United States: Time To Break Some Trademark Rules In 2014

Last Updated: May 21 2014
Article by Andrew D. Price and Justin E. Pierce

The increasing practice of brand owners 'verbing up' their own marks and in some cases deliberately disrupting their own logos demonstrates that strong brands can be flexible, fluid and living.

Under the traditional rule of proper trademark use (also known as the ACID test), brands must be used:

  • as adjectives;
  • in a consistent manner;
  • with an identification or symbol indicating whether the mark is registered; and
  • in a distinctive or attention-grabbing manner. While this standard works for many brands, the first two elements – using brands as adjectives only and in a consistent manner – are too restrictive when it comes to strong brands.

Beyond adjectives

Recent trademark usage trends suggest that there are ways that strong or well-known brands can use their marks as a noun or verb without substantial risk of genericide. A number of companies have used their key trademarks as verbs in advertising campaigns without suffering any apparent genericide damage – this is despite having publicly displayed policies on how to properly use and refer to their trademarks (ie, use as an adjective as opposed to verb/noun). For example, investment company Vanguard used the term 'vanguarding' to convey the long-term outlook of its investment products to investors; while Microsoft's chief executive officer Steve Ballmer told the New York Times in 2009 that the Bing search engine brand had the potential to verb up and that he hoped people will 'bing' a new restaurant to find its address. Recently Google launched its advertising campaign "Play your heart out" to entice consumers to visit its PLAY store.

Traditionally, companies would not use or encourage use of their brand names as verbs, or as anything else beyond use as an adjective. Most feared that if a branded product or service became a verb, the brand would lose its distinctiveness and become a name for a generic category or function. A brand is lost to genericide when use of the term becomes so prevalent or generic that it is no longer associated with the brand-owning company.

History is replete with successful brands that were lost to genericide and are now viewed as generic terms for certain products: aspirin, escalator and zipper were all distinctive trademarks at one time. Companies even launched advertising campaigns to encourage the public to use their trademarks properly. Consider the example of Xerox, which urged consumers to 'photocopy' instead of 'xeroxing' documents, in an attempt to ensure that the phrase 'to xerox something' did not become another way of saying 'to photocopy something'.

If this happened, then the term Xerox would not be associated with the company's distinctive brand of copiers, but instead with the function of photocopying. This was significant because genericide of the Xerox brand would have resulted in the loss of ability to distinguish its products or services from those of competitors.

Yet in stark contrast to these historical examples, the increase in competition in nearly every product category – along with greater consumer sophistication today – has reduced the risk posed by a brand name becoming a verb. Moreover, ever-shortening product lifecycles and the fleeting attention spans of most internet users mean that brands must focus on gaining a market share and voice in a short period of time.

As a practical matter in today's market, when a brand becomes popular and its use widespread, there is low risk of genericide if the brand is verbed up. The public's use of the Google brand is one of the best examples of this. People often say that they will 'google' something on the Internet to mean that they looked up some information online using the Google search engine, rather than just any search engine.

Given the pace of change evident in today's internet-fuelled markets, there is clear business value associated with the verbed-up use of brands. To mitigate any risk of trademark genericide, we suggest that rights holders:

  • make clear to consumers that the action suggested by the verbed-up brand use cannot be accomplished without using the branded product or service – the verbed-up brand can be built into taglines, slogans and/or logos that reinforce this point above (eg, "Vanguarding can't happen without Vanguard" and "Google Play, play your heart out").
  • create and publish verbed-up brand use guidelines (and/or update trademark guidelines) that reinforce the first point above;
  • register the verbed-up brand or the tagline, slogan or logo containing the verbed-up brand;
  • send friendly letters to publishers and media outlets that do not appear to appreciate the necessary connection between the brand and the verb in their references;
  • work with dictionaries to ensure that any verb listings are consistent with new verbed-up brand policies; and
  • conduct regular monitoring of the public's use and view of the verbed-up brand – ultimately, it is the consuming public that determines, through its use, whether a verbed-up brand has lost distinctiveness through genericide.

Fluid and living brands

Traditional thinking says that a mark should be represented in a consistent manner (ie, the same way each time). Brand owners fear the loss of rights that can occur when they cannot tack rights from an updated version of a mark onto rights from the original mark. Tacking requires that two marks make the same continuing commercial impression, which can prove a high bar. However, can a rights holder act strategically to get the best of both worlds: a mark that is protected, yet flexible?

Google did something disruptive and innovative when it starting morphing its GOOGLE logo on a regular basis. The so-called 'Doodles' are, as the search giant notes, "fun, surprising, and sometimes spontaneous" (see examples above). Initially, the Doodles startled consumers. Now demand is so great that Google has a team of dedicated illustrators and has created over 1,000 variations of its brand. The innovation worked: the Doodles have helped Google to attract consumers, keep them interested and build brand loyalty.

Some call brands such as this fluid trademarks. However, this may be a misnomer. It might be more accurate to call these brands living trademarks. Like a time-lapse video of a person ageing, these brands transform in appearance over time, but retain their essence; but unlike such a video, these marks are not really fluid – the word calls to mind motion marks, which have a stream of movement that is missing here.

Why do living trademarks work for Google? The brand is strong enough to avoid getting lost in the Doodles. The underlying famous brand, in effect, shines through. Over time, the Doodles have arguably enhanced goodwill in the Google brand by making it come to life in the eyes of consumers. And Google has conditioned consumers – for the benefit of all brand owners – to believe that strong brands can change, yet remain consistent source indicators.

Google notably continues to use its classic GOOGLE logo (see below) and maintains registrations for both that logo and the word GOOGLE in standard characters. Moreover, Google has played it safe on the PR side by not attacking Doodle parodies and becoming a trademark bully.

Tinkering with a major brand was once unthinkable. Google's experiment has changed consumer expectations of what it means for a strong brand to be consistent. It should therefore change how brand owners, their counsel and trademark offices view strong brands: they have the ability to morph and at the same time to build goodwill. In the non-profit context, the concept of a living trademark provides a particularly intriguing option. Non-profits with strong brands could – if their culture, tradition and polict allow – be more forgiving when it comes to allowing chapters, for example, to make changes to the licensed brand to attract attention and build brand loyalty with their local audience.

Trademark offices should find a way to register living trademarks and give them special status. Offices could require brand owners to submit evidence of a mark's strength and examples of the mark in varied form. In exchange, registrations could provide rights in the part of the mark that is consistent and confer two special legal presumptions. First, the logo may change in more than a material way without loss of rights in the underlying design or stylisation. Second, the underlying design or stylisation is entitled to broader protection than a typical design or stylisation, in the same way that the root word of a family of marks is entitled to broader protection by virtue of the family. (Trademark offices could note that this does not mean the mark is a phantom mark, such as LIVING XXXX FLAVOURS, where XXXX is a variable signalling that the applicant seeks to register multiple marks through one application.)

So, when breaking the traditional (ACID test) rule of using marks in a consistent manner, rights holders and counsel should:

  • make sure the subject design or stylisation is strong, with substantial goodwill;
  • gauge how much to play with the design or stylisation based on the relative strength of the mark (eg, famous marks can be changed the most);
  • change only the design or stylisation, not the corresponding word mark (except when it comes to breaking the ACID test rule of using word marks as adjectives, above);
  • make sure that the essence of the logo is retained (eg, the stylisation of the word mark GOOGLE is regularly discernible);
  • continue regular trademark use of the original design or stylisation;
  • maintain trademark registrations for the original design or stylisation and underlying word mark standing alone;
  • not be a trademark bully when others do parodies;
  • refer to fluid trademarks as living trademarks; and
  • advocate for trademark offices to register living trademarks as such, and give them special status.

Trademark law and practice must evolve to keep pace with changing consumer sophistication and expectations. As it does, do not be afraid to break the old rule of proper trademark use when it comes to strong brands, especially famous ones.

Originally published by World Trademark Review.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Stites & Harbison PLLC
Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Stites & Harbison PLLC
Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions