United States: Oregon Tax Court Makes Unitary Business Determination

The Oregon Tax Court has determined that a rent-to-own retailer and its operating subsidiary engaged in the same line of business did not share centralized management, and accordingly were not considered to be unitary for Oregon corporation excise tax purposes.1 The Court also found that the subsidiary franchisor lacked Oregon corporation excise tax nexus and a wholly owned captive insurance company was unitary with the retailer.


The taxpayer, a rent-to-own retailer, acquired an operating subsidiary in 1996, which subsequently focused solely on franchise operations. The operating subsidiary had also engaged in the rent-to-own business in competition with the taxpayer, but its primary source of revenue was from the sale of rental equipment to its franchisees, who in turn offered the equipment to the general public for rent or purchase under a rental-purchase program. During 2003, seven stores franchised by the operating subsidiary were located in Oregon and the operating subsidiary filed an Oregon corporation excise tax return on a separate company basis.

The taxpayer was issued a notice of deficiency assessment in 2011 by the Oregon Department of Revenue for the 2003 tax year which alleged that the operating subsidiary had Oregon corporation excise tax nexus, and that the taxpayer and its subsidiary were part of a unitary group which also included the taxpayer's wholly-owned captive insurance company.

The taxpayer challenged the Department's assessment in the Oregon Tax Court on the basis that its operating subsidiary and captive insurance company operated autonomously and were not members of the same unitary group. The taxpayer also claimed that its operating subsidiary lacked nexus for Oregon excise tax purposes and that the statute of limitations prevented the assessment.2

Unitary Determination

The Oregon Tax Court began by addressing the substantive issue regarding how to determine which entities are members of a unitary group for purposes of the Oregon corporation excise tax. Oregon imposes a tax on the income of every corporation that derives income from sources within the state, including income from tangible or intangible property located or having a situs in Oregon and income from any activities carried on in Oregon.3 Members of a unitary group are required to file corporation excise tax returns on a combined basis.4 A unitary group is defined as a corporation or group of corporations engaged in business activities that constitute a single trade or business.5 For the tax year at issue, a single trade or business was defined by statute as a business enterprise in which "there exists directly or indirectly between the members or parts of the enterprise a sharing or exchange of value as demonstrated by (i) centralized management or a common executive force; (ii) centralized administrative services or functions resulting in economies of scale; and (iii) flow of goods, capital resources or services demonstrating functional integration."6 An administrative rule also provided that all three criteria must be met for separate entities to be engaged in a single trade or business.7

At issue in this case was whether the current or previous version of the statute in effect for the 2003 tax year addressing the "single trade or business" definition was controlling with respect to making the unitary determination. Although the parties stipulated that the tax year at issue in this case was 2003, the term "tax year" is not defined by statute in Oregon. Because the taxpayer filed the 2003 amended Oregon return upon which the Department issued the deficiency in 2009, the Department attempted to apply the current version of the statute8 to prove the unitary nature of the relationship between the taxpayer and the franchise subsidiary.

In determining that the statute in effect for the 2003 tax year was the proper version to use, the Court examined the legislative intent of the changes to the statute that were made in 2007. According to the Court, the Oregon legislature originally planned to amend the statute by making the changes effective for all returns filed from the effective date forward subject to the new law. However, testimony during the legislative process led to a change in the enacted language, making the modification prospective and giving taxpayers "predictability" that the 2007 amendments would not be applied to tax years prior to January 1, 2007.9 Similarly, the Court refused to apply to the 2003 tax year an administrative regulation also amended in 2007,10 despite the Department's protests that the rule simply brought the construction of the statute in harmony with a prior decision of the Court.11 The Oregon Supreme Court had previously provided guidance indicating that the presence of all three factors was crucial to a unitary determination due to the conjunctive nature of the statute.12

Operating Subsidiary

Following the conclusion that the statute in effect for the 2003 tax year was the proper version of the statute to use, the Tax Court focused on whether the three unitary factors were present in making a unitary determination regarding the operating subsidiary. At the time of its acquisition in 1996, the operating subsidiary had its own employees, systems, and policies and performed its own business functions. The operating subsidiary also had its own brand separate from the brand developed by its parent. Other than limiting its business to franchise operations, the operating subsidiary did not appear to change its business substantially after being acquired by the taxpayer. The taxpayer, which processed its own payroll for its 15,000 employees, also processed payroll for the operating subsidiary's eighteen employees in 2003 and shared some other corporate services. The taxpayer included the operating subsidiary's bank accounts in its daily cash sweep process.

Focusing on whether the taxpayer and its operating subsidiary had centralized management or a common executive force, the Court acknowledged that two members of the operating subsidiary's board of directors also served as executive officers of the taxpayer, but did not perform services for the operating subsidiary.13 Dismissing this fact as well as the factors presented by the Department as indicative of centralized management, the Court found that the relationship between the taxpayer and its operating subsidiary did not meet the statutory requirement of having centralized management or a common executive force.

Because the first factor necessary to prove the existence of a unitary relationship between the taxpayer and its franchise subsidiary was not found to be present, the Court did not consider the presence of the remaining two factors,14 and rendered moot the issue of including the operating subsidiary's sales in the numerator of the taxpayer's unitary group sales factor.

Captive Insurance Subsidiary

The Court also focused on the three factors demonstrating a unitary relationship between the taxpayer and its captive insurance company subsidiary. With respect to this subsidiary, the taxpayer conceded that centralized management was present. Therefore, the Court considered only whether economies of scale and functional integration were present.

Noting that the centralized administration of insurance in the captive insurance company subsidiary relieved the other members of the enterprise from administering that function, the Court determined that economies of scale were present. Likewise, a substantial exchange of value demonstrating function integration existed as indicated by the very creation of the captive insurance company subsidiary. Thus, all three unitary factors were found to be present and the captive insurance company was held to be properly includable in the combined excise tax return with the taxpayer.


After determining that the operating subsidiary was not required to file with the taxpayer's unitary group, the Court addressed the question of whether the operating subsidiary should even be subject to the Oregon corporation excise tax. In determining whether the operating subsidiary was doing business in Oregon during 2003, the Court focused primarily on the term "doing business" as defined by statute for purposes of Oregon corporation excise tax. The term "doing business" includes any transaction or transactions in the course of activities conducted within the state by the corporation.15 Furthermore, regulations clarify that a corporation with receipts from royalties or franchise fees or the sale or transfer of tangible personal property pursuant to franchise or license agreements may be subject to the excise tax if the corporation engages in activities that rise to the level of doing business in Oregon.16

The operating subsidiary participated in relatively minimal activities within Oregon in the 2003 tax year. For example, the operating subsidiary did not own or rent any real or tangible personal property in Oregon, did not have an office in Oregon, and did not have any resident employees or agents in the state. The Department claimed that two employees, including an executive officer, visited Oregon to physically inspect Oregon franchisees' operations and provide on-site training. In addition, the operating subsidiary's employees visited Oregon for portions of eight days during 2003 to visit the seven franchisee stores located there. Focused on the regulation addressing this point, the Court noted that there was no evidence that the operating subsidiary engaged in transactions other than the receipt of royalties that were exempt from the Oregon corporation excise tax in 2003. Noting the sporadic and non-recurrent nature of the activities in Oregon, the Court concluded that based on the regulatory requirements stipulated, the operating subsidiary was not doing business in Oregon in 2003.

Due to the restrictive nature of the regulation enacted by the Department, the Court declined to consider the broader constitutional and statutory limits on the imposition of nexus.


The Oregon Tax Court's decision includes testimony from a recognized industry expert, highlights the level of authority of an administrative regulation, and contemplates retroactive application of enacted legislation. It provides an example of a unitary determination which is well-thought out and carefully made.

University of Connecticut School of Law Professor Richard Pomp testified as an expert witness for the taxpayer in this controversy. Professor Pomp provided interesting explanations of the rationale behind the concept of a combined report, including how the concept was developed, and the three primary methodologies (separate accounting, formulary apportionment, and combined reporting) commonly used by states to tax interstate companies. Professor Pomp explained the essence of the unitary relationship, noting that "if a corporation is operating a unitary business within and without Oregon, the State has the necessary nexus with the out-of-state activities to allow it to apportion a share of all of the corporation's unitary income."

When considering the existence of a unitary relationship, Pomp cautioned against inferring intercompany flows of value based on trivial non-operational functions performed by a parent company on behalf of its wholly owned subsidiaries. In this case, the Court carefully examined the facts and heeded this warning to conclude that the operating subsidiary was not unitary with the taxpayer.

Also of note was the Court's clear adherence to a regulation adopted by the Department. By refusing to allow the Department to depart from its restrictive regulation specifically addressing nexus for a franchisor and apply the more liberal general nexus rules allowed by statute and case law,17 the Court respected the regulation limiting the Department's power to tax interstate franchisors.

Finally, the Court demonstrated its deference to the legislative process to determine whether retroactive application of a statute was appropriate. The act of diligently examining legislative testimony led to the conclusion to reject retroactive application of the law which changed the definition of a unitary business.


1 Rent-A-Center Inc. v. Department of Revenue, Oregon Tax Court, No. TC-MD 111031D, May 12, 2014.

2 The taxpayer chose not to maintain the position that the Department failed to issue a timely notice of deficiency in accordance with the Oregon statute of limitations during the Tax Court challenge. 3 OR. REV. STAT. § 318.020(2).

4 OR. REV. STAT. § 317.710(2); OR. ADMIN. R. 150-317.710(5)(a)-(B).

5 OR. REV. STAT. § 317.705(2).

6 OR. REV. STAT. § 317.705(3)(a).

7 OR. ADMIN. R. 150-317.705(3)(a)(2).

8 OR. REV. STAT. § 317.705(3)(a). The current version of the statute served to clarify and broaden the instances in which a unitary return would be required by replacing the term "single trade or business" with "unitary business" and replacing the word "and" with "or" in the list of requirements that explain the demonstration of sharing or exchange of value. The amendment was applicable to tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2007 and was included in Or. Laws 2007, Ch. 323, Section 1.

9 As noted in the Senate amendments to S.B. 178 (deleting "[a]ny tax year for which a return is subject to audit or adjustment by the Department of Revenue on or after the effective date of this 2007 Act"). 10 OR. ADMIN. R. 150-317.705(3)(a).

11 Maytag Corp. v. Dep't. of Rev., 12 OTR 502 (1993). The three statutory criteria for making a unitary determination were considered in this ruling where a unitary determination was based on the operational nature of the subsidiaries despite the absence of one of the three criteria, not because two of the three unitary criteria were present.

12 Preble v. Dep't. of Rev., 14 P.3d 613 (Or. 2000), holding that OR. REV. STAT. § 305.265(2) listed "three different requirements . . . [that] are connected by the word 'and,' which indicates that they [the three different requirements] are not alternatives." 13 Additional facts presented by the taxpayer included: (i) the subsidiary controlled its own full time management and daily operations; (ii) there was no active daily management of the subsidiary by the taxpayer; (iii) there were no transfers of personnel between the entities, (iv) the taxpayer did not offer centralized training or require the subsidiary to adopt its manuals or policies; and (v) the taxpayer did not include the subsidiary's financial results in the profits used to determine bonuses for its own management team. The Department cited the following as factors indicating centralized management: (i) the taxpayer's officers received stock options from the publicly traded franchise subsidiary; (ii) the subsidiary's previous executive officer was promoted to the executive team of the taxpayer; and (iii) the taxpayer's board of directors discussed a growth strategy which included the potential acquisition of some of the franchised stores associated with the subsidiary and closely monitored legislation affecting the rent-to-own industry.

14 The other two factors provided in OR. REV. STAT. § 317.705(3)(a) are: (i) centralized administrative services or functions resulting in economies of scale; and (ii) the flow of goods, capital resources or services demonstrating functional integration.

15 OR. REV. STAT. § 317.010(4).

16 OR. ADMIN. R. 150-318.020(2)(3). Such activities specifically include inspection of the franchisees' businesses or records and providing training in Oregon to franchisees. The regulation also stated that companies subject to the excise tax would not be subject to the state income tax. The reason for this statement is that the Oregon corporation excise tax is a tax for the privilege of carrying on or doing business in Oregon and is measured by net income, while the Oregon corporation income tax is for corporations not carrying on or doing business in Oregon, but with income from an Oregon source.

17 OR. REV. STAT. § 317.010(4); Ann Sakes Tile & Stone, Inc. v. Dep't. of Rev., 20 OTR 377 (2011).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:
  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.
  • Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.
    If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here
    If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here

    Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

    Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

    Use of www.mondaq.com

    You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


    Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

    The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


    Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

    • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
    • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
    • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

    Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

    Information Collection and Use

    We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

    We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

    Mondaq News Alerts

    In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


    A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

    Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

    Log Files

    We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


    This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

    Surveys & Contests

    From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


    If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


    From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

    *** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


    This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

    Correcting/Updating Personal Information

    If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

    Notification of Changes

    If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

    How to contact Mondaq

    You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

    If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.

    By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions