ARTICLE
28 April 2014

Colorado House Advances Bill Requiring Study Of Fracking Impact Along Colorado Front Range

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

BakerHostetler logo
Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
The Colorado House of Representatives passed a bill yesterday that would require a study of the health impact of fracking in Colorado.
United States Energy and Natural Resources

The Colorado House of Representatives passed a bill yesterday that would require a study of the health impact of fracking in Colorado.  The bill, House Bill 1297, passed with all Democratic Representatives, and one Republican Representative from Grand Junction, Colorado, in favor.

If signed into law, the bill would direct the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment to conduct an "analysis of human health and quality of life" in six counties along Colorado's front range:  Adams, Arapahoe, Boulder, Broomfield, Larimer, and Weld.  According to a fiscal note on the bill, the study will cost approximately $600,000.

The study required under the bill would be conducted in two phases.  Phase one would include a study of existing medical literature, identification of "conditions of interest" that medical literature indicates might be related to oil and gas operations, and a written report presented to general assembly committees by the end of this year.  Phase two would then include mailed and online surveys concerning the identified conditions, and "case-controlled studies" on at least two relevant conditions.

The bill's sponsor, Joann Ginal (D – Fort. Collins), commented after the vote that people across Colorado had expressed concern about the potential effects of increased oil and gas operations in Colorado.  According to Ginal, "This analysis will help [Colorado] be better informed and make educated decisions as we move forward."

The bill will now be considered by the Colorado Senate.

Coverage available here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More