United States: What Role Should The SEC Play In Regulating Cybersecurity?

Last Updated: April 22 2014
Article by Peter J. Isajiw

Most Read Contributor in United States, October 2018

In response to growing concerns surrounding cybersecurity — and a number of highprofile data breaches — on March 26, 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or "Commission") hosted a roundtable discussion on the issues and challenges of cybersecurity. The roundtable was divided into four panels, and experts and industry leaders were invited to comment on cybersecurity issues faced by financial markets and public companies. The discussion made clear that cybersecurity issues pose a serious and complicated problem from a regulatory perspective. As means to continue the dialogue begun with the roundtable, the SEC has opened a public comment period to solicit feedback on cybersecurity issues.

Opening Remarks: Cyber Threats Are A Greater Risk To The Economy Than Terrorism

The session opened with brief remarks from Chair Mary Jo White. White noted that cyberattacks "are of extraordinary and long-term seriousness" and stressed that the public and private sectors need to be "riveted in lockstep" in addressing the complex threats they pose. White noted the Commission last year adopted Regulation S-ID, which requires certain regulated financial institutions and creditors to adopt and implement identity theft programs, and that the SEC's Division of Corporate Finance ("CorpFin") issued guidance in October 2011 on public company disclosures of cyber breaches and risk. She emphasized that the issue is an important one that the SEC "has continued to study." Commissioner Luis Aguilar noted that financial markets are dependent on sophisticated and interconnected technology, and that cyberattacks on financial institutions and the infrastructure underlying capital markets are increasingly common. As a result, Commissioner Aguilar continued, the Commission was seeking input on balancing security needs against the business needs of public companies and regulated entities.

The Cybersecurity Landscape

The topic of the first panel was the current cybersecurity landscape. The panel discussed the need for a multi-stakeholder approach to cybersecurity, and the importance of treating cybersecurity not as a technology or security issue, but as an institutional business issue. The panel stressed the importance of businesses having a cybersecurity response plan, and the need to have adaptable, continuous monitoring of cybersecurity systems so that entities can most effectively target their scarce resources to protect against ever-changing threats.

Larry Zelvin, Director of the Department of Homeland Security's National Cybersecurity and Communication Integration Center, spoke to the importance of sharing information on threats between the public sector and government. Representatives of the private sector agreed that information sharing is crucial, but indicated that they need clearer channels of communication and guidelines as to what businesses can share with government — and each other — without creating potential liability related to privacy and civil liberties concerns.

Commissioner Aguilar asked those government representatives present whether the disclosures made in SEC filings are reaching individuals responsible for cybersecurity, and if this information is useful to them. Zelvin replied that "there is more pull than push" when it comes to getting timely information from public companies, and that generally by the time companies make disclosures in SEC filings, the information is no longer timely.

Cybersecurity And Public Company Disclosures

The second panel addressed the topic of public company disclosures. Chair White and other commissioners questioned the panel about the usefulness of CorpFin's cybersecurity disclosure guidelines. Douglas Meal of Ropes & Gray LLP remarked that he cannot think of a case where a company's disclosures were driven by securities laws. He noted that there is a "tremendous disincentive" to disclose a data breach because of the likelihood of resulting class action litigation and investigation by consumer protection regulators who "often see companies as perpetrators as opposed to victims" when a data breach occurs. Meal stated that where companies have made disclosures, this is generally driven by state disclosure or consumer protection laws, and where companies are not otherwise obligated to disclose a data breach, they will almost never treat it as a material event to be disclosed under federal securities laws.

Jonas Kron, the Director of Shareholder Advocacy for Trillium Asset Management, stated that corporate disclosures of cybersecurity risks have largely become boilerplate, and are not useful to investors. He stated that all companies are exposed to external threats from hacking, cybercrime, espionage, employee negligence and the like; what investors want to know is what companies are doing internally that make those external threats more or less risky. In particular, Kron called for companies to disclose what private information they collect, how they use it, and how long they keep it. In his view companies often over-collect data and thereby create a greater risk for themselves in the event of a cyber-attack, and he feels investors want the information to be able evaluate these risks.

Several panelists challenged the notion that the occurrence of a data breach, even if massive, is a material event that companies ought to be required to disclose to shareholders. Meal stated that in "80-90% of cases" the stock price movement in response to disclosure of a data breach is modest. Peter Beshar of insurer Marsh & McLennan agreed and pointed to the example of TJX Companies, which experienced no stock price reaction when it announced one of the largest data breaches in history. Professor Roberta Karmel stated that while cybersecurity is an urgent social and policy issue, she questioned whether the SEC was the correct agency to address it. She suggested that trying to use disclosure rules to regulate corporate behavior — like cybersecurity — that may not be directly related to the integrity of financial markets can dilute the usefulness of those disclosures. Karmel added that she felt the 2011 CorpFin guidance was "good," and perhaps it could be refined to reduce the amount of boilerplate language in disclosures. However, she urged the SEC not to "go overboard with regulatory requirements." Leslie Thornton, General Counsel for WGL Holdings, Inc., and Washington Gas Light Company, suggested that the SEC should consider creating different disclosure requirements for companies in the critical infrastructure arena than those involved in consumer retail given both the distinct threats faced by, and the disparate impact that a cyberattack would inflict upon, each industry.

Cybersecurity And Market Systems Risk

The third panel addressed cybersecurity risks to market systems. Representatives of several exchanges discussed the threats and concerns faced by those markets, and how they are responding. The panel reiterated the importance of information sharing, both between government and the private sector, as well as among private sector entities. The panel praised the usefulness of the Financial Services Information Sharing and Analysis Center (FS-ISAC), an industry-wide information exchange for threat information, and discussed the importance of tabletop exercises and procedure testing. Mark Graff, NASDAQ's Chief Information Security Officer, stated that one area where the SEC could provide additional information is in regard to the potential that a compromised financial service firm might send a trade to the exchange that was technically sound, but did not reflect the volition of the trader due to hacking or infiltration. He stated that as he understands the issue, the exchange would not be allowed to break that trade, but additional guidance would be useful.

Cybersecurity Issues Facing Broker-Dealers, Investment Advisors And Transfer Agents

The final panel addressed the concerns of broker-dealers, investment advisors, and transfer agents. The major topic of discussion was the possibility that the SEC might promulgate rules pertaining to cybersecurity for brokerages and other regulated entities. Panelists pointed out that unlike a retailer, who might regain customer trust after a data breach, one incident of customer loss due to a network infiltration could bring down an investment house. John Reed Stark of Stroz Friedburg asked the SEC to be judicious in referrals for enforcement, as it is in firms' best interest to use best practices, and where they fail to do so, they probably need instruction more than enforcement. David Tittsworth from the Investment Adviser Association urged the Commissioners to "please resist the urge to impose rigid guidelines," and instead focus on disseminating information and best practices; likewise, Karl Schimmeck of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association urged the Commission to avoid prescriptive guidelines and instead focus on outcomes and providing flexible frameworks." The panel pressed the Commission to take steps to ensure that smaller firms are educated and encouraged to adopt "highest common denominator" standards, rather than attempt to regulate to the lowest common denominator.

The Discussion Continues

This Roundtable likely is the beginning of a strong push on the SEC's part to become more involved in cyber issues. As noted by Commissioner Aguilar, "there is no doubt that the SEC must play a role in this area, what is less clear is what that role should be."

The Commissioners seemed particularly attuned to panelists' pleas for more robust sharing of information on the part of the government, as well as clearer guidance on information sharing from industry to government and among businesses. To continue the discussion, the SEC strongly encouraged members of the public to provide feedback and comments through the SEC's website.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions