civil antitrust conduct.

3 Minn-Chem, Inc. v. Agrium, Inc., 683 F.3d 845, 857 (7th Cir. 2012) (en banc).

4 United States v. LSL Biotechnologies, 379 F.3d 672 (9th Cir. 2004).

5 Lotes Co. v. Hon Hai Precision Indus. Co., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69407, at *25 (S.D.N.Y. May 14, 2013).

6 Id. at *35-36.

7 Lotes Co., Ltd. v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., No. 13-2280, slip op. at 22-30 (2d Cir. June 4, 2014).

8 United States v. LSL Biotechnologies, 379 F.3d 672 (9th Cir. 2004).

9 Lotes Co., Ltd., No. 13-2280, slip op. at 34.

10 Id.

11 Minn-Chem, Inc., 683 F.3d 845.

12 Lotes Co., Ltd., No. 13-2280, slip op. at 35-36.

13 "[The Sherman Act] shall not apply to conduct involving trade or commerce . . . with foreign nations unless . . . such effect gives rise to a claim under the provisions of [the Sherman Act]." 15 U.S.C. § 6(a)(2).

14 Lotes Co., Ltd., No. 13-2280, slip op. at 47.

15 Id.

16 Id. at 48.

17 Id.

18 Id. at 46.

19 Id. at 43.

20 Id. at 35-36.

21 Id. at 36-40.

22 United States v. AU Optronics Corp., No. 12-10500 (9th Cir. argued Oct. 18, 2013).

23 Lotes Co., Ltd., No. 13-2280, slip op. at 45.

24 Id. at 44.

25 Motorola Mobility LLC v. AU Optronics Corp., 746 F.3d 842 (7th Cir. 2014).

26 Id. at 844.

27 Id.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Emails

From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.