United States: 10 Reasons Every Defendant in Patent Litigation Should Consider Inter Partes Review

Numerous articles and practitioners are touting inter partes review (IPR) proceedings, and for good reason.  Here is a quick breakdown of why these proceedings are considered pro-petitioner and why every patent infringement defendant should give IPR serious consideration.

1. Presumption of Validity Does Not Exist:  Unlike in district court, patents are not assumed to be valid at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB").  See 35 U.S.C. § 282 ("[a] patent shall be presumed valid").  In IPR, patentability of the claims is being challenged, rather than validity.

2. Burden for Finding Unpatentability is Lower:  The burden is lower for the petitioner to challenge patentability in front of the PTAB than for a defendant to challenge the patent's validity in district court.  In district court, a defendant must prove invalidity by clear and convincing evidence.  See Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Partnership, 131 S. Ct. 2238, 2242 (2011).   In contrast, at the PTAB, the petitioner must prove unpatentability by a mere "preponderance of the evidence" standard.  See 35 U.S.C. § 316(e).

3. Claim Construction is Broader:  The PTAB sets forth that claims will be granted their "broadest reasonable construction in light of the specification of the patent in which it appears."  37 C.F.R. § 42.100(b).  This is broader than the "ordinary and customary meaning" to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention, as applied at the district court under Philips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303, 1312-1313 (Fed. Cir. 2005).  The broader the claim, the more likely prior art exists that will render the patent anticipated or obvious.

4. Time-Sensitive Ability to Terminate Pressures Settlement:  The petitioner and the patent owner can reach settlement and request that the PTAB terminate the IPR proceeding under 35 U.S.C. § 317.  If the merits are yet to be decided, the PTAB must dismiss the petitioner from the proceeding, but retains discretion as to whether to dismiss the proceeding with respect to the patent owner.  37 C.F.R. 42.74(a).  When deciding whether to terminate, the PTAB primarily considers how far along the trial has proceeded.  The longer the patent owner waits to settle, the greater the risk that the PTAB will not terminate the proceeding, and may cancel the claims despite a request to terminate.  Petitioners can use this time crunch to pressure the patent owner into earlier settlement in order to save the patent from IPR. 

5. Statistics Show the PTAB is Pro-Petitioner:  Approximately 80% of petitions for IPR have been granted for at least some of the challenged claims, with about 60% of all challenged claims being instituted.  Further, a recent district court decision from the Eastern District of Virginia explicitly states that the USPTO's decision to institute an IPR trial cannot be overturned by a district court.  See Dominion Dealer Solutions LLC v. Focarino, 3:13-cv-00699 (E.D. Va) (holding that the plain language of 35 U.S.C. § 314(d) is "quite clear" that the USPTO's decision to institute IPR is "final and nonappealable").  The Federal Circuit ruled similarly on April 24, 2014, that under the AIA, it does not have authority to hear appeals on whether to institute IPR, at least not until after a final decision, and perhaps not even then.  See St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. v. Volcano Corp., et al, (Fed. Cir. Case No. 2014-1183, Appeal of IPR2013-00258) (pointing to the plain language of the statute, 35 U.S.C. § 314(d), particularly "whether to institute an inter partes review under this section shall be final and nonappealable," and holding that this language "may well preclude all review by any route," and "certainly bars an appeal of the non-institution decision here.").  Once a petition is granted, the outcome highly favors the challenger.  In approximately 70% of IPR trials, all instituted claims were canceled, and at least some of the instituted claims were canceled in the remaining 30% of cases.  Out of the 40 final decisions issued so far, only one IPR proceeding has resulted in the PTAB finding all instituted claims patentable.  See ABB Inc. v. Roy-G-Biv Corp., IPR2013-00286, Paper 80 (April 11, 2014).  However, it should be noted that these highly favorable outcomes for petitioners may have resulted in part from particularly strong cases being selected for the first IPR petitions.  The recent uptick in IPR petition filing may indicate that petitioners are now bringing weaker cases, and could result in the PTAB finding a higher percentage of claims to be patentable.

6. The Patentee's Ability to Amend the Claims is Limited:  As IPR does not provide for claim amendments as a matter of right, a patent owner must move to amend its claims.  See 35 U.S.C. § 316(d).  First, the PTAB must grant authorization to file a motion to amend.  Second, the amendments are limited to cancellation of any challenged claim and a "reasonable number" of substitute claims.  Id., 37 C.F.R. § 42.121.  Third, a motion to amend is limited to 15 pages, which significantly limits the ability to amend.  37 C.F.R. § 42.24(a)(1)(v).  Further, the PTAB has set a high bar for the patentee to prove patentability of the amended claims.  Unlike initial patent examination or the old inter partes reexamination procedure, the PTAB does not examine the amended claims in IPR.  Therefore, instead of merely having to overcome the references identified by the petitioner or the examiner, the patent owner in IPR has the burden to prove "general patentability over prior art" in order to amend.  See Idle Free v. Bergstrom, IPR2012-00027 (Paper 26).  A patentee cannot just show support in the specification for the newly proposed claims and argue that the limitations of the proposed claims were not taught or suggested by the petitioner's identified prior art.  Instead, in order to establish patentability of the proposed substitute claims, the PTAB has stated that a patentee must set forth the level of ordinary skill in the art and what was previously known in the art for each feature relied upon to show patentability.  The patent owner must either affirmatively state that it was the first to have invented or developed that feature, or if not, where those features existed in other contexts and how they worked.  See Idle Free v. Bergstrom, IPR2012-00027 (Paper 26).  The burden to prove general patentability greatly limits a patentee's ability to amend its claims.  Nevertheless, Chief Administrative Patent Judge James Donald Smith at a PTAB roundtable discussion on April 15 hinted that an upcoming PTAB decision will provide guidance for patent owners to amend claims successfully.

7. Estoppel is Limited:  Although a petitioner is estopped from rearguing the bases of invalidity argued (or that could have been argued) at the PTAB, estoppel does not reach all invalidity arguments.  Only patents or publication prior art may be raised in IPR proceedings, and therefore a petitioner can only be estopped from arguing invalidity on those bases.  A defendant could still raise other bases for invalidity in district court, such as non-patentable subject matter, statutory bars triggered by public use or sale, or lack of sufficient written description and enablement.  Further, if the parties settle and the IPR trial is terminated with respect to the petitioner, estoppel does not attach to the petitioner.  See 35 U.S.C. § 317(a).  Similarly, if the USPTO decides not to institute the IPR trial, estoppel does not attach to the petitioner.  See 35 U.S.C. § 315(e).

8. Timing is Generally Faster:  Median time to trial in district court is around 2.5 years, with significant variations across jurisdictions.  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 2013 Patent Litigation Study.  In comparison, IPR trials are instituted within six months after the petition is filed (37 C.F.R. § 42.107(b); 35 U.S.C. §314(b)), and the PTAB must come to a final determination within one year of institution, with a possible six-month extension for good cause.  35 U.S.C. § 316(a)(11). 

9. It Could Save Money:  Initiating a proceeding at the PTAB costs $9,000 to petition, plus a fee of $200 for each claim over 20.  Once initiated, there is an additional $14,000 fee, plus a fee of $400 for each claim over 15.  From there, the fees to take a PTAB proceeding through completion generally range from $200,000 - $750,000.  In contrast, a patent lawsuit costs an average of $530,000 - $3.6 million through the end of discovery, and $970,000 - $5.9 million through final disposition.  AIPLA Report of the Economic Survey (2013).  In part, this may be because district court litigation typically involves increased discovery costs, hearings and additional issues, including infringement, which is not determined at a PTAB proceeding.  However, if the litigation is not stayed, you may not save that money as IPR and district court litigation may be forced to proceed concurrently.

10. PTAB Has Technical Expertise:  In contrast with most district court judges and juries, the PTAB is staffed with experienced patent attorneys with technical backgrounds.  Familiarity with patent law and greater technical understanding favors petitioners, particularly where the technology or aspects of patent law at issue are complex.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions