United States: Domain Dispatches: NETmundial Day 1 - A Parade and then a Circus

Last Updated: April 25 2014
Article by Gregory S. Shatan

NETmundial, the Global Multistakeholder Meeting on the Future of Internet Governance, opened Wednesday, April 23 in Sao Paulo, Brazil.  Around 800 participants representing governments, private sector, academia, civil society and the technical community filled the room, with at least twice that participating remotely.

The morning session consisted entirely of a parade of speeches from dignitaries, most from government, with a smattering from other stakeholder groups.  A few themes and a few speeches stood out.

After the introductory remarks came perhaps the most stirring speech, from Nnenna Nwakanma. Africa Regional Coordinator of the World Wide Web Foundation.  Dressed in colorful and striking African garb, she began, "My name is Nnenna. I come from the Internet."  She went on: "I work to establish the open Web as a global public good and a basic right, ensuring that everyone can access and use it freely.  That is what I do for a living."  She called NETmundial the "World Cup of Internet Governance."

She cited three key issues for the future of the Internet:  access, social and economic justice, and freedom and human rights.  Turning to Internet governance specifically, she cited three more issues: participation, resources and change.  Her remarks on change constituted fairly outspoken criticism of what she sees as the current state of affairs:

NetMundial is offering us a chance at change.  Let us seize it:
From one stakeholder hijacking the process – to an open and inclusive process.
From top officials issuing orders – to a collaboration.
From summary reports – to transparency.
From power - to  accountability.
From  monologues – to dialogues and debates.
Change the rhetoric of cyberwar – to the notion of Internet for peace. 
Change from  cyber threats – to digital solidarity.
And these, I believe, will guide us in  the IANA transition.

The speech by President Dilma Rousseff of Brazil directly cited "mass surveillance" as a motivating factor of NETmundial, stating: "These events are not acceptable, they were not acceptable in the past and remain unacceptable today."  This emphasis was certainly welcomed by some participants, especially from civil society, who criticized the draft Outcome Document as going soft on mass surveillance.  The treatment of mass surveillance would continue to be an overarching theme of NETmundial.

Neelie Kroes of the European Union gave a blunt call to action: "If we simply do more talking, use more nice words, we will have wasted the opportunity and failed the global community."  She went on to say that "during the next two days, I will be breathing down everybody's neck until we have a discussion on concrete actions."  Judging from the rest of the day's efforts, she must be out of breath.

Carl Bildt, Sweden's Minister of Foreign Affairs, pushed back somewhat on the mass surveillance issue.  He stated, "The issue of surveillance are in no way related to the issues of the governance of the net.  Irrespective of the way the net is governed, repressive regimes or other types of regimes can violate these principles.  I'm stressing this point since sometimes the debate on surveillance is used as an argument to change the governance of the net."  He also called for balance: "One of the primary responsibilities of government is to provide security for its citizens against crime and external threat, and this is also, let's not forget, about protecting their human rights.  Law enforcement needs to have some ability to combat criminal activity also online, and government needs to be able to meet external threats also online."  He went on: "Experience shows that there must be clear rules, firmly based in the values of the societies we seek to build. Sweden believes that surveillance, within or outside national borders, should be subject to basic principles."  He listed these principles:

First, legality.
Second, legitimate aim.
Third, necessity and adequacy.
Fourth, proportionality.
Fifth, judicial authority.
Sixth, transparency.
Seventh, adequate oversight in a number of different respects.

Finally, Bildt took a position that would be popular with many participants, but not with authoritarian regimes.  As previously noted, the relative roles of governments and all other stakeholders is a hot issue.  The draft Outcome Document included references to stakeholders working "in their respective roles and responsibilities."  This is just code for "governments are more equal than other stakeholders when it comes to policy."  When a country doesn't trust its citizens, this attitude comes naturally.  Sweden, like other countries with greater emphasis on personal rights and a greater trust in its citizenry, doesn't feel the need to push back against the "multi-equal" multistakeholder model.

Indeed, Bildt gave an impassioned defense of the multistakeholder process, without assigned "roles and responsibilities."  It's worth considering his words verbatim:

"Multistakeholder is a difficult concept, is a word that is not easily translated either into Swedish or I think most other languages either. It often scares diplomats and government officials used to the familiar setting of round tables and raised nameplates.  But as a concept, it represents a process of cooperative development where all interested parties are welcome to contribute, with the goal of achieving better policies.  And - of absolutely critical importance - it seeks to guarantee that no single interest should ever be able to capture control of the net.  Not big business. Not big government. Not anyone else.  Everyone has a stake. Everyone should have a voice. But no one should be able to capture control of it.  That is to be the essence of what we call the multi-stakeholder model."

"In our discussions we need to consider this concept more deeply, and what it means on national, regional and global levels, as well as for issues beyond those of a purely technical nature.  We cannot prejudge which areas are of relevance to specific stakeholder groups, and we should therefore not try to assign strict definitions of roles for these groups, but rather stress openness and flexibility.  We are all stakeholders in the development of the internet, with legitimate interests and points-of-view."

Nikolai Nikiforov, the Russian Minister of Communication and Mass Media, took the opposite position.  Not surprisingly, Nikiforov called for a multi-governmental structure "aimed at development and introduction of international norms and other standards on internet governance," and demanded that this take place within "the framework of the UN or ITU."  In case his intent was not clear enough, he also denigrated both the Internet Governance Forum (IGF – a multistakeholder body put together expressly to discuss internet governance issues) and ICANN.  The IGF, Nikiforov said, is no decision-making body, and ICANN is "not a globally respected international global organization," which "automatically rules" complying with the principles of the equality of states.

Abdullah Abdulaziz Aldarrab, the Minister of Communications and Information Technology for Saudi Arabia, sounded a similar note, claiming that "international public policy in regard to the Internet is the right of governments and that public policy should be developed by all governments on an equal footing."

With close to 30 speeches in the morning, it would be impossible to touch on them all.  There were strong contributions from Internet pioneers like Vint Cerf and Tim Berners-Lee, and from the business and technical communities as well.  Perhaps these can be reviewed in a future posting.

If the morning was a parade of speakers, the afternoon was a circus. This was a "working session," where the various stakeholders could comment on the draft Outcome Document.  There were four microphones and four lines – one each for governments (and IGOs), academia and the technical community, civil society, and the private sector.  While broad generalizations are dangerous, many civil society speakers wanted to strengthen privacy rights, make anti-surveillance language more explicit and bring "net neutrality" back into the document.  The private sector tended to push back on net neutrality, support multistakeholderism and be concerned about cybercrime and intellectual property theft.  Technical types wanted to insure that processes and standards would be able to grow and change in an unimpeded fashion.  Governments varied – access and development were concerns of many underdeveloped countries, repressive regimes wanted more government-centric solutions, and more open nations were comfortable with multistakeholder processes.  Most countries wanted to reserve at least some flexibility to continue to protect their citizens (i.e., to conduct surveillance of some sort); the attitude tended to vary based on whether they governments were more "spied on" or "spying" (at least in their public posture).

NETmundial Day 2 promises to be more of the same – interesting, stultifying, energizing, exhausting, frustrating, productive.  The "tug of war" between different positions will continue, and consensus may be hard to find.  Only time will tell what the end results of NETmundial will be.

This article is presented for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions