United States: Whose Social Network Account: A Trade Secret Approach To Allocating Rights

INTRODUCTION

Imagine that you work for a law firm, focusing on a discrete practice area, say music law. One of your many non-billable responsibilities is to contribute to an industry newsletter. However, the law is changing so rapidly in your area that your articles are typically out of date the moment they are published. One day, you decide that your time would be better spent opening a Twitter account and simply tweeting the latest developments. In the casual spirit of Twitter, you write tweets that not only inform, but also entertain your clients and yourself. You make wry comments about judicial opinions and the antics of the outsized personalities in the industry. You write a little about your personal life, in part because you use the same account to keep in touch with friends and family. Within a few months, several thousand people in your industry have become followers of your Twitter stream. You and your law firm are delighted. The firm even adds a link to your account on the firm web page.

A few years later, you leave your employer to go to a different firm. To your surprise, a week after you leave, your old firm demands that you return "their" Twitter account. What to do? Who "owns" the account?

This is, of course, not a problem unique to law firms. In many industries, workers maintain popular social network accounts followed by thousands, even millions, of people. How do we figure out when the account belongs to the employer and when it belongs to the worker? Who gets the account when the parties part ways? This question has recently arisen in a spate of cases. In PhoneDog v. Kravitz, a company that provides cell phone reviews sued a reviewer for taking his Twitter account with him after he left the job.1 In Eagle v. Morgan, a former employee sued a financial service company for changing the password on her LinkedIn account and transferring it to another employee the day she was fired.2 In Christou v. Beatport, LLC, a night-club owner sued a former employee for using the password to the plaintiffs MySpace pages to advertise his new club.3

The cases have aroused intense interest.4 Approximately one billion people participate in online social networking5. In addition, more than 70 percent of companies maintain a social network presence, and the number is rapidly increasing.6 Cumulatively, employers and individuals have enormous investments in social network platforms at stake. The precedents set will affect not only these investments but also the public interest in preserving the immense benefits of social network use.

These disputes are likely the harbingers of many more to come for two principal reasons. First, social network accounts can be quite valuable. A social network account may provide the means to transmit a message to thousands of people. In the PhoneDog case, for example, 17,000 people followed the Twitter account at issue.7 However, a social network account provides much more than a means to make a one-way broadcast. A popular account offers access to an engaged audience, a means to crowdsource ideas and feedback, a self-reinforcing community of people connected by their shared interests, and, finally, a way to reach into the network of each person linked to the account.

Take Lady Gaga's Facebook page, for example. The pop star has fifty million Facebook users linked to her account.8 She uses her Facebook page to promote her music, products, and charities by sending messages which appear automatically in the newsfeeds of her followers.9 Meanwhile, her followers can both respond to Lady Gaga and communicate with each other by posting on her page, giving Lady Gaga direct feedback and strengthening her community of fans, the so-called "little monsters."10 Moreover, each fan may pass on Lady Gaga's comments and other postings to their friends. As a result, Lady Gaga's messages are distributed to an even larger circle than the fifty million Facebook users linked to her account." Unsurprisingly, not only individuals, but a broad range of organizations, have created social network accounts to take advantage of these opportunities.

Second, the blurring of personal and professional roles on social network platforms leads to confusion over who has the superior rights to account. Because the account is in some ways a proxy for a person, people tend to use one account on a given platform to represent themselves for all purposes, including both personal and professional types of use. And because users participating in social network platforms expect interaction with people, organizations have found that using real people to "converse" on their behalf in a personal manner leads to success on social network platforms. Therefore, the features that make social network platforms effective as a means of communication lead to competing claims to an account.11

Individuals tend to blur personal and professional use at the same time that employers ask their workersl2 to represent them in a personal manner. Where there is no express agreement on the issue, the question of who has superior rights to the account becomes blurry indeed.

This is a new area with no clear legal framework. The problem of legal framing is this: a social network account can be shorn of all content that gives rise to clear legal rights. The name of the account may be changed to avoid a trademark claim. Copyrighted and private content can be deleted. The account may be reduced to a node to which other people have linked their accounts. No clear legal rights inhere in the links to the account, yet, by providing automatic access to an audience, the links are what give the account value.

This Article argues that trade secret law provides the best legal framework for resolving these disputes. The secret of access to the social network account-the password-should be protectable as a trade secret.13 A password's secrecy confers independent economic value by giving the account holder exclusive access to the links in the account.14 This trade secret protection, however, would be highly limited. It would protect only access to the account, but not any content otherwise available to the public. Crucially, any other user could still contact the account's followers through other accounts. Although narrow, trade secret protection would protect the interest at the heart of these disputes: the right to retain exclusive access to the account's followers.

Similar trade secret claims have survived motions to dismiss in two cases on the issue.15 This Article expands on the cursory reasoning in these cases and argues that protecting the account's password as a trade secret best balances the interests at stake in these disputes. The investment of time and effort to build up links to a social network account appears to yield significant social benefits in the form of improved dissemination of information, economic efficiency, and labor mobility. The bluffing of professional and personal roles while building up the links to accounts only appears to add to these benefits.

Trade secret law preserves incentives to invest in the account while protecting access to the account from misappropriation. Further, the hired-toinvent doctrine would allocate rights in social network accounts between employers and workers at the moment of creation in a manner that not only maximizes incentives to invest in social networking, but also preserves workers' incentives to invest in themselves.16 As a result, the trade secret approach promotes the public interest in online social network use without unduly hampering workers' rights. Moreover, this approach would, except in a few rare cases, work in concert with the resolution of other legal interests implicated in these disputes, such as privacy, copyright, and trademark concerns.

To view this article in full please click here.

Footnotes

1. PhoneDog v. Kravitz, No. C 11-03474 MEJ, 2011 WL 5415612 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2011).

2. Eagle v. Morgan, No. I1-4303, 2011 WL 6739448 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 22, 2011).

3. Christou v. Beatport, LLC, 849 F. Supp. 2d 1055 (D. Colo. 2012); see also Maremont v. Susan Fredman Design Grp., Ltd., No. 10 C 7811, 2011 WL 6101949 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 7, 2011) (involving an employee suing an employer for accessing and posting messages through her personal Twitter and Facebook accounts); Ardis Health, LLC v. Nankivell, I I CIV. 5013, 2011 WL 4965172 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 19, 2011) (involving a plaintiff who claimed that a former employee took social network accounts she had maintained as an employee when she left plaintiffs employment); Complaint, TEKsystems, Inc. v. Hammemick, No. 10-cv- 00819 (D. Minn. Mar. 16, 2010), available at http://op.bna.com/pen.nsf/id/jmer-86fq5g/$File/ linkedin-hammernick.pdf (alleging that a former employee contacted former clients through her Linkedin account in violation of her noncompete agreement).

4. See, e.g., John Biggs, A Dispute Over Who Owns a Twitter Account Goes to Court, N.Y. Timos, Dec. 26, 2011, at Bl; Elise Bloom & John Barry, The Role of Social Media in Workplace Disputes, CORP. COUNS., Mar. 20, 2012, at 22; Melissa Maleske, Companies Sue Employees Over Linkedn, Twitter Accounts, INs]oiDCouNsmEL, Mar. 2012, at 19; Joe Palazzolo, Before Dispute over Twitter Account, a Fight over LinkedIn, WAL Sr. J. BiLoG (Jan. 10, 2012, 12:12 PM), http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2012/01/10.

5. See infra note 19.

6. The Overlooked Side of Social Media, BusINESs WEEK (Sept. 11, 2009), http:// www.businessweek.com/stories/2009-09-ll/the-overlooked-side-of-social-mediabusiness week-business-news-stock-market-and-financial-advice; Doug Gross, Employers, Workers Navigate Pitfalls of Social Media, CNN (Feb. 7, 2012), http://www.cnn.com/2012/02/07/tech/ social-medialcompanies-social-medialindex.html ("In 2012, it is nearly impossible to imagine any company engaging with the public without using Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn or other social networks.").

7. PhoneDog v. Kravitz, No. C 11-03474 ME1, 2011 WL 5415612, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2011).

8. Courteney Palis, Facebook's 15 Most Popular People: Celebrity Pages with the Most Likes, TM HUFFINGTON Posr (Mar. 14, 2012), http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/ 14/facebook-popular-people-pages-likesn1341726.html?view=print&comm ref=false.

9. Lady Gaga, FACEBOOK, https://www.facebook.com/ladygaga (last visited Feb. 9, 2013).

10. Id.

11. Id.

12. This Article uses the term "worker," because the worker could be either an employee or an independent contractor.

13. As required for trade secret protection, the password to the account is generally secret. See UNwP. TRAD SEcRETs ACr § 1(4), 14 U.L.A. 433 (1985); infra Part Ill.A.

14. This is true to the extent that the people linked to the account are potential customers. See UNIP. TRADE SecMv1rs Acr § 1(4), 14 U.L.A. 433 (1985); infra Part II.A.

15. Christou v. Beatport, LLC, 849 F. Supp. 2d 1055, 1076 (D. Colo. 2012); PhoneDog v. Kravitz, No. C 11-03474 MEJ, 2011 WL 5415612, at *7 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2011).

16. In trade secret law, the default rule is that, at the moment of creation, ownership of the trade secret vests in the party that created the trade secret. See Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. Ciavatta, 542 A.2d 879, 885 (N.J. 1988); RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF UNFAIR COMPFTIfON § 42 cmt. e (1995). Under the hired-to-invent doctrine, however, ownership in the trade secret vests in the employer at the moment of creation if the employer and worker had an implied-in-fact agreement that the worker would develop the trade secret for the employer. Teets v. Chromalloy Gas Turbine Corp., 83 F.3d 403, 407 (Fed. Cir. 1996); RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF UNFAIR COMPIrIION § 42 cmt. e (1995). These rules are discussed in more detail in Part 11.

To view this article in full please click here.

Originally published in Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, Spring 2013.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions