United States: Mediating With A Litigation Committee Or Trust

Last Updated: April 16 2014
Article by Leslie Berkoff

While mediation is used in many forums, mediation in the bankruptcy context at times offers some very unique and key distinctions. One key difference is that the party often acting as the plaintiff in the adversary proceeding or contested matter1 is not necessarily the business owner but rather a litigation committee2 or trustee who is running a court ordered process long after the debtor has failed.3 Thus, the procedural context is very different than other traditional cases where both parties involved in the mediation were also involved in the original "dispute" and are at the table resolving their own personal issues and competing claims. In these cases, the plaintiff has no historical knowledge of the facts, or underlying business arrangements that relate to the dispute at hand. Moreover, it is entirely possible that the key employees or other parties with knowledge of the history and facts are long since gone—having lost their jobs months or years prior during the failed restructuring of the corporate operations or having left for greener pastures when things turned rocky or uncertain. Thus, the plaintiff has to learn all of the key facts at a time when there may be no one with first-hand knowledge to educate them.

The question is—does the process still work? Can you successfully mediate with a new and unfamiliar party at the table? The answer, this author believes, is yes and by experience, it works quite well. The absence of a party with historical knowledge does not preclude the usefulness or success rate for the mediation process. Rather, the replacement at the table with a party whose primary obligation is to act as a fiduciary to maximize assets, minimize and justify expenses, and ensure a reasonable return for creditors may in fact allow for a more expeditious resolution of the case. In my experience, this new plaintiff can oftentimes survey the facts with more benign objectivity and can call upon knowledge gleaned from other similar businesses where they might have served in a similar capacity in the past. Thus, these plaintiffs are open to being educated on the specific business facts, unique to the debtor's business currently at play. Moreover, they can, without emotional or historical baggage, analyze the pros and cons of the litigation risks that are before them and decide how to proceed.

Recognizing the usefulness of the mediation process in balancing costs and resolving disputes has led bankruptcy courts to champion this process in the business context. Although the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedures are silent about the ability to use mediation in the bankruptcy forum, 51 bankruptcy courts have opted to create court rules that authorize the use of mediation; other courts have used mediation on an ad hoc basis.4

Bankruptcy courts derive the power to implement mediation from both statutory and rule based authority. Specifically, Congress passed the Authorization of Alternative Dispute Resolution in 1998 (Public Law 105-315-Oct. 30, 1998), which provides for the use of alternative dispute resolution in bankruptcy.5 Over time, many bankruptcy courts have established formal mediation programs and procedures and implemented local rules to govern the process.6 Moreover, most courts have now established mediation panels comprised of pre-approved (and at times pre-vetted) panel mediators who can be called upon to serve in a case. This is simply not a new process for the bankruptcy courts.

In recent years, mediation has been especially effective in the context of "mega-bankruptcy" cases.7 Examples of these cases include both the Enron and the Adelphia Communications bankruptcy cases, each of which eventually found their way to judicial mediators.8 In both cases, multiple disputes within the bankruptcies cases were referred to mediation, including claims objections, efforts to recover assets, and declaratory judgment actions or specific discrete factual and legal issues.9

At their core, bankruptcy courts are courts of "dispute resolution where qualified debtors reapportion their debt allocation. Efficiency is the priority. Within this statutory framework, judges, trustees, and credit counselors serve dispute resolution roles identifying the creditors that are to be involved, facilitating the development of the plan and deciding on how the debt allocation will proceed."10 Part of the impetus in all of these cases to using mediation is the benefit of reducing costs, as bankruptcy litigation costs for the debtor (or estate representative) or litigation committee are paid from property of the estate. Funds paid for litigation diminish and deplete creditor recoveries. Thus, plaintiffs bear the responsibility of carrying out their fiduciary duty to creditors and acting in a cost effective manner that must at the end of the day serve as a guiding force.11 As a general rule, trustees (including liquidating trustees) are guided by their primary objective to maximize recovery for the estate or specific classes of creditors. Their decisions are governed by the business judgment rule, which holds that the trustee's decisions and actions are entitled to respect and deference, if the trustee can articulate a sound business reason for the action taken.12

While many defendants often express concern over the use of a "litigation appointed plaintiff," in the process, more often than not the clinical and dispassionate approach applied by this new party when balanced by need to justify fees more than tempers any lack of historical knowledge or personal history. Rather, plaintiffs feel constrained to justify any actions they take more keenly than other traditional plaintiffs do.13 So too, a creditor's committee has a fiduciary obligation to represent the interests of all unsecured creditors.14

Mediation is a delicate process that works best when parties are committed to the resolution and keep their eye on the end goal of achieving a reasonable result that balances litigation risks and concerns. The insertion of a new party into the factual dispute between business entities that have a history as to which this new party may have no first hand familiarity does not adversely affect that dynamic.

Given the considerations that one must draw upon as guidelines in resolving matters in mediation, i.e., costs, risks and closure, are the same kinds of concerns that underpin the fiduciary obligations held by the plaintiff in these matters, the consistency of these concerns only serves to facilitate a reasonable and expeditious result. Overall, defendants should appreciate that an increased level of objectivity is brought to bear on the process and recognize that the need to unemotionally balance these concerns may allow for a more expeditious and efficient result that benefits them in the end.


1. Adversary proceedings are litigations brought within the context of a bankruptcy case and involve discrete issues that are being litigated in the bankruptcy forum, whereas contested matters arise when affirmative relief sought by motion practice is opposed. In either context, the rules of discovery come into play and mediation is often utilized to resolve the issues. See Rules 7001 and 9014 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

2. See In re Commodore Int'l, 262 F.3d 96, 99 (2d Cir. 2001) (recognizing the ability for creditor's committees to initiate adversary proceedings to pursue litigation in the name of the debtor); see also In re STN Enters., 779 F.2d 901, 904 (2d. Cir. 1985).

3. Alternatively, it may be that the debtor is simply out of the picture having divested itself of such claims for the benefit of the unsecured creditor body under a plan or by other agreement. See Order Granting Motion of BGI Creditors' Liquidating Trust and the Liquidating Trustee to Establish Procedures Governing Adversary Proceedings Brought Pursuant to Sections 547 and 550 of the Bankruptcy Code, In re BGI, f/k/a Borders Group, Case No. 11-10614, Doc. No. 2922, and Order Establishing Procedures Governing Adversary Procedures Brought Pursuant to Sections 547 and 550 of the Bankruptcy Code, In re Oldco M Corporation (f/k/a Metaldyne Corporation), Case No. 09-13412, Doc. No. 1726.

4. Elayne E. Greenberg, "ADR Meets Bankruptcy: Cross-Purposes or Cross-Pollination?: We Can Work It Out: Entertaining a Dispute Resolution System Design for Bankruptcy Court," 17 Am. Bankr. Inst. L. Rev. 545, 547 (2009) (noting that "[u]nbeknownst to many, bankruptcy courts have been using mediation as part of the case management of bankruptcy cases since 1986 when the Southern District of California established the first mediation program").

5. See 28 U.S.C. §§651-658, 651(b) (2014) (identifying current statutory citation).

6. Prior to the implementation of formal local rules, many bankruptcy judges relied on §105 of the Bankruptcy Code to facilitate the mediation process.

7. See Hon. Cecelia G. Morris & Cheryl J. Lee, "From Behind the Bench: Toward an Efficient Mediation Model—Evaluative Mediation in Bankruptcy," 4 Norton Bankr. L. Advisor 2, 6 (2007).

8. So too, have many other bankruptcy cases utilized this, entering orders providing for Proposed Procedures in cases where a debtor, creditors' committee or trustee anticipates filing a large number of avoidance actions. See, e.g., In re Oldco M. (f/k/a Metaldyne), Case No. 09-13412 (MG) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.) (Docket No. 1726); In re Lehman Brothers, Case No. 08-01420 (JMP) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.) (Docket No. 2894); In re Creative Group, Case No. 08-10975 (RDD) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.) (Docket No. 421); In re Bernard L. Madoff, Adversary Case No. 08-01789 (BRL) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.) (Docket No. 3141).

9. See also Greenberg, supra note 4. Mediation has also proven to be a significant tool in the Detroit bankruptcy case. In fact, it has been recognized that, absent the use of mediation, in this case the funds and resources were simply not there to efficiently resolve the issues. "What has transpired is a delicate balancing act in bankruptcy court, where the public's right to know how public money is being handled is being weighed against the rights of creditors and debtors to resolved their disputes in private." See Tresa Baldas, Matt Helms & Alisa Priddle, "How Mediation has Put Detroit Bankruptcy on the Road to Resolution," Detroit Free Press, Feb. 20, 2014, http://www.freep.com/article/20140202/NEWS01/302020063/Orr-Snyder-Rosen-Detroi-bankruptcy . As lead mediator, Chief Judge Gerald E. Rosen oversaw several contentious restructuring talks between the city and its creditors, brokered the rescue fund to boost pensions and shielded artwork from being sold. Id.

10. Greenberg, supra note 4, at 547.

11. "[A] bankruptcy or reorganization trustee is a fiduciary of each creditor ... . As such, he has a duty to treat all creditors fairly and to exercise that measure of case and diligence that an ordinarily prudent person under similar circumstances would exercise." David P. Primack, Note: "Confusion and Solution: Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Trustee's Standard of Care for Personal Liability," 43 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1297, 1309 (2002) (citing Hall v. Perry (In re Cochise College Park), 703 F.2d 1339, 1357 (9th Cir. 1983)). For a lengthy discussion on the standard of care to be applied to actions of trustees, see id. ("The first and only Supreme Court case to address the issue of the standard of case for a reorganization trustee is Mosser v. Darrow."). In Mosser v. Darrow, the Supreme Court recognized that it needed to be proactive in protecting bankruptcy trustees so they were not hindered in making business judgments by others that these decisions could later be "open to serious criticism by obstreperous creditors aided by hindsight." Mosser v. Darrow, 341 U.S. 267, 273-74 (1951).

12. See In re Diplomat Const., 481 B.R. 215, 220-21 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2012); see also Comm. of Equity Security Holders v. Lionel (In re Lionel), 722 F.2d 1063, 1070 (2d Cir. 1983); In re Thomson McKinnon Secs., 120 B.R. 301, 307 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1990).

13. "The benchmark for determining the propriety of a bankruptcy settlement is whether the settlement is in the best interests of the estate." In re Energy Coop., 886 F.2d 921, 927 (7th Cir. 1989); see also Martin v. Kane (A & C Properties), 784 F.2d 1377, 1380 (9th Cir. 1986), cert. den. sub nom, Martin v. Robinson, 479 U.S. 854 (1986). The seminal case in this area is Drexel v. Loomis, which highlighted the paramount interests of the creditors and a proper deference to their reasonable views. Drexel v. Loomis, 35 F.2d 800, 806 (8th Cir. 1929). It is well established that compromises are favored in bankruptcy. See 9 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 9019.03 (15th ed. 2008). As the Supreme Court noted in TMT Trailer, "[i]n administering reorganization proceedings in an economical and practical manner, it will often be wise to arrange the settlement of claims to which there are substantial and reasonable doubts." Protective Comm. for Indep. Stockholders of TMT Trailer Ferry v. Anderson, 390 U.S. 414, 424 (1967).

14. See, e.g., In re Bohack, 607 F.2d 258, 262 n.4 (2d Cir. 1979) (confirming that a "committee owes a fiduciary duty to the creditors, and must guide its actions so as to safeguard as much as possible the rights of minority as well as majority creditors" (citing Woods v. City Nat'l Bank & Trust, 312 U.S. 262, 268-69 (1941))); In re Caldor, 193 B.R. 165, 181 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1996); In re Ionosphere Clubs, 101 B.R. 844, 855 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1989); In re McLean Indus., 70 B.R. 852, 862 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1987).

Originally published in New York Law Journal

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Leslie Berkoff
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.