United States: Structured Thoughts: News For The Financial Services Community, Volume 5, Issue 3

Last Updated: April 16 2014
Article by Bradley Berman, Lloyd S. Harmetz and Anna Pinedo


On February 11, 2014, the SEC's Division of Corporation Finance sent a "sweep" letter to exchange-traded note (ETN) issuers. The letter contains 14 items, some of which have application to all structured products, not just ETNs. The letter is the first significant SEC statement about ETNs since the SEC's Division of Market Regulation issued two Regulation M no-action letters in 2006 and 2007.1

ETNs are inherently more complex, and more difficult to describe simply, than a typical structured note. Due to the effect of the annual fee, and the redemption and call features, the payoff profile of an ETN is difficult to describe succinctly in the up, flat and down scenarios descriptive of many non-ETN structured notes. Consequently, prospectus descriptions of ETNs are often lengthy and use multiple defined terms. Some of the items in the sweep letter address these disclosure issues.

Terms of the Offering

For example, Item 1 of the sweep letter asks issuers to "revise your prospectus supplements, as appropriate, to disclose the material terms of each ETN in a clear, concise and understandable manner," citing the SEC's plain-English disclosure requirements.

Item 6 of the sweep letter requests clear disclosure of the redemption value of an ETN. The SEC asks issuers to disclose whether the redemption value is publicly available prior to an investor's redemption. ETN issuers normally disclose in the prospectus supplement that there is a one-day delay during which a redeeming investor is at risk due to the time period between the investor's submission of a properly executed redemption request and the calculation of the actual redemption price on the trading day following receipt of the request. Generally, a related risk factor is also included.

Item 7 of the sweep letter relates to disclosure of any applicable fees that may be charged relating to the ETNs. This item mentions index calculation fees, in addition to the normal ETN-related charges, such as annual fees and redemption charges. The Item requests disclosure of the party responsible for payment of each fee, how the fees may change based on the performance of the underlying asset, when the fees are collected and their effect on the redemption amount and the intraday indicative value. Issuers of any structured notes linked to an index (whether or not in ETN form) for which fees are deducted when calculating the index level may consider this guidance related to fee disclosure and, to the extent possible, add an explanation of their effect on the index level and payout at maturity.

Item 2 of the sweep letter requires revisions to prospectus supplements that do not disclose that the issuer may cease or suspend and restart sales of ETNs any time at the issuer's discretion. This item also requests clear disclosure of the effect of any such actions on liquidity in the secondary market and the addition of appropriate risk factors, if the issuer views such discretion as material.

This comment seems to be a response by the SEC to a few cases where ETNs began to trade away from the value of the underlying reference asset, due to shortages of those ETNs caused by various issuer actions. Due to these types of events, most ETN prospectuses contain clear disclosure of any internal position limits that may cause the issuer to cease ETN issuances and the resulting potential price distortions between the trading value of the ETNs and the value of the underlying asset, as reflected in the indicative value. ETN issuers generally disclose that they may not sell the full principal amount of the ETNs listed on the cover of the prospectus supplement, and may suspend and resume sales of the ETNs at any time, with appropriate risk factor disclosure relating to the effect of those actions on trading prices. Issuers should be wary of suspending and resuming ETN issuances, even for good reasons, as the optics may be negative.

Indicative Value

Issuers of ETNs are regularly "creating," or issuing, new ETNs, and reselling ETNs that have been previously redeemed or repurchased by the issuer's affiliated broker-dealer. Due to the ongoing creations, the "distribution" of the ETNs, for purposes of Regulation M, does not end until the ETN is called or matures. The affiliated broker-dealers of ETN issuers engage in market-making activities in the ETNs, constantly purchasing and selling ETNs in the market. Normally, redemptions by the issuer and market-making bids and purchases by the affiliated broker-dealer would raise questions under Regulation M.

In order to address these Regulation M issues, in 2006, Barclays Bank plc received the iPath Letter from the SEC's Division of Market Regulation, under which the SEC staff granted relief from Rules 102 and 101 for the redemption of ETNs by the issuer and the market-making activities of its affiliated broker-dealer. In the iPath Letter, the staff agreed that the availability of real-time pricing information for both the ETNs (due to their NYSE listing) and the underlying reference asset (index levels are publicly available in real time), plus the ability of arbitrageurs to redeem ETNs and purchase new ETNs, would prevent any significant differences between the price of the ETNs and the underlying reference asset.

One of the items of trading information on the iPath ETNs that counsel argued was relevant for reference purposes, and the staff did not disagree, was Barclays' real-time publication of the ETNs' intraday indicative value, which is intended to be an approximation of the value of the ETNs and is derived under a formula included in the prospectus supplement. The intraday indicative value is one more piece of information for investors to use to compare against the actual market value of the ETN on the NYSE and the level of the underlying asset when determining whether to hold, redeem or purchase ETNs.

Item 3 of the sweep letter asks issuers to explain the purpose of calculating the indicative value and why it is relevant to investors. The sweep letter requests that issuers avoid presenting the indicative value as a formula, and instead use clear, narrative disclosure.

Item 5 requests that, if the indicative value is included in the prospectus supplement, there be a clear explanation of the differences between the indicative value, "the market value of the ETN relative to the initial price to public" and the redemption amount. A relevant risk factor should also be included. Under the iPath Letter, an issuer must include the indicative value. The redemption amount is typically the indicative value minus the stated redemption fee. Most issuers include robust disclosure about the differences between the different value measures and risk factors, disclosing that the trading prices, and the amount that an investor would receive upon redemption or call, may vary substantially from the indicative value.

Requesting disclosure of the market value of the ETNs relative to the initial price to public seems to call for estimated initial value-type disclosure for ETNs. In the sweep letter's introduction, reference is made to the April 2012 sweep letter "for additional disclosure matters that may be applicable to ETN offerings." The most significant item in the April 2012 sweep letter was the requirement that issuers include their estimated initial value of their structured products in prospectuses. ETNs, as opposed to unlisted structured products, immediately start trading at their actual resale value on the NYSE. Due to, among other things, the liquidity of ETNs and the easy availability of their actual resale value, ETN issuers have not included estimated initial value in their prospectus supplements.

Regulation M

Item 14 of the sweep letter focuses, once again, on ETN price distortions due to a suspension of issuances or a lack of supply (see Item 2 above). In this item, the SEC specifically points to the iPath Letter and the Deutsche Bank no-action letter and requests an explanation of how an issuer's purchase of an ETN in response to a holder's redemption request during a period of price distortion would be in compliance with the Regulation M relief granted in those no-action letters. If an issuer suspends issuance of ETNs, the distribution, for purposes of Regulation M, would be completed, and a redemption of an ETN by the issuer would not violate Regulation M.

Short Sales

In Item 13 of the sweep letter, the SEC requests that issuers disclose short sale activities by broker-dealers and others and how the loans and repurchases will be disclosed, and a confirmation that the issuer will register these transactions under the Securities Act of 1933. Appropriate risk factor disclosure is also requested describing the market effect that short sales and securities lending activities may have on ETN liquidity.

ETN prospectuses normally disclose that dealers (including affiliates of the issuer) may resell an ETN acquired from a holder in a market-making purchase, or pursuant to a redemption, and that they may sell an ETN in covering a short sale transaction. The prospectus will also disclose that it will be deemed to cover any short sales of ETNs by market participants who cover their short position with ETNs borrowed from the issuer or its affiliates.

In the iPath Letter, counsel stated that there would be short sales of ETNs by dealers and exchange specialists to satisfy customer demand. Relief was requested, and received, from two short sale rules, old Rule 10a-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and Rule 200(g) of Regulation SHO under the Exchange Act.

Multi-Tranche Prospectuses

The SEC also questions the practice of using a single prospectus supplement to offer multiple ETNs with different investment profiles. Some ETN issuers will include long and short versions of an ETN with the same underlying asset on one prospectus, or multiple ETNs with different underlying assets on one prospectus. Item 11 of the sweep letter asked issuers to explain why they believe that practices like these are appropriate. Of course, many structured note issuers include multiple notes with the same payoff structure, but different underlying assets of the same type, on one prospectus supplement.


In Item 9 of the sweep letter, the SEC requests disclosure of the number and dollar amount of outstanding ETNs in a series. Most ETN issuers maintain websites on which they publish that information. Their prospectus supplements should make reference to those websites.

Familiar Issues

The sweep letter also calls on issuers to consider other disclosure items that have been previously raised by the SEC:

  • Disclosing activities that create conflicts of interest between the issuer and its affiliates and ETN purchasers, and the impact of those activities on supply, pricing and the market for ETNs (Item 8);2
  • Avoiding security titles that suggest that investors are purchasing anything other than an unsecured debt obligation—use of the word "shares" should be avoided, as should any suggestion that the ETNs are interests in an exchange-traded fund (Item 12); and
  • A reminder to comply with Item 508 of Regulation S-K by clearly disclosing the roles of broker-dealers in sales of ETNs. The staff also requests information as to how these broker-dealers satisfy their prospectus delivery obligations for these offerings.


The SEC requests that issuers respond to the sweep letter within 10 business days (February 27, 2014). It is possible that these response letters will be available on the SEC's website.


Many of the sweep letter's items reflect the SEC's ongoing concerns about clear disclosure to investors, particularly in the area of complex products. Most active ETN issuers' prospectus supplements contain disclosure that is in substantial compliance with the concerns raised by the SEC in the sweep letter.


On March 10, 2014, FINRA filed with the SEC proposed amendments to its communication rules.3 Among other items, the proposal relates to the filing and content requirements for retail communications relating to structured products.4

Filing Requirements

Rule 2210, as amended effective February 2013, requires broker-dealers to file with FINRA "retail communications" concerning registered structured products. Rule 2210(c)(7)(F) exempted from this requirement prospectuses, preliminary prospectuses, offering circulars and similar documents that are filed by the issuer with the SEC.

Many market participants found Rule 2210's filing requirements somewhat ambiguous as to the filing requirements for free writing prospectuses (FWPs) that are exempt from filing with the SEC under Rule 433. The most widely used of these types of documents are preliminary (or summary) "term sheets," which are often provided to investors along with the longer red herring; these documents were typically not filed with the SEC, due to Rule 433(d)(5)(i). Since they were not filed with the SEC, they appeared to require filing with FINRA under the text of the rule. As a result, many brokers began to file these types of documents with FINRA; alternatively, a variety of issuers began to file them with the SEC, notwithstanding the exemption from Rule 433's filing requirement, in order to benefit from the exemption from FINRA filing under Rule 2210(c)(7)(F).

In the proposed rule amendments, FINRA indicated that it intended the exclusions from its filing requirements to cover both prospectuses filed with the SEC and FWPs that are exempt from filing. However, the rules will continue to require broker-dealers to file FWPs with FINRA that are filed with the SEC under Rule 433(d)(1)(ii)—this provision applies to underwriter FWPs that are made available on a broad unrestricted basis, such as a website.

Content Requirements

In addition, the proposed amendment clarifies that an FWP that is exempt from filing with the SEC under Rule 433 is not subject to FINRA's content standards. However, we do not expect FWP disclosures to change significantly as a result of this clarification. These documents, if they contain material misstatements or omissions, can still result in liability under the federal securities laws. Accordingly, market participants will continue to carefully review their content, and whether they are appropriate for the target audience.

FINRA Review

At an appearance in a December 2013 conference, FINRA representatives noted that, as a result of the Rule 2210 filing requirements, it had received more than 800 communications for review.5 FINRA indicated that it had issued comments on approximately 80% of these filings. Many of these were preliminary term sheets, filed with FINRA due to the uncertainties noted above. (Many of these filings also may have been somewhat repetitive, as they could relate to similar offerings that were made on a weekly or monthly basis.) As a result of the FINRA comment process, many market participants have had an opportunity to learn more about FINRA's views as to structured product disclosures, and to make a variety of revisions to their documents to address these views.

Effective Date

FINRA indicated in its proposal that, if the SEC approves the proposals, FINRA will announce the effective date in a Regulatory Notice published within 60 days of the approval. The effective date will be no later than 30 days after that Regulatory Notice.


From time to time, market participants need to consider whether a "comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement" is in effect between a U.S. securities exchange and a non-U.S. securities exchange. This article seeks to help demystify what these are, why they can be important and how they can be found.

When These Agreements Come Into Play

There are a number of contexts in which these agreements are relevant to the SEC's rules, or to relevant stock exchange rules. For example, the SEC relies on these agreements in evaluating exchange rule changes to allow trading in new derivative products that are based on foreign securities or indexes, such as in the case of listed options on an ADR. In such a case, the SEC will want to know that there is a surveillance agreement in effect between the applicable U.S. exchange and the primary non-U.S. exchange for the securities that underlie the ADRs. Under Section 19(b) of the Exchange Act, U.S. exchanges are required to submit proposed rules and rule changes to the SEC for approval, including rules that would allow trading in new derivative products that would not be covered by existing listing standards. In order to approve a proposed rule, the SEC must find that, among other things, the rule is consistent with Section 6 of the Exchange Act, which requires an exchange to have the capacity to enforce compliance with its rules and the securities laws, and to enact rules designed to prevent fraud and manipulation. In making this finding regarding a request for approval of U.S. derivative products based on non-U.S. securities or indexes, one factor that the SEC evaluates is whether the U.S. exchange sponsoring the product has entered into surveillance agreements with the relevant foreign markets.

The issue also arises when an issuer of a structured note attempts to determine whether it can issue a stock-linked note that is linked to a particular non-U.S. equity security, under the "Morgan Stanley letter." In addition to the "S-3/F-3 primary eligibility" test under the Morgan Stanley letter, the letter also provides for the possibility of linking to common equity securities where those securities would be eligible for listing on a national securities exchange under that exchange's rules. The provisions of the relevant rules, such as NYSE Rule 703.21(C)(b)(i), require that the exchange have a comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement with the principal non-U.S. exchange for that security.

What Is a Comprehensive Surveillance Agreement?

A surveillance agreement provides that a non-U.S. entity will be able to produce and share relevant information about market trading activity, clearing activity and customer identity, without being materially impeded by the non-U.S. entity's rules, or secrecy or blocking laws. The SEC has identified the key criteria of such an agreement as the inclusion of provisions as to each of these types of information, and that the party to the agreement has the ability to obtain and produce this information. The SEC must determine that, based on the agreement and any other relevant information provided by the non-U.S. party, existing rules, laws, or practices would not impede the U.S. entity from obtaining the relevant information.

Does Such an Agreement Exist?

Absence of a List.Unfortunately, there is no single source of publicly available information that can be used to determine whether an appropriate agreement exists between the relevant U.S. securities exchange on the one hand, and the non-U.S. securities exchange on the other hand. These are privately negotiated agreements, and cannot be found on any public database. Accordingly, a phone call to the legal department of the relevant U.S. securities exchange may be needed to determine whether the agreement exists.

The ISG.However, since 1994, the SEC has taken the position that a non-U.S. exchange's affiliate membership in the Intermarket Surveillance Group (ISG) will serve to denote the existence of a comprehensive surveillance agreement. The SEC has had the opportunity to review the documentation and agreements used by the ISG to accept affiliate members, and determined that process to be sufficient.

The ISG was established in the 1980s, and includes an international group of exchanges, market centers and market regulators that perform market surveillance in their respective jurisdictions. The ISG coordinates and develops programs and procedures to identify possible fraudulent and manipulative activities across markets, and shares necessary information among members. In the U.S., the ISG's membership includes, for example, the NYSE and Nasdaq. A list of the ISG's non-U.S. members is available on its website (https://www.isgportal.org/isgPortal/public/members.htm), and includes a variety of securities exchanges in the Americas, Asia and Europe on which a variety of U.S.-traded common equity securities have their primary listings. Accordingly, the website can be a useful resource for evaluating a proposed instrument, and whether it will satisfy the relevant rules.


In March 2014, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority fined a broker-dealer for supervisory deficiencies related to its failure to adequately supervise the sale of "alternative investments." These investments include a laundry list of products that have been at the forefront of FINRA's priorities in recent years: non-traded real estate investment trusts, oil and gas partnerships, business development companies, hedge funds, managed futures and other illiquid pass-through investments.

FINRA's findings provide a useful "case study" as to the types of issues that a firm should consider in evaluating its own processes for sales of complex products, including structured products.

Our client alert as to these findings may be found at the following link: http://www.mofo.com/files/Uploads/Images/140327-FINRA-Provides-a-Detailed-Analysis.pdf.


In the first quarter of 2014, the Federal Reserve Board issued its long-awaited final enhanced prudential rule (Regulation YY) under Section 165 of the Dodd-Frank Act for bank holding companies and foreign banking organizations (FBOs) with global consolidated assets of $50 billion or more.

The Federal Reserve expects that approximately 100 FBOs will be subject to enhanced prudential standards under the final rule. In addition, the final rule imposes stress testing on FBOs with total consolidated assets of $10 billion or more, and requires the establishment of U.S. risk committees for FBOs with total consolidated assets of $10 billion that are publicly traded. A number of these entities are significant issuers of structured products in the U.S.

Our client alert as to the final rule may be found at the following link: http://www.mofo.com/files/Uploads/Images/140224-Final-Rule-FBO-Standards.pdf.


1 Barclays Bank PLC, Staff No-Action Letter (July 27, 2006) (the "iPath Letter") and Deutsche Bank AG, Staff No-Action Letter (October 12, 2007).

2 For a discussion of FINRA's recent focus on dealer conflicts of interest relating to structured products, see Volume 4, Issue 13 of Structured Thoughts (October 15, 2013), available at: http://www.mofo.com/files/Uploads/Images/131015-Structured-Thoughts.pdf. FINRA's Report on Conflicts of Interest is available at: http://www.finra.org/web/groups/industry/@ip/@reg/@guide/documents/industry/p359971.pdf.

3 The proposed rules may be found at the following link: https://www.finra.org/web/groups/industry/@ip/@reg/@rulfil/documents/rulefilings/p458589.pdf.

4 The proposed rules would also exclude from the filing requirements research reports that relate only to securities listed on a national securities exchange. The proposal would also address a mistaken cross-reference in FINRA Rule 2214 (Requirements for the Use of Investment Analysis Tools).

5 "SEC and FINRA Personnel Speak at Structured Products Conference", Structured Thoughts, Volume 5, Issue 1 (January 2014), available at: http://www.mofo.com/files/Uploads/Images/140107-Structured-Thoughts.pdf.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Bradley Berman
Anna Pinedo
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.