United States: New York ALJ Allows Extended Statute Of Limitations Period On Abusive Tax Avoidance Transaction

A New York Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the Division of Tax Appeals applied a six-year statute of limitations to uphold a deficiency because a taxpayer's investment in an oil and gas partnership was determined to be an abusive tax avoidance transaction.1 The ALJ also declined to abate related penalties.

Description of Taxpayer's Transaction at Issue

Due to the unique and speculative nature of the oil and gas industry, the Internal Revenue Code contains specific provisions directed at encouraging individual investment and influencing the competitiveness of small independent producers in the industry. Specifically, Congress enacted a deduction for intangible drilling costs (IDC) with this purpose in mind.2 Intangible drilling costs are treated as current expenses for federal income tax purposes, rather than depreciated over the life of an oil well, because they have no salvage value.

Belle Isle Drilling Company (Belle Isle) was a New York general partnership formed by Richard Siegal in 2001 for the purpose of acquiring, drilling and developing oil and gas wells. The taxpayer, a New York resident and experienced investor, became a general partner in Belle Isle during 2001. Belle Isle's investment proposal indicated that investors could expect an annual cash flow of approximately 10 to 15 percent of the cash funds invested and an income tax deduction equal to 2.5 times out-of-pocket expenses in the first year of business.

The taxpayer purportedly had three objectives for investing in Belle Isle: (i) to diversify his investment portfolio; (ii) to make money on his investment; and (iii) to reap the associated tax benefits. The taxpayer purchased three units in Belle Isle and initially committed $300,000 cash, $200,000 of which was borrowed via an interest-free note from an entity related to Siegal. Furthermore, the taxpayer signed a subscription agreement to purchase the three units for a total of $840,000, including a note at 8 percent interest for the remaining $540,000 due. The notes and interest were duly reflected in Belle Isle's books and records as assets and interest income, respectively, as well as on Schedule K-1 of Belle Isle's federal partnership returns. The note was assigned to SS&T Oil Co., Inc. (SS&T), which was wholly owned by relatives of Siegal, as security of partnership indebtedness, and the taxpayer pledged as collateral a security interest in his share of Belle Isle. Beginning in 2002, the taxpayer received quarterly invoices from SS&T and timely paid the interest due on this obligation.

In addition to the subscription agreement and note, the taxpayer executed a separate collateral agreement with SS&T requiring him to purchase municipal bonds to be utilized towards the repayment of his subscription note upon maturity. Alternatively, the taxpayer could exercise an option to pay the partnership 15 percent of the face value of the subscription note.

Subsequently, the payment and surety provisions of both the subscription note and collateral agreement were modified to reflect assignment by the taxpayer of 60 percent of his distributions from Belle Isle to SS&T for the purpose of purchasing the required municipal bonds. Also included in this modification were provisions that the taxpayer assignment of distributions be increased to 75 percent, but only to commence after the taxpayer had received cash distributions equal to or greater than the money expended on interest to date (i.e., the taxpayer was never in a negative cash position).

The taxpayer understood that the municipal bonds provided collateral for repayment of the subscription note, as well as a turnkey note (described below) issued by Belle Isle for drilling. The arrangements were established to satisfy the taxpayer's ultimate responsibility to repay the principal due. Thus, the taxpayer also entered into an assumption agreement with Belle Isle and SS&T whereby he agreed to assume personal liability for his pro rata share of the turnkey note, limited to the amount of his subscription note obligation.

The primary service provider responsible for Belle Isle's physical operations was the drilling contractor. Typically, drilling contractors are compensated based on one of three types of payment arrangements: day rate basis (agreed upon rate per day), footage basis (agreed upon rate per foot drilled), or turnkey basis (fixed fee to the point of production). With a day rate contract, the operator bears all the cost and time risks of the drilling operation. Day rate contracts are usually the least expensive if the drilling operation is efficiently managed. Turnkey drilling contracts, which were utilized by Belle Isle, provide risk mitigation for operators and push the cost and time risks to the contractor.

Belle Isle entered into a turnkey drilling contract with SS&T to minimize the risks and expenses associated with its drilling operations. The fee established for this turnkey contract included reimbursement to SS&T at a rate of approximately 500 percent of the cost of a day rate contract. Standard industry markup on a turnkey contract is 10-25 percent more than the cost of a day rate contract.3

New York Tax Posture and Response from Division

The taxpayer timely filed a New York resident personal income tax return for 2001 pursuant to extension on June 19, 2002. Included in this return were income and deductions related to his investment in Belle Isle. Belle Isle included significant IDC in its 2001 return, which were reflected in the taxpayer's deductions on his federal and New York income tax returns. For years 2002 through 2011, Belle Isle made quarterly cash distributions to the taxpayer and its other investors and realized significant income.

In 2006, the New York Division of Taxation's desk audit unit identified two questionable New York State audit cases involving IDC. Further investigation of the preparer of these returns led to the discovery of multiple oil and gas partnerships, including Belle Isle, with similar deductions. Between 2007 and 2008, the desk audit shelter unit of the Division, Division field auditors and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) cooperated on audits of these partnerships. The shelter unit concluded that the transaction engaged in by Belle Isle constituted an abusive tax avoidance transaction.

As a result of this determination, the Division issued a notice of deficiency to the taxpayer based on disallowance of all deductions related to his investment in Belle Isle on March 14, 2008, nearly six years after the taxpayer had filed his New York return. The notice included personal income tax due as well as associated penalties. The taxpayer timely protested the notice and filed an election to participate in the New York tax shelter voluntary compliance initiative for tax year 2001, electing to retain the right to file for refund any amounts paid. Subsequently, the Division reduced the deficiency to reflect this filing and to allow Belle Isle-associated deductions up to the amount of the cash portion of the taxpayer's investment, disallowing only those exceeding the taxpayer's $300,000 cash commitment.

The taxpayer paid the adjusted amounts assessed, then filed an amended personal income tax return for 2001, which constituted a valid claim for refund. Upon the Division's denial of the refund claim, the taxpayer filed a petition in the Division of Tax Appeals seeking the refund. The taxpayer's motion for summary determination on the petition was denied in a written opinion.4 A full hearing was requested to determine whether the Division's notice of deficiency was barred because it was issued more than three years after the taxpayer filed the return, and if not, whether reasonable cause had been demonstrated to allow for abatement of penalties.5

Ruling on Abusive Tax Avoidance Transaction Treatment

Under New York law, while the general statute of limitations is three years,6 tax may be assessed at any time within six years after the return is filed if the deficiency is attributable to an abusive tax avoidance transaction.7 Therefore, a determination of whether the taxpayer's transaction constituted an abusive tax avoidance transaction was crucial, as the Division's notice was issued immediately before the expiration of the six-year period. The taxpayer believed the six-year statute of limitations8 applied by the Division was inapplicable because he did not believe his investment in the Belle Isle partnership was an abusive tax avoidance transaction. Specifically, the taxpayer claimed that tax avoidance was not a principal purpose for investing in the partnership, the debt was genuine under the applicable law, the Division allowed his cash investment as deductible IDC, and the investment and partnership transactions had economic substance and significant nontax purposes.

In its decision, the ALJ cited applicable law, noting the New York statutory and regulatory definitions of abusive tax avoidance transaction,9 reportable transaction,10 and listed transaction.11 The burden of proof with respect to whether the transaction at issue was considered an abusive tax avoidance transaction rested solely with the taxpayer.12 The ALJ identified as necessary proof of this fact not just the creation of a valid partnership, but also economic substance apart from the tax benefits, which it noted would "not be concluded if the transaction was based on nongenuine debt or if any key part of the transaction was not reasonable, such as that the IDC deductions generated were also not reasonable."

The ALJ determined that the structure of the particular transaction at issue in this case was virtually identical to a structure examined by the IRS to determine whether genuine debt was created.13 The case involved another oil and gas partnership owned by Siegal in which an investor engaged in a transactional structure identical to the investment made by the taxpayer in Belle Isle. However, unlike the taxpayer, that investor failed to make payments on the subscription note and also failed to make scheduled interest payments. In that instance, the IRS accepted the debt as genuine. Substantially relying upon that case, the ALJ found that the investment transaction created genuine debt, initially supporting the taxpayers' claim that the investment was not an abusive tax avoidance transaction.

Despite this taxpayer-favorable determination, the ALJ continued to scrutinize the taxpayer's transaction to decide whether the terms of the turnkey contract were reasonable, such that the IDCs generated were not abusive. The ALJ looked to a Second Circuit Court of Appeals case which focused on examining the validity of IDC deductions for federal income tax purposes. The Second Circuit determined in that case that it was the burden of taxpayers to prove the reasonableness of the deductions,14 so the ALJ found that the terms of the turnkey contract must be considered. Even allowing for the value of overhead costs, profit margin and insulation from risk, the turnkey price was established to be exorbitant. Notably, the ALJ stated that the "absence of arm's-length negotiations coupled with a complete lack of transparency fueled the strong incentive to overstate the drilling costs to maximize the IDC and made it impossible to find the turnkey price reasonable." Interestingly, the ALJ mentioned the absence of original signed copies of the agreements at issue, which required the ALJ to come to a separate determination that such agreements actually had been executed.

As the taxpayer failed to meet his burden of proof as to the reasonableness of the turnkey contract, the ALJ determined that the taxpayer failed to demonstrate that the investment was not an abusive tax avoidance transaction, concluding that the transaction had no economic substance apart from the tax benefits conferred. The Division's allowance of the deduction for a portion of the IDC to the extent of the taxpayer's cash contribution was found to be irrelevant to the decision.

Penalty Abatement

The ALJ also found the penalties assessed by the Division for negligence and substantial understatement of tax, as well as penalties asserted and paid by the taxpayer under the New York voluntary compliance initiative to be appropriate. Referencing the taxpayer's business expertise, the ALJ found that the taxpayer knew, or should have known, that the generous terms of the turnkey agreement were not made at arm's length and warranted further investigation.

Commentary

Cases involving potential and actual abusive tax avoidance transactions are typically interesting, and this matter, which is one of the first decisions to comprehensively analyze and interpret the New York abusive tax avoidance transaction provisions, is no exception. Curious facts critical to the final decision include the absence of original signed and executed legal documents relevant to the transaction at issue and the unreasonable price agreed upon for the turnkey contract between entities owned by related individuals.

Taxpayers engaged in any transactions between related parties, which are often subject to a higher level of scrutiny by taxing authorities than transactions between third parties, should have a heightened awareness of the related risks. The fact that the taxpayer in this instance (an intelligent, experienced investor as evidenced by the record) made a knowledgeable decision to engage in the transactions at issue seems to have contributed to the ALJ's decision to refuse abatement of penalties. There is a clear expectation by the Division, and now the Division of Tax Appeals, that savvy investors must perform adequate due diligence prior to engaging in any transactions, especially those including tax minimization as an expected benefit. The question left unresolved in this decision is how much due diligence is necessary to be performed with respect to a particular transaction to prevent the abusive tax avoidance transaction tag in New York.

This decision should further encourage taxpayers to be fully aware of the potential risks and rewards associated with any investment prior to entering into a transaction, including state tax ramifications. Likewise, the decision is instructive in the manner in which one can expect the Division of Tax Appeals to interpret abusive tax avoidance transaction matters.

Footnotes

1 In the Matter of the Petition of Marc S. Sznajderman and Jeannette Sznajderman, New York State Div. of Tax Appeals, ALJ, No. 824235, Mar. 6, 2014.

2 IRC § 263(c); TREAS. REG. § 1.612-4[a]. Intangible drilling expenses are defined as payments for nonsalvageable capital expenditures incurred in connection with oil and gas drilling.

3 Based upon testimony by the Division's expert petroleum engineer. The specific terms and conditions of the contract between Belle Isle and SS&T were noted in the ALJ determination.

4 Matter of Marc S. Sznajderman and Jeannette Sznajderman, New York State Div. of Tax App., DTA No. 824235, Apr. 12, 2012.

5 Penalties were asserted by the Division of Taxation in this case pursuant to N.Y. TAX LAW § 685(b)(1), (2); (p), and pursuant to Laws of 2005, Part N, Section 11(1) for failure to participate in the Voluntary Compliance Initiative available for participants in abusive tax shelters.

6 N.Y. TAX LAW § 683(a).

7 N.Y. TAX LAW § 683(c)(11)(B).

8 Id.

9 N.Y. TAX LAW § 683(c)(11)(B) defines abusive tax transaction as "a plan or arrangement devised for the principal purpose of avoiding tax. Abusive tax avoidance transactions include, but are not limited to, listed transactions ... ."

10 N.Y. TAX LAW § 685(p-1)(5) refers to the definitions of reportable transaction and listed transaction provided in N.Y. TAX LAW § 25. A New York reportable transaction is a transaction that has the potential to be a tax avoidance transaction as determined by the Commissioner and may be prescribed by regulation. The Commissioner has the authority to designate specific transactions that are the same as, or substantially similar to, transactions the Commissioner has determined to be tax avoidance transactions. Further, N.Y. COMP. CODES R. & REGS. tit. 20, § 2500.3(a) includes a definition of a New York reportable transaction.

11 N.Y. COMP. CODES R. & REGS. tit. 20, § 2500.3(b); TSM-05(2)(C); TSB-M-05(4)I.

12 Citing Matter of Sholly, N.Y. Tax Appeals Tribunal, DTA Nos. 801151 and 801152, Jan. 11, 1990. 13 Zeluck v. Comm'r. of Internal Revenue, 103 TCM 1537 (2012). The decision was based in part upon a test for genuine indebtedness garnered from Welch v. Commissioner, 204 F.3d 1228 (9th Cir. 2000).

14 Bernuth v. Comm'r., 470 F.2d 710 (2nd. Cir. 1972).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration
Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:
  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.
  • Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.
    If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here
    If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here

    Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

    Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

    Use of www.mondaq.com

    You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

    Disclaimer

    Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

    The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

    Registration

    Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

    • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
    • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
    • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

    Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

    Information Collection and Use

    We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

    We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

    Mondaq News Alerts

    In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

    Cookies

    A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

    Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

    Log Files

    We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

    Links

    This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

    Surveys & Contests

    From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

    Mail-A-Friend

    If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

    Emails

    From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

    *** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .

    Security

    This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

    Correcting/Updating Personal Information

    If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

    Notification of Changes

    If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

    How to contact Mondaq

    You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

    If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.

    By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions